收藏切换
A Cation-Driven Approach toward Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials
收藏切换
PDF
Cong Hu1, 2, Meng Cheng1, 2, Wenqi Jin1, 2, Jian Han1, 2, Zhihua Yang1, 2, *, Shilie Pan1, 2, *
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0053
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 6 Article ID 0053
• Research Article •
A Cation-Driven Approach toward Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials
Full
Cong Hu1, 2, Meng Cheng1, 2, Wenqi Jin1, 2, Jian Han1, 2, Zhihua Yang1, 2, *, Shilie Pan1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1Research Center for Crystal Materials, CAS Key Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Special Environments, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, CAS, 40–1 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, China.
  • 2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
About Author:

† These authors contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2023-03-20 doi: 10.34133/research.0053
Outline
收藏切换

The design of new materials with special performances is still a great challenge, especially for the deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials in which it is difficult to balance large bandgaps and strong second harmonic generation responses due to their inverse relationship. Cation variation not only influences the whole structure frameworks but also directly participates in the formation of electronic structures, both of which could lead to the uncontrollability of the properties of the designed materials. Here, a novel approach, aiming at purposeful and foreseeable material designs, is proposed to characterize the role of cations. By the verification of several series of borates, the influences of cation variation on property changes are explored systematically. Accordingly, a feasible strategy of designing deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials by substituting barium for lead has been concluded, which could obviously blue-shift the ultraviolet cutoff edge and maintain the relatively strong second harmonic generation response (more than 2 times of KH2PO4), achieving the property optimization, and especially works efficiently in fluorooxoborates. The property optimization design strategy and the cation characterization method are not only helpful in exploring nonlinear optical materials but also enlightening in material design and selection.

Cong Hu, Meng Cheng, Wenqi Jin, Jian Han, Zhihua Yang, Shilie Pan. A Cation-Driven Approach toward Deep-Ultraviolet Nonlinear Optical Materials[J]. Research, 2023 , 6 (3) : 0053 - . DOI: 10.34133/research.0053
Aiming at desirable performances, the material exploration assisted by quantum chemical calculation on computers has led to many new approaches, such as high-throughput screening and machine learning in data mining, or structure prediction by exploratory algorithms [1,2]. With the great demand in laser photolithography, micro-nano processing, optical communication, and medical treatment [3–10], a series of nonlinear optical (NLO) crystals have been discovered and commercialized successfully [11–17]. At present, deep-ultraviolet (DUV) NLO materials particularly attract many academic and commercial interests as the frequency conversion core to achieve coherent light with large photon flow and ultrahigh resolution and are expected to break the “200 nm wall”[18]. However, a large bandgap (Eg > 6.2 eV) is indispensable for DUV transparency, while Eg is inversely proportional to the second harmonic generation (SHG) response (dij) [19]. Therefore, how to satisfy the balance between the two critical performances (Eg and dij) is a key factor in the design of outstanding DUV NLO materials. KBe2BO3F2 (KBBF) exhibits excellent properties as a promising DUV NLO crystal [20,21], but the toxicity and layer-growing habit seriously impede its application. Finding KBBF replacements and balancing Eg and dij in the DUV region are still urgent.
To guarantee appropriate Eg and dij of designed NLO materials, several advantageous NLO-active (the sources of NLO effects) anion units are introduced, such as conjugated π configurations [BO3]3−, [B3O6]3−, distorted d0 or d10 transition-metal-centered (V5+, Cd2+) polyhedra, fluorooxoborate anionic units [BOnF4-n](n+1)− (n = 1, 2, 3), and so on [22–25]. Actually, as parts of the whole electron structures, A-site metal cations could also directly influence the optical properties besides the size effects in crystal structures, but a special study of the role of cation variation is rare. Here, a convenient cation characterization approach, “Cation differentiation by electron spatial distribution” (CRESD), is proposed to distinguish the role of cations in optical properties, and an accompanying design strategy is concluded from cation variation to achieve property optimization, for example, balancing large Eg and large dij in the DUV region. We note that the property optimization strategy and cation characterization approach can be applied in the design of high-performance materials not only for the NLO functions but also for other objects, such as perovskite solar cells.
Along with the increase of Eg, the SHG response of typical NLO materials [26–50] demonstrates an obvious downward trend as shown in Fig. 1 (more details are shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). It is noteworthy that the compounds with outstanding SHG response (compared to d36 = 0.39 pm/V of KH2PO4 [KDP]) in different bandgap regions (or ultraviolet [UV] cutoff ranges) are highlighted in Fig. 1, especially, (I) 3 to 4 eV, Bi3TeBO9 (20.0 KDP) [51]; (II) 4 to 5 eV, CsPbCO3F (13.4 KDP) [52] and BiB2O4F (12.0 KDP) [53]; (III) 5 to 6 eV, PbB2O3F2 (13.0 KDP) [54]; (IV) 6 to 7 eV, β-BaB2O4 (BBO, 5.7 KDP) [55] and K3B6O10Cl (KBOC, 4.0 KDP) [56]; and (V) > 7 eV, CsB3O5 (CBO, 2.7 KDP) [57], LiB3O5 (LBO, 2.7 KDP) [58], NH4B4O6F (ABF, 3.0 KDP) [59], and KBBF (1.2 KDP) [21]. Among the above materials, four compounds exhibit a remarkably large SHG response, more than 10 times that of KDP, and half of the four ones contain lead atoms. However, commercialized applications of lead-containing NLO materials would face two shortcomings, narrow bandgaps, which is one of the main obstacles to the practical DUV applications, and the nonnegligible toxicity of lead cations. The unbalanced performances drive the combination properties of lead borates to be optimized.
To verify the feasibility of property optimization by the design strategy of cations, six lead borates with hierarchical SHG responses, from 3.5 to 13.4 KDP, are selected: Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl [31], Pb3B6O11F2 [35], Pb2B5O9Cl [60], Pb2BO3Br [28], PbB5O7F3 [61], and PbB2O3F2 [54], which crystallize in the noncentrosymmetric space groups, C2221 (No. 20), P21 (No. 4), Pnn2 (No. 34), P321 (No. 150), Cmc21 (No. 36), and P31m (No. 157), respectively. The isostructural barium borates of the first 3 have been reported previously, namely, Ba5(BO3)3Cl [62], Ba3B6O11F2 [40], and Ba2B5O9Cl [63]. It notes that between Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl and Ba5(BO3)3Cl, the substitution from Pb2+ to Ba2+ only exists in the 8c cation Wyckoff positions, while Ba2+ in two 4b and one 4a positions are retained. In Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl/Ba5(BO3)3Cl, the anionic framework is formed by noncondensed BO3 units, while both Pb2B5O9Cl/Ba2B5O9Cl and Pb3B6O11F2/Ba3B6O11F2 possess a 3-dimensional B-O network consisting of BO3 and BO4 units (Fig. 2A to C). Theoretical structural models Ba2BO3Br, BaB5O7F3, and BaB2O3F2 (BaB2O3F2-P31m, hereinafter referred to as BaB2O3F2) are derived from Pb2BO3Br, PbB5O7F3, and PbB2O3F2 by cation substitutions, in which the anion frameworks are formed by a noncondensed BO3 group, a [B5O7F3]∞ layer, and a [B6O9F6]∞ layer, respectively. It should be noticed that the connection of the halide atoms is also different, where F in the fluorooxoborate unit BO3F connects both with the metal Ba and B atoms, while Br connects only to the metal Ba (Fig. 2D to F). The structural information of predicted Ba2BO3Br, BaB5O7F3, and BaB2O3F2 are shown in Tables S2–S4, and their crystallographic details (atomic coordinates, bond distances, angles, etc.) have been listed in Tables S5–S12.
In addition, recently, a noncentrosymmetric BaB2O3F2 with lower symmetry, P21, was successfully synthesized by our group [64]. The relative total energy (Helmholtz free energy) calculated by DFT (density functional theory) between predicted BaB2O3F2 (P31m) and experimental BaB2O3F2 (P21) is less than 20 meV/atom (Fig. 3), and the formation enthalpy of BaB2O3F2 (P31m) is 0.024 eV/atom, and there is no imaginary phonon mode in the phonon spectrum of BaB2O3F2 (P31m) (Fig. S1), indicating the thermodynamical metastability and kinetical stability. Moreover, for comparison, the structure of PbB2O3F2 (P21) is built by a cation substitution for experimental BaB2O3F2 (P21), and the relative total energy between PbB2O3F2 (P21) and experimental PbB2O3F2 (P31m) is about 20 meV/atom, and the formation enthalpy of PbB2O3F2 (P21) is −0.023 eV/atom, which shows the thermodynamical possibility of being synthesized. Here, the formation enthalpies of BaB2O3F2 (P31m) and PbB2O3F2 (P21) are calculated from the general experimental source, B2O3, and BaF2/PbF2.
To clarify the role of cations in property changes, the CRESD method is proposed to characterize the volumetric effects of various metal cations by the occupied volume of electrons, namely, electron spatial distribution (ESD). Taking the above isostructural substitutions of lead/barium borates as examples, the magnitudes of ESD between lead and barium atoms are compared on the basis of atom radius R(M), cation radius R(M2+), and cation volume V(M2+), where V(M2+) = (2 × R(M2+))3 (Table 1). Here, deviation γ is defined as (P1 − P2)/((P1+P2)/2) to evaluate the differentiation of P1 and P2, where parameter P could be the magnitudes of ESD based on atom/cation radius and cation volume, or any other parameters, such as crystal volume, in the following contents. The deviations γ of Pb2+/Ba2+ ESD based on R(M), R(M2+), and V(M2+) are 21.4%, 13.3%, and 39.5%, respectively. Considering the isostructural substitutions, the deviation γ of ESD between Pb2+ and Ba2+ should change slightly. ESD [R(M2+)] is better to characterize the cations but hard to sum arithmetically for composite cations. ESD [V(M2+)] can also be summed arithmetically, but its deviation γ is too large. More importantly, all of the above ESD values are incapable of ion groups, such as [NH4]+, [CH3NH3]+, and so on. Consequently, ESD based on Bader volumes could overcome the above restrictions, where the electron density in the whole space is partitioned by DFT calculation [65,66], and hereinafter the ESD refers to the results on Bader volumes. Pb2+ and Ba2+ have similar values of ESD, and their deviations γ are 6.7%, 8.7%, and 9.0% in M2Ba3(BO3)3Cl, M3B6O11F2, and M2B5O9Cl (M = Pb2+, Ba2+), all of which are lower than that of ESD [R(M2+)] (Table 2), indicating that the ESD changes slightly in isostructural substitution.
ESD can be not only applied in the comparison of experimental structures but also introduced to analyze the change regulations on structures and performances of theoretical structures, such as Ba2BO3Br and BaB2O3F2 mentioned above. As the lattice parameters are relaxed in geometric structure optimization, the values of ESD have been calculated from both optimized and experimental (no-optimization) structures. The ESD and crystal volume in Pb2BO3Br are 27.7/28.3 and 143.6/149.0 Å3 without/with optimization, and their deviation γ is 2.2% and 3.7% (Table S2), indicating the feasibility of structure optimization. Interestingly, the ESD of Pb/Ba in Pb2BO3Br/Ba2BO3Br is 28.3/32.5 Å3, distinctly larger than those of the other 4 couples of lead/barium borates, ~22.0/24.0 Å3, and the deviation γ of cation ESD is 13.9%, the largest one among the 6 couples of lead/barium borates. The reason mainly comes from incompact structures. Pb2BO3Br/Ba2BO3Br belongs to rich metal borates with metal:boron = 2:1, resulting in the delocalization of electrons around metals, where the evidence is the larger deviation γ of crystal volumes between Pb2BO3Br and Ba2BO3Br, 18.6%. On the contrary, PbB2O3F2/BaB2O3F2 contains fewer metal atoms, metal:boron = 1:2, and the cation ESD is also relatively small, 22.0/22.3 Å3. The deviation γ of ESD is the smallest, 5.7%, and the deviation γ of crystal volumes is only 3.0% (Table S3).
To assess the influence of cation variation on property change, the optical properties of the selected lead/barium borates are evaluated and analyzed in detail by DFT calculation. Based on generalized gradient approximation (GGA)-Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functionals, the calculated bandgaps of these lead borates, Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl, Pb3B6O11F2, and Pb2B5O9Cl, are 3.54, 3.81, and 3.36 eV, which are lower than their experimental or HSE06 values, 3.97 eV (312 nm), 5.17 eV (240 nm), and 4.41 eV (281 nm, HSE06), respectively. Here, the underestimation of bandgaps under GGA-PBE functional is derived from the inherent discontinuous exchange-correlation energy [67], and a scissors operator is adopted as the difference between the GGA bandgap and the experimental bandgap to eliminate this underestimation in the calculation of optical properties. In addition, a more expensive calculation, hybrid functional HSE06 [68], is used to achieve the value of bandgap more accurately for the lack of experimental bandgaps.
To verify the theoretic simulations, a couple of borates, M2B5O9Cl (M = Pb, Ba), were synthesized in experiments, and the UV cutoff edge and SHG intensity were also measured (powder X-ray diffraction [XRD] patterns are shown in Fig. S2). As shown in Fig. 4, the UV absorbing cutoff of Pb2B5O9Cl is 281 nm, which is consistent with our HSE06 calculation value of 281 nm. Ba2B5O9Cl shows a UV cutoff edge of 189 nm, which is similar to 185 nm in the previous work [63].
By cation substitution in the three lead borate prototypes with moderate SHG responses, the bandgaps of barium borates have increased to 5.26 eV (236 nm, HSE06), 6.53 eV (190 nm, exp.), and 6.56 eV (189 nm, exp., this work) for Ba5(BO3)3Cl, Ba3B6O11F2, and Ba2B5O9Cl, which exhibit 76, 50, and 92 nm blue-shift from the isostructural lead borates. Correspondingly, the SHG responses have changed to 0.5, 3.0, and 0.7 KDP for Ba5(BO3)3Cl, Ba3B6O11F2, and Ba2B5O9Cl from 3.2, 4.0, and 1.2 KDP of Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl, Pb3B6O11F2, and Pb2B5O9Cl. The experimental SHG intensities of M2B5O9Cl (M = Pb, Ba) are shown in the insets of Fig. 4. It is noted that both Ba3B6O11F2 and Ba2B5O9Cl have obtained DUV cutoff edges (<200 nm), but only borate fluoride Ba3B6O11F2 maintained relatively strong SHG responses (> 2 KDP). For the last three prototypes, borate halide Pb2BO3Br and fluorooxoborates PbB5O7F3 and PbB2O3F2 exhibit remarkably strong SHG responses, 9.5, 6.0, and 13.0 KDP, but their bandgaps are different, 3.33 eV (372 nm), 5.51 (225 nm), and 5.64 eV (220 nm), respectively. After cation substitutions, the combination property of the former changes slightly, 3.87 eV (320 nm) and 7.8 KDP for Ba2BO3Br. Contrarily, BaB5O7F3 and BaB2O3F2 show a great change in their prototype, 7.92 eV (157 nm) with 2.5 KDP, and 8.24 eV (150 nm) with 4.8 KDP. Furthermore, to analyze the source of the variation in bandgaps among the above metal borates, the total and partial density of states are shown in Figs. S3 to S8. Compared to the partial density of states among these metal borates, it is found that the conduction band minima are mainly composed of Pb-p or Ba-d and a little of B-p orbitals, while the valence band maxima mainly contain O-p, a little of halogen p orbitals, along with slight Pb/Sn-s orbitals for the stereochemically active lone pairs. According to the revised lone pair model [69], the interaction between Pb and O drives from the mixture of empty Pb p and a filled antibonding state between Pb-s and O-p states in PbO, and the lone pair stereochemical activity of Pb cations greatly influences the reduction of bandgaps in series of metal borates [70]. Therefore, the cation substitution from Pb to Ba could avoid the stereochemical activity of the lone pairs to achieve a relatively large bandgap, a similar effect that introducing the F atom could eliminate the dangling bonds of BO3 groups in a series of fluorooxoborates [25,47,50,59]. As far as the purpose of property optimization, doubtless, the cation substitution in the fluorooxoborates BaB5O7F3 and BaB2O3F2 is more successful.
Figure 5 shows the changes for bandgap (Eg) and SHG response in the cation substitution from lead to barium. The whole region is divided into 4 sections: I, Eg < 6.2 eV, SHG < 2 KDP; II, Eg ≥ 6.2 eV, SHG < 2 KDP; III, Eg < 6.2 eV, SHG ≥ 2 KDP; IV, Eg ≥ 6.2 eV, SHG ≥ 2 KDP, where 6.2 eV and 2 KDP are DUV and relatively strong SHG response bounds, respectively. Here, before the cation substitution, 5 lead borates in 6 are all located at Section III, indicating strong SHG responses but not DUV cutoff edges. After the cation substitution, these 5 barium borates scatter into 3 sections, 1 (Ba2BO3Br) still in Section III, 1 (Ba5(BO3)3Cl) in Section I, and 3 in Section IV (Ba3B6O11F2, BaB5O7F3, and BaB2O3F2). Although Ba2B5O9Cl shows a DUV bandgap, its SHG response is relatively small for the reason that the SHG intensity of its prototype is not strong. It is found that these lead borates could keep strong SHG responses (≥2 KDP) after cation substitution except Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl and Pb2B5O9Cl, whose SHG response is the smallest among the 6 lead borates. What is more important, the bandgaps of all the lead borates have visibly widened, and especially four of them have exceeded the DUV limit (6.2 eV, 200 nm) after cation substitution. Therefore, the cation substitution from lead to barium could optimize the combination properties.
Considering the importance of SHG response for NLO materials, exploring the role of cation variation on SHG response is vital to deepen the understanding of the structure–property relationship. The real-space atom-cutting technique is an efficient postprocessing tool to evaluate the contribution of microscopic structural groups to optical properties, such as the SHG coefficient. Table 3 shows the results of the calculated SHG coefficients before (original) and after (e.g., cut Pb) cutting the metal cations, and the “SHG reducing” is expressed as “SHG (reducing) = 1 − SHG (cut)/SHG (original)”, which is related to the contribution of metal cations to SHG coefficients. Various nonzero components of SHG coefficients are related to the different symmetries of the point groups (relatively small values, < 0.1 pm/V, are not listed here), and the final SHG response is characterized by the largest SHG coefficient in the effective SHG formula. The results indicate that in Ba3B6O11F2 and Ba2B5O9Cl, lead and barium cations contribute equally to the SHG coefficient. In M(BO3)3Cl (M = Pb2Ba3, Ba5), the Wyckoff site cations cause various contributions to the SHG coefficient d14. Namely, in Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl, two 8c Pb contribute the most of d14, 29% in 33%, and two 4b Ba and one 4a Ba contribute the relatively small parts, 7% and 0.3% in 33%, respectively. In Ba5(BO3)3Cl, two 8c Ba contribute almost all of the d14, but 4a Ba makes a remarkably negative contribution, −30%, which leads to an obvious decrease of the SHG response from Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl to Ba5(BO3)3Cl. For MB5O7F3 (M = Pb, Ba), the metal cations contribute about 10% to 15%, and the relatively small contribution mainly derives from the ratio of metal cations to B-O/B-O-F anion groups is only 1:5.
Furthermore, in M2BO3Br2 and MB2O3F2 (M = Pb, Ba), the cations exert a remarkable contribution to the SHG responses. In addition, in the SHG density map (Fig. S9), there are plenty of unoccupied states contributing to the VE and virtual-hole (VH) process and occupied states contributing to the VH process around Pb and Ba. In MB2O3F2 (M = Pb, Sn, Ba), Sn shows a vitally negative contribution for d33 (−130%), which is the reason that the SHG response of SnB2O3F2 is much lower than that of isostructural PbB2O3F2, in accordance with the results from another group [54], while Sn and Pb play similar contributions to d22, 73% to 72%.
On the other hand, to explore the trends of property changing from PbB2O3F2 to BaB2O3F2, two virtual middle structures, Pb0.75Ba0.25B2O3F2 (Pb0.75Ba0.25) and Pb0.25Ba0.75B2O3F2 (Pb0.25Ba0.75) are introduced. As shown in Fig. 6A, along with the bandgap increasing, the |d33| and |d22| decrease, as the negative relationship between bandgap and SHG response. Here, we add a trend line with the formula d = a / Eg5, where d and Eg are SHG coefficient and HSE06 bandgap values, and the constant a is calculated by the value of d and Eg. Of course, this formula only considers the bandgap effect and ignore the momentum matrix elements [71], so it is a very rough approximation to estimate the trends of SHG coefficients along with bandgaps semiquantitatively. Furthermore, as shown in Table S13, a single Pb atom makes much more contributions to d22 than Ba (22% to 4% in Pb0.75Ba0.25 and 33% to 7% in Pb0.25Ba0.75), while Pb and Ba show similar contributions to d33 (12% to 9% in Pb0.75Ba0.25 and 13% to 13% in Pb0.25Ba0.75). Interestingly, the contributions of a single Ba atom develop both in d22 and d33 as the proportion of Ba content increases. Therefore, the SHG coefficient trends of PbB2O3F2, Pb0.75Ba0.25, and Pb0.25Ba0.75 do not vary so much, while the SHG coefficients of BaB2O3F2 are much larger than the expected value according to the trend lines.
From Fig. S10, the location of Pb-6p in conduction band minimum is nearer to the Fermi surface than that of Ba-5d for the stereochemical activity of the lone pairs. Meanwhile, the SnB2O3F2 obtains a smaller bandgap than PbB2O3F2 for stronger stereochemical activity. Table 3 also shows that Ba2+ contributes the main part of d33 in BaB2O3F2, so the BaB2O3F2 could maintain a large SHG coefficient when obtaining a large bandgap. Furthermore, we also calculate the ESD value of Pb0.75Ba0.25 and Pb0.25Ba0.75 and compared them with PbB2O3F2 and BaB2O3F2. Then, Fig. 6B shows SHG response decreasing along with the increase of ESD in MB2O3F2 (M = Pb, Ba). It is important to note that the above conclusion has only been obtained in the case of cation substitution between Pb and Ba in MB2O3F2 structures.
Through the investigation of a series of barium borates, Ba5(BO3)3Cl, Ba3B6O11F2, Ba2B5O9Cl, Ba2BO3Br, BaB5O7F3, and BaB2O3F2, along with their prototypes of cation substitutions lead borates, we found that ESD is very useful to describe the electron occupied space, and the magnitudes of ESD are similar in the isostructural substitutions. As the aim of chemical substitutions is to develop performances, three cases, one borate fluoride, and two fluorooxoborates, in 6 cation substitutions from lead to barium have achieved the property optimization, enlarging bandgaps to enter the DUV region (6.2 eV, 200 nm) from outside DUV as the absence of lone pair in metal cations, and maintaining relatively strong SHG responses (> 2 KDP) for the reason that metal cations show less contribution to SHG responses than the anion frames. The cation substitution between Pb and Ba in MB2O3F2 structures shows the negative relation between ESDs and SHG responses, which indicates the direction of searching for the NLO material with larger SHG responses. In conclusion, by analyzing the cation variations, a cation substitution approach toward DUV NLO materials has been proposed, and two predicted fluorooxoborates BaB5O7F3 and BaB2O3F2 have achieved the balance between large bandgaps and strong responses.
Polycrystalline samples of Ba2B5O9Cl and Pb2B5O9Cl were prepared by using standard high-temperature solid-state techniques. For Pb2B5O9Cl, a stoichiometric mixture of PbCl2 and H3BO3 was heated at 473 K for 10 h, cooled and ground, and then heated again at 873 K for 48 h. For Ba2B5O9Cl, a stoichiometric mixture of BaCl2·2H2O, BaCO3, Ba(OH)2, and H3BO3 was heated at 573 K for 10 h, cooled and ground, and then heated again at 1153 K for 48 h. The starting materials of PbCl2, BaCl2·2H2O, BaCO3, and H3BO3 were gathered from commercial sources without any purification.
XRD patterns of Ba2B5O9Cl and Pb2B5O9Cl were obtained on an automated Bruker D2 X-ray diffractometer equipped with a diffracted beam monochromator set for Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) at room temperature in the angular range of 2θ = 10° to 70° with a scan step of 0.01° and a fixed counting time of 0.1 s/step.
The diffuse reflectance spectrum was measured by a Shimadzu SolidSpec-3700DUV spectrophotometer at room temperature from 175 to 2600 nm.
Powder SHG effects were measured by using the Kurtz-Perry method with a Q-switched Nd: YVO4 solid-state laser at 1064 nm [72]. Polycrystalline samples of Ba2B5O9Cl and Pb2B5O9Cl were ground and sieved into the following particle size ranges: 38 to 55, 55 to 88, 88 to 105, 105 to 150, 150 to 200 μm. To make relevant comparisons with known SHG materials, the crystalline KDP sample was also ground and sieved into the same particle size ranges.
In this paper, the CASTEP package, a plane wave pseudo-potential method [73], was used for the DFT calculation of electronic structure properties. With the GGA-PBE functionals were chosen as the exchange-correlation functionals [74]. Norm-conserving pseudopotential [75] was used with the element valance states, Ba 5s25p66s2, Pb 5s25p65d106s26p2, B 2s22p1, O 2s22p4, F 2s22p5, Cl 3s23p5, and Br 4s24p5. The cutoff energies of M2Ba3(BO3)3Cl, M3B6O11F2, M2B5O9Cl, M2BO3Br, MB5O7F3 and MB2O3F2 (M = Ba2+, Pb2+) were all no more than 940 eV and the Monkhorst-Pack k-point grids were 3 × 3 × 3, 4 × 3 × 3, 6 × 1 × 4, 4 × 4 × 2, 4 × 4 × 3, and 5 × 5 × 4, respectively.
When the phase-matching condition is met, the SHG conversion efficiency of an NLO material is significantly determined by the SHG coefficients [76]. Also, the SHG coefficient components are relevant to second-order nonlinear susceptibilities, d = χ/2. Through the result of the band structure from the CASTEP package, the second-order nonlinear susceptibilities at the limit of zero frequency, χijk(2)(0), can be expressed as the sum of the contribution of the virtual-electron processes and the VH processes [19,71].
χijk2=χijk2VE+χijk2VH
χijk2VE=e32ℏm3∑vcc′∫d3k⃑4π3PijkImpvcipcc′jpc′vk1ωcv3ωvc′2+2ωvc4ωc′v
χijk2VH=e32ℏm3∑vv′c∫d3k⃑4π3PijkImpvv′ipv′cjpcvk1ωcv3ωv′c2+2ωvc4ωcv′
Here, i, j, and k are Cartesian components, v (v') and c (c') are valence and conduction bands, and P(ijk) represents full permutation.
Phonon spectra, powder XRD patterns, total and partial density of states, SHG density, comparison of typical NLO materials in bandgap and SHG response, structure information of predicted structures, and real-space atom-cutting results of SHG coefficients are shown in the Supplementary Materials.
1.
Oganov AR, Pickard CJ, Zhu Q, Needs RJ. Structure prediction drives materials discovery. Nat Rev Mater. 2019;4:331–348.
2.
Kang S, Jeong W, Hong C, Hwang S, Yoon Y, Han S. Accelerated identification of equilibrium structures of multicomponent inorganic crystals using machine learning potentials. npj Comput Mater. 2022;8:108.
3.
Becker P. Borate materials in nonlinear optics. Adv Mater. 1998;10(13):979–992.
4.
Wright LG, Wu FO, Christodoulides DN, Wise FW. Physics of highly multimode nonlinear optical systems. Nat Phys. 2022;18:1018–1030.
5.
Mutailipu M, Poeppelmeier KR, Pan SL. Borates: A rich source for optical materials. Chem Rev. 2021;121(3):1130–1202.
6.
Xiong L, Wu L-M, Chen L. A general principle for DUV NLO materials: π-conjugated confinement enlarges band gap. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2021;60(47):25063–25067.
7.
Kageyama H, Hayashi K, Maeda K, Attfield JP, Hiroi Z, Rondinelli JM, Poeppelmeier KR. Expanding frontiers in materials chemistry and physics with multiple anions. Nat Commun. 2018;9:772.
8.
Wu C, Wu TH, Jiang XX, Wang ZJ, Sha HY, Lin L, Lin ZS, Huang ZP, Long XF, Humphrey MG, et al. Large second-harmonic response and giant birefringence of CeF2(SO4) induced by highly polarizable polyhedra. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(11):4138–4142.
9.
Li Z, Xu B, Liang D, Pan A. Polarization-dependent optical properties and optoelectronic devices of 2D materials. Research. 2020;2020:Article 5464258.
10.
Harada JK, Charles N, Poeppelmeier KR, Rondinelli JM. Heteroanionic materials by design: Progress toward targeted properties. Adv Mater. 2019;31:Article 1805295.
11.
Knyrim JS, Becker P, Johrendt D, Huppertz H. A new non-centrosymmetric modification of BiB3O6. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45(48):8239–8241.
12.
Tran TT, Young J, Rondinelli JM, Halasyamani PS. Mixed-metal carbonate fluorides as deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(3):1285–1295.
13.
Wu B-L, Hu C-L, Mao F-F, Tang R-L, Mao J-G. Highly polarizable Hg2+ induced a strong second harmonic generation signal and large birefringence in LiHgPO4. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(26):10188–10192.
14.
Chen X, Ok KM. Recent advances in oxide-based nonlinear optical materials with wide infrared transparency beyond 6 μm. Chem Asian J. 2020;15(22):3709–3716.
15.
Dong XH, Huang L, Hu CF, Zeng HM, Lin ZE, Wang X, Ok KM, Zou GH. CsSbF2SO4: An excellent ultraviolet nonlinear optical sulfate with a KTiOPO4 (KTP)-type structure. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(20):6528–6534.
16.
Mutailipu M, Zhang M, Zhang BB, Wang LY, Yang ZH, Zhou X, Pan SL. SrB5O7F3 functionalized with [B5O9F3]6− chromophores: Accelerating the rational design of deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(21):6095–6099.
17.
Zhang F, Chen X, Zhang M, Jin W, Han S, Yang Z, Pan S. An excellent deep-ultraviolet birefringent material based on [BO2]∞ infinite chains. Light Sci Appl. 2022;11:252.
18.
Tran TT, Yu HW, Rondinelli JM, Poeppelmeier KR, Halasyamani PS. Deep ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Chem Mater. 2016;28(15):5238–5258.
19.
Rashkeev SN, Lambrecht WRL, Segall B. Efficient ab initio method for the calculation of frequency-dependent second-order optical response in semiconductors. Phys Rev B. 1998;57:3905–3919.
20.
Cyranoski D. China’s crystal cache. Nature. 2009;457:953–955.
21.
Chen CT, Wang GL, Wang XY, Xu ZY. Deep-UV nonlinear optical crystal KBe2BO3F2—Discovery, growth, optical properties and applications. Appl Phys B Lasers Opt. 2009;97:9–25.
22.
Hu C, Zhang BB, Lei B-H, Pan SL, Yang ZH. Advantageous units in antimony sulfides: Exploration and design of infrared nonlinear optical materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(31):26413–26421.
23.
Xia ZG, Poeppelmeier KR. Chemistry-inspired adaptable framework structures. Acc Chem Res. 2017;50(5):1222–1230.
24.
Wu HP, Yu HW, Yang ZH, Hou XL, Su X, Pan SL, Poeppelmeier KR, Rondinelli JM. Designing a deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material with a large second harmonic generation response. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(11):4215–4218.
25.
Zhang BB, Shi GQ, Yang ZH, Zhang FF, Pan SL. Fluorooxoborates: Beryllium-free deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials without layered growth. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(14):3916–3919.
26.
Huang Y-Z, Wu L-M, Wu X-T, Li L-H, Chen L, Zhang Y-F. Pb2B5O9I: An iodide borate with strong second harmonic generation. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(37):12788–12789.
27.
Zhang W-L, Cheng W-D, Zhang H, Geng L, Lin C-S, He Z-Z. A strong second-harmonic generation material Cd4BiO(BO3)3 originating from 3-chromophore asymmetric structures. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(5):1508–1509.
28.
Luo M, Song YX, Liang F, Ye N, Lin ZS. Pb2BO3Br: A novel nonlinear optical Lead borate bromine with a KBBF-type structure exhibiting strong nonlinear optical response. Inorg Chem Front. 2018;5(4):916–921.
29.
Song J-L, Hu C-L, Xu X, Kong F, Mao J-G. A facile synthetic route to a new SHG material with two types of parallel π-conjugated planar triangular units. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54(12):3679–3682.
30.
Yu HW, Koocher NZ, Rondinelli JM, Halasyamani PS. Pb2BO3I: A borate iodide with the largest second-harmonic generation (SHG) response in the KBe2BO3F2 (KBBF) family of nonlinear optical (NLO) materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(21):6100–6103.
31.
Dong XY, Jing Q, Shi YJ, Yang ZH, Pan SL, Poeppelmeier KR, Young J, Rondinelli JM. Pb2Ba3(BO3)3Cl: A material with large SHG enhancement activated by Pb-chelated BO3 groups. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(29):9417–9422.
32.
Zou GH, Lin CS, Jo H, Nam G, You T-S, Ok KM. Pb2BO3Cl: A tailor-made polar Lead borate chloride with very strong second harmonic generation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55(39):12078–12082.
33.
Hellwig H, Liebertz J, Bohatý L. Exceptional large nonlinear optical coefficients in the monoclinic bismuth borate BiB3O6 (BIBO). Solid State Commun. 1998;109(4):249–251.
34.
Yu HW, Pan SL, Wu HP, Zhao WW, Zhang FF, Li HY, Yang ZH. A new congruent-melting Oxyborate, Pb4O(BO3)2 with optimally aligned BO3 triangles adopting layered-type arrangement. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(5):2105–2110.
35.
Li HY, Wu HP, Su X, Yu HW, Pan SL, Yang ZH, Lu Y, Han J, Poeppelmeier KR. Pb3B6O11F2: The first non-centrosymmetric lead borate fluoride with a large second harmonic generation response. J Mater Chem C. 2014;2(9):1704–1710.
36.
Lin Y, Hu C-L, Mao J-G. K2Pb3(CO3)3F2 and KCdCO3F: Novel fluoride carbonates with layered and 3D framework structures. Inorg Chem. 2015;54(21):10407–10414.
37.
Yu HW, Wu HP, Pan SL, Yang ZH, Hou XL, Su X, Jing Q, Poeppelmeier KR, Rondinelli JM. Cs3Zn6B9O21: A chemically benign member of the KBBF family exhibiting the largest second harmonic generation response. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(4):1264–1267.
38.
Mutailipu M, Xie ZQ, Su X, Zhang M, Wang Y, Yang ZH, Janjua MRSA, Pan SL. Chemical cosubstitution-oriented design of rare-earth borates as potential ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(50):18397–18405.
39.
Wu HP, Yu HW, Zhang WG, Cantwell J, Poeppelmeier KR, Pan SL, Halasyamani PS. Top-seeded solution crystal growth and linear and nonlinear optical properties of Ba4B11O20F. Cryst Growth Des. 2017;17(3):1404–1410.
40.
Yu HW, Wu HP, Pan SL, Yang ZH, Su X, Zhang FF. A novel deep UV nonlinear optical crystal Ba3B6O11F2, with a new fundamental building block, B6O14 group. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(19):9665–9670.
41.
Zhao SG, Gong PF, Bai L, Xu X, Zhang SQ, Sun ZH, Lin ZS, Hong MC, Chen CT, Luo JH. Beryllium-free Li4Sr(BO3)2 for deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical applications. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4019.
42.
Zhao SG, Yang XY, Yang Y, Kuang XJ, Lu FQ, Shan P, Sun ZH, Lin ZS, Hong MC, Luo JH. Non-centrosymmetric RbNaMgP2O7 with unprecedented Thermo-induced enhancement of second harmonic generation. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(5):1592–1595.
43.
Mutailipu M, Zhang M, Wu HP, Yang ZH, Shen YH, Sun JL, Pan SL. Ba3Mg3(BO3)3F3 polymorphs with reversible phase transition and high performances as ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3089.
44.
Mori Y, Kuroda I, Nakajima S, Sasaki T, Nakai S. New nonlinear optical crystal: Cesium lithium borate. Appl Phys Lett. 1995;67(13):Article 1818.
45.
Ye N, Zeng WR, Jiang J, Wu BC, Chen CT. New nonlinear optical crystal K2Al2B2O7. J Opt Soc Am B. 2000;17:764–768.
46.
Zhao SG, Gong PF, Luo SY, Bai L, Lin ZS, Ji CM, Chen TL, Hong MC, Luo JH. Deep-ultraviolet transparent phosphates RbBa2(PO3)5 and Rb2Ba3(P2O7)2 show nonlinear optical activity from condensation of [PO4]3– Units. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(24):8560–8563.
47.
Wang XF, Wang Y, Zhang BB, Zhang FF, Yang ZH, Pan SL. CsB4O6F: A congruent-melting deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material by combining superior functional units. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(45):14119–14123.
48.
Peng G, Ye N, Lin ZS, Kang L, Pan SL, Zhang M, Lin CS, Long XF, Luo M, Chen Y, et al. NH4Be2BO3F2 and γ-Be2BO3F: Overcoming the layering habit in KBe2BO3F2 for the next-generation deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(29):8968–8972.
49.
Oseledchik YS, Prosvirnin AL, Pisarevskiy AI, Starshenko VV, Osadchuk VV, Belokrys SP, Svitanko NV, Korol AS, Krikunov SA, Selevich AF. New nonlinear optical crystals: Strontium and lead tetraborates. Opt Mater. 1995;4(6):669–674.
50.
Wang Y, Zhang BB, Yang ZH, Pan SL. Cation-tuned synthesis of fluorooxoborates: Towards optimal deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical materials. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(8):2150–2154.
51.
Xia MJ, Jiang XX, Lin ZS, Li RK. “All-three-in-one”: A new bismuth–tellurium–borate Bi3TeBO9 exhibiting strong second harmonic generation response. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(43):14190–14193.
52.
Zou GH, Huang L, Ye N, Lin CS, Cheng WD, Huang H. CsPbCO3F: A strong second-harmonic generation material derived from enhancement via p−π interaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135(49):18560–18566.
53.
Cong RH, Wang Y, Kang L, Zhou ZY, Lin ZS, Yang T. An outstanding second-harmonic generation material BiB2O4F: Exploiting the electron-withdrawing ability of fluorine. Inorg Chem Front. 2015;2(2):170–176.
54.
Luo M, Liang F, Song YX, Zhao D, Ye N, Lin ZS. Rational design of the first lead/tin fluorooxoborates MB2O3F2 (M = Pb, Sn), containing flexible two-dimensional [B6O12F6]∞ single layers with widely divergent second harmonic generation effects. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(22):6814–6817.
55.
Chen CT, Wu BC, Jiang AD, You GM. A new-type ultraviolet SHG crystal——β-BaB2O4. Sci Sin B. 1985;28(3):235–243.
56.
Wu HP, Pan SL, Poeppelmeier KR, Li HY, Jia DZ, Chen ZH, Fan XY, Yang Y, Rondinelli JM, Luo HS. K3B6O10Cl: A new structure analogous to perovskite with a large second harmonic generation response and deep UV absorption edge. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(20):7786–7790.
57.
Wu Y, Fu P, Wang J, Xu Z, Zhang L, Kong Y, Chen C. Characterization of CsB3O5 crystal for ultraviolet generation. Opt Lett. 1997;22(24):1840–1842.
58.
Lin SJ, Sun ZY, Wu BC, Chen CT. The nonlinear optical characteristics of a LiB3O5 crystal. J Appl Phys. 1990;67(2):634.
59.
Shi GQ, Wang Y, Zhang FF, Zhang BB, Yang ZH, Hou XL, Pan SL, Poeppelmeier KR. Finding the next deep-ultraviolet nonlinear optical material: NH4B4O6F. J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(31):10645–10648.
60.
Chen ZH, Pan SL, Yang ZH, Dong XY, Su X, Yang Y. Pb2B5O9Cl: A chloride borate with second harmonic generation effect. J Mater Sci. 2012;48:2590–2596.
61.
Han SJ, Mutailipu M, Tudi A, Yang ZH, Pan SL. PbB5O7F3: A high-performing short-wavelength nonlinear optical material. Chem Mater. 2020;32(5):2172–2179.
62.
Reckeweg O, Schulz A, DiSalvo FJ. Orthoborate halides with the formula (M+II)5(BO3)3X: Syntheses, crystal structures and Raman spectra of Eu5(BO3)3Cl and Ba5(BO3)3X (X = cl, Br). Z Naturforsch, B Chem Sci. 2011;66:359–365.
63.
Chen ZH, Pan SL, Zhao WW, Yang Y, Wu HP, Zhang FF. Study on synthesis, crystal growth and properties of nonlinear optical crystal Ba2B5O9Cl. J Synth Cryst. 2011;40:1394.
64.
Huang CM, Zhang FF, Li H, Yang ZH, Yu HH, Pan SL. BaB2O3F2: A barium Fluorooxoborate with a unique ∞2B2O3F− layer and short cutoff edge. Chem Eur J. 2019;25(27):6693–6697.
65.
Henkelman G, Arnaldsson A, Jónsson H. A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density. Comput Mater Sci. 2006;36(3):354–360.
66.
Tang W, Sanville E, Henkelman G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J Phys Condens Matter. 2009;21:Article 084204.
67.
Chan MKY, Ceder G. Efficient band gap prediction for solids. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(19):Article 196403.
68.
Krukau AV, Vydrov OA, Izmaylov AF, Scuseria GE. Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals. J Chem Phys. 2006;125(125):Article 224106.
69.
Walsh A, Payne DJ, Egdell RG, Watson GW. Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: Revision of the classical lone pair model. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(9):4455–4463.
70.
Li DN, Jing Q, Lei C, Pan SL, Zhang BB, Yang ZH. Theoretical perspective of the lone pair activity influence on band gap and SHG response of Lead borates. RSC Adv. 2015;5(97):79882–79887.
71.
Lin J, Lee M-H, Liu Z-P, Chen CT, Pickard CJ. Mechanism for linear and nonlinear optical effects in β – BaB2O4 crystals. Phys Rev B. 1999;60(19):13380–13389.
72.
Kurtz SK, Perry TT. A powder technique for the evaluation of nonlinear optical materials. J Appl Phys. 1968;39(8):3798.
73.
Clark SJ, Segall MD, Pickard CJ, Hasnip PJ, Probert MIJ, Refson K, Payne MC. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z Kristallogr. 2005;220:567–570.
74.
Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;77(18):3865–3868.
75.
Rappe AM, Rabe KM, Kaxiras E, Joannopoulos JD. Optimized pseudopotentials. Phys Rev B. 1990;41(2):1227–1230.
76.
Lin ZS, Jiang XX, Kang L, Gong PF, Luo SY, Lee M-H. First-principles materials applications and design of nonlinear optical crystals. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2014;47:Article 253001.
Year 2023 volume 6 Issue 3
PDF
71
39
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/research.0053
  • Receive Date:2022-11-20
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2023-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-11-20
  • Accepted:2023-01-02
Affiliations
    1Research Center for Crystal Materials, CAS Key Laboratory of Functional Materials and Devices for Special Environments, Xinjiang Technical Institute of Physics & Chemistry, CAS, 40–1 South Beijing Road, Urumqi 830011, China.
    2Center of Materials Science and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

Corresponding:

* Address correspondence to: (Z.Y.)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/research.0053
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT