收藏切换
Rational Design of Thermosensitive Hydrogel to Deliver Nanocrystals with Intranasal Administration for Brain Targeting in Parkinson’s Disease
收藏切换
PDF
Yun Tan1, Yao Liu2, Yujing Liu2, Rui Ma2, Jingshan Luo2, Huijie Hong3, Xiaojia Chen3, Shengpeng Wang3, Chuntai Liu4, Yi Zhang1, Tongkai Chen2
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 9812523
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 9812523
• Research Article •
Rational Design of Thermosensitive Hydrogel to Deliver Nanocrystals with Intranasal Administration for Brain Targeting in Parkinson’s Disease
Full
Yun Tan1, Yao Liu2, Yujing Liu2, Rui Ma2, Jingshan Luo2, Huijie Hong3, Xiaojia Chen3, Shengpeng Wang3, Chuntai Liu4, Yi Zhang1, Tongkai Chen2
Affiliations
  • 1Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Micro & Nano Materials Interface Science, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
  • 2Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
  • 3State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
  • 4Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Mold, Ministry of Education, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

Y. Tan and Y. Liu conceived the idea, designed the experiments, performed the experiments and the data analysis, and wrote original draft. Y. J. Liu, R. Ma, J. S Luo, H. J. Hong, X. J. Chen, S. P. Wang, and C. T. Liu performed the data analysis and investigation. Y. Zhang and T. K. Chen contributed to writing and editing the manuscript, provided conceptualization and methodology, and found funding support. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript. Yun Tan and Yao Liu contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2021-11-20 doi: 10.34133/2021/9812523
Outline
收藏切换

Mitochondrial dysfunction is commonly detected in individuals suffering from Parkinson’s disease (PD), presenting within the form of excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation as well as energy metabolism. Overcoming this dysfunction within brain tissues is an effective approach to treat PD, while unluckily, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) substantially impedes intracerebral drug delivery. In an effort to improve the delivery of efficacious therapeutic drugs to the brain, a drug delivery platform hydrogel (MAG-NCs@Gel) was designed by complexing magnolol (MAG)-nanocrystals (MAG-NCs) into the noninvasive thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) with self-gelation. The as-prepared MAG-NCs@Gel exhibited obvious improvements in drug solubility, the duration of residence with the nasal cavity, and the efficiency of brain targeting, respectively. Above all, continuous intranasal MAG-NCs@Gel delivery enabled MAG to cross the BBB and enter dopaminergic neurons, thereby effectively alleviating the symptoms of MPTP-induced PD. Taking advantage of the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior of this delivery platform increases its viscoelasticity in nasal cavity, thus improving the efficiency of MAG-NCs transit across the BBB. As such, MAG-NCs@Gel represented an effective delivery platform capable of normalizing ROS and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in the mitochondria of dopaminergic neurons, consequently reversing the mitochondrial dysfunction and enhancing the behavioral skills of PD mice without adversely affecting normal tissues.

Yun Tan, Yao Liu, Yujing Liu, Rui Ma, Jingshan Luo, Huijie Hong, Xiaojia Chen, Shengpeng Wang, Chuntai Liu, Yi Zhang, Tongkai Chen. Rational Design of Thermosensitive Hydrogel to Deliver Nanocrystals with Intranasal Administration for Brain Targeting in Parkinson’s Disease[J]. Research, 2021 , 2021 (11) : 9812523 - . DOI: 10.34133/2021/9812523
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is one of the most severe neurodegenerative diseases which affects approximately 2% of individuals over the age of 65, resulting in motor and nonmotor dysfunction because of the degenerating the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra [1–3]. PD incidence among younger individuals has been rising in recent years and therefore represents a major threat to global public health [4]. At present, drug-based therapeutics are the primary tools used to treat PD, with dopamine receptor agonists, monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, and the dopamine precursor levodopa being the main treatments [5, 6]. These pharmacological agents can slacken disease progression, alleviate symptoms, and thereby improve patient quality of life. However, most of known drugs are incapable of efficiently penetrating the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cause substantial systemic adverse effects, limiting their clinical utility [7, 8].
The intranasal delivery of PD drugs is often considered to be preferable owing to its ability to decrease systemic drug delivery while by passing the selectivity of the BBB to directly transport pharmacological agents into the brain via the trigeminal and olfactory systems that link the external environment directly to the central nervous system (CNS) [9–11]. In recent years, natural products, as promising resources with sustainable and low toxicity, have attracted considerable attentions in the treatment of PD by nasal administration [12–14]. In addition, by evading first-pass hepatic metabolism, this approach also reduces the rates of drug degradation. Several nanoparticle-based strategies, such as solid lipid nanoparticles [15, 16], nanoemulsions [17], liposomes [18], polymeric micelles [19, 20], and cyclodextrin derived [21] have been used to achieve efficient intranasal drug delivery to date. Nanocrystal- (NC-) based delivery platforms are particularly promising in this therapeutic context, as they consist of small crystals (<500 nm) stabilized with surfactants or polymeric steric stabilizers [22, 23]. The NC delivery platforms enable researchers to achieve targeted therapy and efficient treatment and contribute to transform the balance from side effect therapy to a beneficial one [24, 25]. After production, these NCs can be loaded with drugs of interest at high levels without organic solvents and remain highly stable and less toxic than other nanoscale drug delivery platforms. Despite those innovative advances in fabrication, structural characterization, and formation mechanism [26, 27], as well as the tests of in vitro therapeutic efficacy [28], the clinical application of most NCs has been hindered by their poor solubility and strong self-aggregation tendency [29]. To establish a rational NC-based drug carrier system within the nasal cavity still remains a great challenge.
Hydrogel function is treated as ideal drug carriers owing to their ability to overcome a range of limitations [30–33]. In particular, thermosensitive hydrogels can be prepared and loaded with drugs under relatively mild conditions, exhibiting thermally controlled drug loading/unloading behavior when applied to the nasal mucosa in the form of an injectable preparation owing to their shear thinning properties [34–36]. Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) hydrogel is a typical thermosensitive hydrogel with reversible lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior owing to its temperature-dependent hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity [37–39]. The LCST of PNIPAM hydrogels is typically approximately 32°C [40]. The exposure of these hydrogels to warmer temperatures within the nasal cavity can result in increased hydrogel viscoelasticity, thereby reducing the rate of mucociliary clearance and ensuring gradual sustained drug release. Such a thermosensitive hydrogel delivery system has offered great potential to improve drug potency and to absorb significant amounts of water or biological fluids [41, 42]. Meanwhile, these hydrogels are also both biocompatible and biodegradable, making them ideal tools for clinical application.
Inspired by abovementioned pioneering works and integrating our previous experience [8, 43, 44], we attempted to employ the hydroxylated biphenol derived from the ‘Houpo’ herb (Magnolia officinalis) known as magnolol (MAG) as a model drug, as it is commonly studied to treat PD [45, 46]. To improve the solubility, stability, and bioavailability characteristics of MAG, PVP-K30 was used to stabilize MAG-containing NCs (MAG-NCs). Further, in order to construct the MAG-NCs@emulsion, the as-developed MAG-NCs were then uniformly dispersed into an emulsion of thermosensitive PNIPAM, which was obtained by in situ free radical polymerization of precursor (Figure 1(a)). Following, as a self-gelation process, it is wonderful that the MAG-NCs@emulsion polymer changed from a fluid to a solid-like state during natural cooling, yielding the transparent polymer network MAG-NCs@Gel (Movie S1). This MAG-NCs@Gel preparation was then intranasally injected into experimental model mice, whereupon it was able to penetrate the BBB to achieve effective drug release, thereby targeting mitochondria within neurons to reduce ROS generation and increase ATP levels as a treatment for PD (Figure 1(b)). The thermosensitive hydrogel will happen in phase transition and exhibit the characteristics of opacity and volume shrinkage, when the temperature is higher than the LCST of the hydrogel [47, 48]. According to the relationship between the transparency of the hydrogels and the temperature, the LCST of MAG-NCs@Gel and blank gel have been determined at about ~32.2°C and 32.4°C, respectively (Figure S1). Since the body temperature (of murine and rats) is higher than the LCST of MAG-NCs@Gel, the volume of MAG-NCs@Gel will shrink to some extent in these animals. In addition, storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G″) of MAG-NCs@Gel increased with rising temperature (Figure S2), indicating that MAG-NCs@Gel with slightly contracted volume exhibited better viscoelasticity in the nasal cavity than the external body. Therefore, these rationally designed MAG-NCs@Gel preparations were able to overcome limited MAG solubility within aqueous environments, while simultaneously achieving prolonged MAG residence in the nasal cavity. Importantly, encapsulated MAG-NCs were able to efficiently transit across the BBB, thus improving their cerebral bioavailability and enabling the targeted treatment of PD.
The dynamic light scattering (DLS) was initially used to assess the hydrated particle size of MAG-NCs, which exhibited a mean diameter of 81.57±1.48 nm and the mean particle distribution index (PDI) of 0.11±0.02 (Figure S3a), and the mean hydrated MAG-NC particle size for storage one month was still 81-84 nm with PDI of 0.1-0.2 (Figure S3b), these indicating that MAG-NC remained stable for a month or more. Relative to the sizes of hydrated particles detected via DLS, TEM imaging suggested MAG-NCs to be somewhat smaller about 30 nm (Figure S3c), because TEM images revealed the true size of the drug NCs without accounting for the PVP-K30 coating or the electric double layer. To further confirm MAG-NC stability, TEM images of MAG-NCs were captured following storage for two weeks, revealing that particles were still well dispersed, neither agglomeration nor dissociation (Figure S3d). Meanwhile, SEM images of freeze-dried MAG-NCs@Gel indicated the uniform distribution of MAG-NCs within honeycomb polymer network, and the size of MAG-NCs was about 50-70 nm (Figure 1(a)). The SEM of the blank hydrogel shows the homogeneous polymer network, except without MAG-NCs (Figure S4). In addition, those MAG-NCs were also clearly observed in SEM images of MAG-NCs@Gel following a two-week storage at room temperature, suggesting that MAG-NCs@Gel preparations are highly stable (Figure S5). Besides, TEM images of MAG-NCs@Gel preparations show the size of MAG-NCs to range from 20 to 30 nm, which was closed to that of the MAG-NC dispersion (Figure 1(b)). FT-IR spectra of MAG-NCs@Gel displayed the presence of absorption peaks at 1635 cm-1 (C=O), 1530 cm-1 (N-H of amide), 1455 cm-1 (C-H), and 3291 cm-1 (N-H stretching vibration peak of GelMA) (Figure S6) [49]. Owing to the very low MAG-NC content in these samples (<0.2 wt%), no characteristic peak of MAG-NCs was detectable. Rheological studies were then performed exploring the viscoelasticity and injectability of MAG-NCs@Gel [50, 51]. Based upon the dependence of the G′ and G″ of MAG-NCs@Gel on the oscillation strain (Figure S7), the reversible gel state to flow state transition was determined to occur at ~80% strain (gel state: G′>G″ and flow state: G′<G″) [52]. Similarly, the gel-flow state transition of the blank hydrogel also occurred at 80% strain. Step-strain measurements with 5 times cycle revealed that G′ was higher than G″ at low strain (1%), whereas at higher strain levels (200%), G′ was lower than G″ (Figure S8). Those results suggested that the MAG-NCs@Gel exhibited self-healing properties [53]. In frequency sweep analyses, the G′ and G″ of MAG-NCs increased with increasing angular frequency, and G′ was always greater than G″, so that gel characteristics were observed across the entire frequency range (Figure 2(c)). Relative to MAG-NCs@Gel, the G′ and G″ of the blank hydrogel were smaller, although they were similarly dependent upon angular frequency (Figure S9). This suggests that interactions between MAG-NCs and polymer networks can enhance MAG-NCs@Gel viscoelasticity to some degree. MAG-NCs@Gel shear thinning was assessed based upon the association between the viscosity and shear rate (Figure 2(d)). The viscosity declines as the shear rate increases, suggesting that this hydrogel exhibits promising injectable properties (Figure 2(e), Movie S2) [54, 55]. In order to obtain the release performance of MAG-NCs@Gel polymer network for MAG-NCS, in vitro nasal mucosa permeation assays were carried out, the results indicated that ~100% of MAG-NCs were released from MAG-NCs@Gel within 72 h (Figure 2(f)), in which the permeation efficiency was higher than the MAG group (~30.7%) and more durable release time as compared to the MAG-NCs group (Figure S10). These results suggested that MAG-NCs@Gel hydrogel loading significantly improved in vitro release and prolonged the overall drug release duration through the interaction between polymer and MAG-NCs to construct the suitable network structure.
To assess the neuroprotective properties of MAG and MAG-NC preparations within the context of MPP+-induced cytotoxicity, SH-SY5Y cell survival following treatment with these preparations was assessed via MTT assay [56]. At concentrations below 160  μM, no significant cytotoxicity was observed for MAG or MAG-NCs (Figure S11). Meanwhile, neuroprotection was evaluated by treating SH-SY5Y cells with MAG or MAG-NCs (30  μM). Cells treated with MPP+ (2 mM) exhibited a survival rate of just 54.1% compared to the control group (100% cell survival rate), whereas cells treated with MAG and MAG-NCs at the 30  μM concentration exhibited respective viability values of 79.1% and 92.8% (Figure 3(a)). Even treatment with lower MAG and MAG-NC concentrations (7.5  μM or 15  μM) was associated with improved cell survival relative to the MPP+ group, although these effects were not as robust as those following treatment at the 30  μM dose (Figure S12). Notably, the neuroprotective efficacy of MAG-NC preparations was superior to that of equivalent MAG concentrations. Consistently, CLSM images of SH-SY5Y cells stained implementing AM-PI (green-red) were prepared, with red and green fluorescence, respectively, corresponding to apoptotic and viable cells (Figure 3(b)). While control samples exhibited no evidence of cellular apoptosis, significant neurotoxic cell death was evident in the MPP+ model group, whereas both the 30  μM MAG-NCs and 30  μM MAG groups exhibited significant increases in the proportion of live cells, with this effect being more pronounced in the MAG-NCs group as compared to the MAG group. Flow cytometry analyses were further performed to quantify the neuroprotective effects of these preparations (Figure 3(c)), revealing respective frequencies of initial and tardy apoptotic cells in the MAG and MAG-NCs groups of 22.6% and 14.8%, with these rates being higher than those in the control group (~5%), but much lower than those in the MPP+ group (~36.9%). Mitochondrial membrane potential measurements also yielded similar results (Figure 3(d)). Mitochondria are the main place for ATP production and an important organelle to promote cell energy conversion. The decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential is a landmark event in the early stage of apoptosis. The percentage of apoptotic cells in the control, MPP+, MAG, and MAG-NCs groups was 5.86%, 36.43%, 23.1%, and 15.1%, respectively, confirming that MAG-NCs were associated with superior antiapoptotic efficacy.
MAG pharmacokinetic studies were performed in rats at a 1.0 mg/kg dose. In plasma pharmacokinetic analyses (Figure S13a), intranasally administered MAG-NCs@Gel was associated with sustained MAG detection in the plasma over 12 h postadministration, whereas plasma MAG levels in rats intravenously injected with MAG were only detectable in the first 3 hours (Table S1), and MAG-NC treatment prolonged the MAG circulation to the 6 hours. The MAG-NCs@Gel group exhibited a MAG Tmax of 3.50±0.55 h and Cmax of 25.13±3.87 ng/mL, whereas for MAG-NCs these values were 0.083 h and 128.87 ± 18.06 ng/mL, respectively (Table S2), indicating that intranasal MAG-NCs@Gel administration is associated with sustained and controlled drug release. Furthermore, the T1/2 of the MAG-NCs@Gel group (3.05±0.41 h) was over 2-fold higher than that in both the MAG and MAG-NCs groups, consistent with the prolongation of plasma release time for MAG-NCs loaded into PNIAM hydrogel as compared to free MAG-NCs. Consistently, 10.14-fold and 3.34-fold increase in the MRT0−t value for MAG were detected in rats in the MAG-NCs@Gel group (5.68±0.47 h) relative to the MAGi.v. group (0.56 ± 0.15 h) and MAG-NCs group (1.70 ± 0.22 h), respectively. Furthermore, the AUC0−t in MAG-NCs@Gel-treated animals was 302.07±29.86 ng h mL-1, which was 7.47 times, 5.92 times, and 3.38 times higher than that observed for rats in the MAGi.v. group (40.43±4.17 ng h mL-1), MAGi.n. (50.97±6.09 ng h mL-1), and MAG-NCs group (89.27±10.23 ng h mL-1). These results thus indicated that MAG-NCs improved the bioavailability of MAG, and MAG-NCs loaded with a thermosensitive hydrogel may be associated with better gradual MAG release, protecting against rapid loss of drug and facilitating effective drug release.
Direct delivery of medications to the brain is one of the most promising approaches to effectively treating PD. Therefore, drug pharmacokinetics within the brain is a key consideration when evaluating potential PD therapeutics. The association between MAG concentrations and time in the brain was thus assessed following its intranasal or intravenous administration (Figure S13b), and related pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. The Tmax value in animals in the MAG-NCs@Gel group (4.67±1.03 h) was 9.34 times and 7.4 times that of animals in the MAGi.v. group (0.5±0 h) and MAG-NCs group (0.63±0.31 h), respectively. The Cmax for the MAG-NCs@Gel group was also markedly increased relative to the MAGi.v., MAGi.n., and MAG-NCs groups (131.75±10.21 ng/g vs. 22.85±3.94, 33.01±4.03, and 34.76±3.19 ng/g). The T1/2 (11.51±1.42 h) and Tmax of the MAG-NCs@Gel group were also longer in the brain relative to the plasma, suggesting that the majority of administered MAG was effectively absorbed within the brain. The AUC0−t in the MAG-NCs@Gel group was 2555.69±336.17 ng h g-1, with this value being 27.4-fold higher than that in the MAG-NCs group (93.24±10.96 ng h g-1). In summary, these results suggested that continuous drug delivery and effective BBB penetration were achieved in the MAG-NCs@Gel group by utilizing controlled-release MAG-NCs encapsulated within a PNIPAM hydrogel. These data indicated that MAG-NCs@Gel with DTE% and DTP% values of 809.98% and 87.65% were able to efficiently deliver MAG to the brain.
To confirm the satisfactory therapeutic efficacy of MAG-NCs@Gel as a treatment for the behavioral deficits of MPTP-induced mice, a series of comprehensive experiments was performed (Figure 4(a)). Initially, MPTP was administered for mice (18 mg kg-1), resulting in significant motor behavioral deficits [57]. The effects of intranasal MAG-NCs@Gel administration on these deficits were then assessed, with mice being examined using the rotarod, pole, and open field tests seven days later. On day eight of this study, mice were then euthanized, and immunohistochemical staining for DA and its metabolites, blood analyses, and tests of hepatic and renal functionality were conducted. MPTP induces motor symptoms including impaired coordination and balance, bradykinesia, and diminished spontaneous motor performance. In rotarod tests, mice treated with MAG or L-DOPA exhibited significant improvements relative to MPTP-treated model mice (Figure 4(b)), with the values of time to reach the bottom (T-total) and time to turn (T-turn) (8.35±0.71 s and 1.73±0.15 s) in the MAG-NCs@Gel group being lower than those in the MAG group (3.37±0.27 s and 13.31±1.01 s) and the MAG-NCs group (2.81±0.20 s and 11.08±0.94 s), consistent with the optimal therapeutic efficacy of MAG-NCs@Gel preparations. Relative to other MAG treatments, the MAG-NCs@Gel group exhibited similar improvements in the pole test (Figure 4(c)), wherein MAG-NCs@Gel-treated mice exhibited prolonged fall latency and a reduced number of drops. There was also a significant increase in average travel distance and speed in the MAG-NCs@Gel group relative to other experimental groups in the open field test (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)). In summary, these behavioral tests indicated that MAG-NCS@Gel treatment was associated with excellent therapeutic efficacy as a treatment for MPTP-induced motor dysfunction, which was comparable to that detected in mice treated with L-DOPA.
MPTP-induced neurotoxicity results in the loss or death of TH+ neurons in the midbrain substantia nigra together with reductions in levels of homovanillic acid (HVA) and striatal DA, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC). Fluorescent images of TH+ neurons clearly emphasized the protective influences of MAG-NCs@Gel treatment against MPTP-induced neurotoxicity, with these results being better than those in the MAG or MAG-NCs groups (Figure 5(a)). Notably, the protective efficacy in the MAG-NCs@Gel group and the L-DOPA group were similar, with respective protection levels that were 92.94±7.66% and 91.59±7.84% of those in the control group, respectively (Figure 4(b)). In addition, MPTP treatment rapidly reduced striatal DA, DOPAC, and HVA levels, whereas all experimental treatments significantly increased these levels. The protective effect on neurons of MAG-NCs had been confirmed in the in vitro experiment. Importantly, these improvements were most robust in the MAG-NCs@Gel group relative to other MAG treatment groups (Figure S14), indicating that this drug release platform was able to effectively protect against MPTP-induced TH+ neuron death and loss while improving the DA and DA metabolites levels within the striatum.
One of the most valuable noninvasive imaging tools for monitoring changes in the cerebral blood flow in vivo is PET, and it is thus widely used to diagnose PD and other neurodegenerative diseases, including those where in neuronal dysfunction precedes structural change. In such analyses, 18F-FDG is primarily employed to trace the utilization of glucose within the brain and associated PD-related metabolic changes. In this study, 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging was conducted to assess cerebral glucose metabolism in mice with MPTP-induced PD on day 7. Relative to control animals, those in the treated MPTP group exhibited significantly decreased 18F-FDG uptake, consistent with metabolic abnormalities (Figure 5(c)). However, such energy metabolism was clearly restored to levels close to those in control animals following MAG-NCs@Gel treatment. The energy metabolism levels in these mice were improved to some degree in the MAG and MAG-NCs groups as well, although the effects were not as robust as those in the MAG-NCs@Gel group (Figure S15). When further assessing changes in cerebellar glucose metabolism (MRglc), the cerebellar MRglc levels of mice in the MAG-NCs@Gel group remained at 2.058±0.171 and were close to the levels in control animals and higher than levels in animals in any other experimental treatment groups (Figure 5(d)). Changes in body weight over time following drug treatment can additionally reflect the restoration of normal MRglc. Relative to the steady weight gain observed in the control group, mice in the L-DOPA or MAG group initially exhibited some degree of weight loss followed by gradual weight increases, consistent with MRglc recovery (Figure S16). To establish the protective effects of this MAG-NCs@Gel sustained-release platform on mitochondrial function within the midbrain MAG-NCs platform on midbrain mitochondria, MPTP-induced PD model animals were again utilized. In this model system, MPTP is converted into toxic MPP+ within dopaminergic neurons, wherein it agglomerates within the mitochondrial and blocks complex I of the electron transport chain. Mitochondrial function in treated animals was assessed by measuring ATP, ROS, and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels. As demonstrated in Figure 5(e), the level of ATP in the MPTP group (33.54±2.98 ng mL-1) decreased significantly relative to the control group (53.64±4.33 ng mL-1). Relative to the MPTP group, the ATP levels in the MAG-NCs@Gel group (52.13±4.82 ng mL-1) significantly increased, approaching levels in the control and L-DOPA groups (Figure S17a). ROS levels in MPTP model animals were roughly twofold higher than those in control animals (Figure 5(f)), while levels of the oxidative stress indicator MDA were similarly increased in the MPTP group (Figure 5(g)). Following MAG-NCs@Gel treatment, ROS and MDA levels returned to normal, consistent with the excellent therapeutic efficacy of this therapeutic platform within this murine model system owing to its ability to efficiently reverse MPTP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. MDA and ROS levels were also decreased in other treatment groups, but these effects were not as pronounced as in the MAG-NCs@Gel group (Figure S17b and c). The mechanism whereby this MAG-NCs@Gel release platform can treat mitochondrial dysfunction is summarized in Figure 5(h). Initially, MAG-NCs are continuously released from the PNIPAM hydrogel and can readily pass through the BBB whereupon they enter dopaminergic neurons via endocytosis to regulate mitochondrial ATP, ROS, and MDA levels so that they return to normal, thereby abrogating MPTP-induced neurotoxicity and facilitating neuroprotection. The behavioral skills of animals in these studies improved significantly to near baseline levels, thus confirming the effective treatment of PD in these animals.
Following a 7-day treatment period, MAG-NCs@Gel biocompatibility following intranasal administration was assessed by examining nasal mucosal sections, performing routine blood analyses, and assessing organ inflammation or lesions. Relative to samples from the control group, no evidence of inflammation or structural damage was observed in samples from animals treated with blank hydrogels or different MAG treatments (Figure S18). Additionally, no differences in routine blood analysis parameters (WBC, RBC, and PLT) were observed in the MAG treatment groups relative to the control or L-DOPA treatment groups (Figures 6(a)–6(c)). Consistently, routine blood parameters (HGB, MCV, MCH, MCHC, and HCT) were also normal in these animals (Figure S19). H&E-stained sections of major tissues including the liver and kidneys exhibited no evidence of inflammation or injury in any treatment group (Figure 6(d)), with no evidence of inflammation in the heart, lung, brain, or spleen sections from animals in the MAG-NCs@Gel group or other treatment groups (Figure S20). Given the synthetic nature of the PNIAM hydrogel, there is an associated risk of organ rejection or dysfunction, but no such abnormalities were observed when assessing liver and kidney function in treated mice (Figures 6(e)–6(g) and Figure S21). Therefore, these data suggested that our MAG-NCs@Gel sustained-release system exhibited satisfactory biocompatibility following intranasal injection, making it of potential value for the treatment of PD.
In summary, this study developed a thermosensitive PNIPAM hydrogel for encapsulating MAG-NCs to facilitate sustained drug delivery following intranasal administration, thereby effectively treating a murine model of PD owing to associated self-gelation processes. It is needed to point out that the presence of MAG-NCs enhances the stability and strength of PNIPAM hydrogel, indicating the synergic action of weak interactions among MAG-NCs and PNIPAM chains. The LCST behavior of the drug delivery platform prolonged the residence time of MAG-NCs in the nasal cavity so that these MAG-NCs were able to readily cross the BBB to achieve the targeted regulation of ROS and ATP levels in dopaminergic neurons in the context of MPTP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. MAG-NCs@Gel treatment was associated with significant reductions in dopaminergic neuron neurotoxicity in PD model mice, with concomitant improvements in neuroprotection and motor behavior. Importantly, this drug delivery platform also exhibited satisfactory biocompatibility without any evident side effects.
Together, these results underscore the potential value of intranasal MAG-NCs@Gel injection for the treatment of PD, overcoming key limitations to traditional drug delivery such as the rapid loss of drugs from the nasal cavity and the restricted capability of drugs to cross the BBB. In addition, the work may realize controlled transmembrane of drug NCs and targeted treatment for Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and other neurodegenerative diseases.
  • Key Project of Basic Research of Shenzhen(JCYJ20200109113603854)
  • Macau SAR(0098/2020/A)
  • Research Fund of University of Macau(MYRG2018-00207-ICMS; MYRG2019-00121-ICMS)
  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2019B1515120043)
  • Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department(2019TP1001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(21972169; 21773311)
1
Masliah E., Rockenstein E., Veinbergs I., Mallory M., Hashimoto M., Takeda A., Sagara Y., Sisk A., and Mucke L., “Dopaminergic loss and inclusion body formation in α-Synuclein mice: implications for neurodegenerative disorders,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5456, pp. 1265–1269, 2000
2
Poewe W., Seppi K., Tanner C. M., Halliday G. M., Brundin P., Volkmann J., Schrag A. E., and Lang A. E., “Parkinson disease,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 21, 2017
3
Zhao D., Feng P. J., Liu J. H., Dong M., Shen X. Q., Chen Y. X., and Shen Q. D., “Electromagnetized-nanoparticle-modulated neural plasticity and recovery of degenerative dopaminergic neurons in the mid-brain,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 43, article 2003800, 2020
4
Liu J., Liu C., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Liu K., Song J.-X., Sreenivasmurthy S. G., Wang Z., Shi Y., Chu C., Zhang Y., Wu C., Deng X., Liu X., Song J., Zhuang R., Huang S., Zhang P., Li M., Wen L., Zhang Y. W., and Liu G., “A self-assembled α-Synuclein nanoscavenger for Parkinson's disease,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1533–1549, 2020
5
Kuder K. J., Zaluski M., Schabikowski J., Latacz G., Olejarz-Maciej A., Jasko P., Doroz-Plonka A., Brockmann A., Muller C. E., and Kiec-Kononowicz K., “Novel, dual target-directed annelated xanthine derivatives acting on adenosine receptors and monoamine oxidase B,” ChemMedChem, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 772–786, 2020
6
Bologna M., Paparella G., Fasano A., Hallett M., and Berardelli A., “Evolving concepts on bradykinesia,” Brain, vol. 143, no. 3, pp. 727–750, 2020
7
Chen Z. M., Liu F. Y., Chen Y. K., Liu J., Wang X. Y., Chen A. T., Deng G., Zhang H. Y., Liu J., Hong Z. Y., and Zhou J. B., “Targeted delivery of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated cancer gene therapy via liposome-templated hydrogel nanoparticles,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 27, no. 46, article 1703036, 2017
8
Xiong S., Li Z., Liu Y., Wang Q., Luo J., Chen X., Xie Z., Zhang Y., Zhang H., and Chen T., “Brain-targeted delivery shuttled by black phosphorus nanostructure to treat Parkinson's disease,” Biomaterials, vol. 260, article 120339, 2020
9
Pandit R., Chen L. Y., and Götz J., “The blood-brain barrier: physiology and strategies for drug delivery,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 165-166, pp. 1–14, 2020
10
Garcia-Pardo J., Novio F., Nador F., Cavaliere I., Suarez-Garcia S., Lope-Piedrafita S., Candiota A. P., Romero-Gimenez J., Rodriguez-Galvan B., Bove J., Vila M., Lorenzo J., and Ruiz-Molina D., “Bioinspired theranostic coordination polymer nanoparticles for intranasal dopamine replacement in Parkinson's disease,” ACS Nano, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 8592–8609, 2021
11
Zhou H., Niu L., Meng L., Lin Z., Zou J., Xia X., Huang X., Zhou W., Bian T., and Zheng H., “Noninvasive ultrasound deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease model mouse,” Research, vol. 2019, article 1748489, 2019
12
Wu C. Y., Li B. Y., Zhang Y., Chen T. T., Chen C. R., Jiang W., Wang Q., and Chen T. K., “Intranasal delivery of paeoniflorin nanocrystals for brain targeting,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 326–335, 2020
13
Li S. C., Sun X., Bi L., Tong Y. J., and Liu X., “Research Progress on Natural Product Ingredients’ Therapeutic Effects on Parkinson’s Disease by Regulating Autophagy,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2021, –11, 2021
14
de Oliveira Junior E. R., Truzzi E., Ferraro L., Fogagnolo M., Pavan B., Beggiato S., Rustichelli C., Maretti E., Lima E. M., Leo E., and Dalpiaz A., “Nasal administration of nanoencapsulated geraniol/ursodeoxycholic acid conjugate: towards a new approach for the management of Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 321, pp. 540–552, 2020
15
Agrawal M., Saraf S., Saraf S., Dubey S. K., Puri A., Gupta U., Kesharwani P., Ravichandiran V., Kumar P., Naidu V. G. M., Murty U. S., Ajazuddin, and Alexander A., “Stimuli-responsive In situ gelling system for nose-to-brain drug delivery,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 327, pp. 235–265, 2020
16
Zheng C., Li M., and Ding J., “Challenges and opportunities of nanomedicines in clinical translation,” BIO Integration, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–60, 2021
17
Ahmad E., Feng Y. H., Qi J. P., Fan W. F., Ma Y. H., He H. S., Xia F., Dong X. C., Zhao W. L., Lu Y., and Wu W., “Evidence of nose-to-brain delivery of nanoemulsions: cargoes but not vehicles,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1174–1183, 2017
18
Wang J., Li P. Y., Yu Y., Fu Y. H., Jiang H. Y., Lu M., Sun Z. P., Jiang S. B., Lu L., and Wu M. X., “Pulmonary surfactant-biomimetic nanoparticles potentiate heterosubtypic influenza immunity,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6480, article aau0810, 2020
19
Zhang Z. K., Liu C. R., Li C., Wu W., and Jiang X. Q., “Shape effects of cylindrical versus spherical unimolecular polymer nanomaterials on in vitro and in vivo behaviors,” Research, vol. 2019, article 2391486, 2019
20
Wei L., Chen J., and Ding J. J. N., “Sequentially stimuli-responsive anticancer nanomedicines,” Nanomedicine, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 261–264, 2021
21
Kobari S., Kusakabe T., Momota M., Shibahara T., Hayashi T., Ozasa K., Morita H., Matsumoto K., Saito H., Ito S., Kuroda E., and Ishii K. J., “IL-33 is essential for adjuvant effect of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodexrin on the protective intranasal influenza vaccination,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 11, article 00360, 2020
22
Kulkarni T. A., Bade A. N., Sillman B., Shetty B. L. D., Wojtkiewicz M. S., Gautam N., Hilaire J. R., Sravanam S., Szlachetka A., Lamberty B. G., Morsey B. M., Fox H. S., Alnouti Y., McMillan J. M., Mosley R. L., Meza J., Domanico P. L., Yue T. Y., Moore G., Edagwa B. J., and Gendelman H. E., “A year-long extended release nanoformulated cabotegravir prodrug,” Nature Materials, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 910–920, 2020
23
Chen T. K., Liu W., Xiong S., Li D. L., Fang S. H., Wu Z. F., Wang Q., and Chen X. J., “Nanoparticles mediating the sustained puerarin release facilitate improved brain delivery to treat Parkinson's disease,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 48, pp. 45276–45289, 2019
24
Guo H., Li F., Qiu H., Xu W., and Chen X. J. R., “Synergistically enhanced mucoadhesive and penetrable polypeptide nanogel for efficient drug delivery to orthotopic bladder cancer,” Research, vol. 2020, article 8970135, 2020
25
Xiao Y., Chen J., Wang C., Ding J., and Tao W., “Editorial: Emerging micro- and nanotechnologies for medical and pharmacological applications,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 12, article 648749, 2021
26
Oshi M. A., Lee J., Naeem M., Hasan N., Kim J., Kim H. J., Lee E. H., Jung Y., and Yoo J. W., “Curcumin nanocrystal/pH-responsive polyelectrolyte multilayer core-shell nanoparticles for inflammation-targeted alleviation of ulcerative colitis,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 3571–3581, 2020
27
Domenech T., and Doyle P. S., “High loading capacity nanoencapsulation and release of hydrophobic drug nanocrystals from microgel particles,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 498–509, 2020
28
Gautam N., McMillan J. M., Kumar D., Bade A. N., Pan Q., Kulkarni T. A., Li W., Sillman B., Smith N. A., Shetty B. L. D., Szlachetka A., Edagwa B. J., Gendelman H. E., and Alnouti Y., “Lipophilic nanocrystal prodrug-release defines the extended pharmacokinetic profiles of a year-long cabotegravir,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 3453–3453, 2021
29
Godfrin P. D., Lee H., Lee J. H., and Doyle P. S., “Photopolymerized micelle-laden hydrogels can simultaneously form and encapsulate nanocrystals to improve drug substance solubility and expedite drug product design,” Small, vol. 15, no. 6, article 1803372, 2019
30
Zhou J., Li J., du X., and Xu B., “Supramolecular biofunctional materials,” Biomaterials, vol. 129, pp. 1–27, 2017
31
He H. J., Lin X. Y., Guo J. Q., Wang J. Q., and Xu B., “Perimitochondrial enzymatic self-assembly for selective targeting the mitochondria of cancer cells,” ACS Nano, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 6947–6955, 2020
32
Wang W., Tan B. Y., Chen J. R., Bao R., Zhang X. R., Liang S., Shang Y. Y., Liang W., Cui Y. L., Fan G. W., Jia H. Z., and Liu W. G., “An injectable conductive hydrogel encapsulating plasmid DNA-eNOs and ADSCs for treating myocardial infarction,” Biomaterials, vol. 160, pp. 69–81, 2018
33
Lin X. Y., Xu B. R., Zhu H., Liu J. R., Solovev A., and Mei Y. F., “Requirement and development of hydrogel micromotors towards biomedical applications,” Research, vol. 2020, article 7659749, 2020
34
Madry H., Gao L., Rey-Rico A., Venkatesan J. K., Müller-Brandt K., Cai X. Y., Goebel L., Schmitt G., Speicher-Mentges S., Zurakowski D., Menger M. D., Laschke M. W., and Cucchiarini M., “Thermosensitive hydrogel based on PEO-PPO-PEO poloxamers for a controlled in situ release of recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors for effective gene therapy of cartilage defects,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 2, article 1906508, 2020
35
Kawaguchi H., “Functional polymer microspheres,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1171–1210, 2000
36
Song X., Zhang Z. X., Zhu J. L., Wen Y. T., Zhao F., Lei L. J., Phan-Thien N., Khoo B. C., and Li J., “Thermoresponsive hydrogel induced by dual supramolecular assemblies and its controlled release property for enhanced anticancer drug delivery,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1516–1527, 2020
37
Ge S. J., Li J. J., Geng J., Liu S. N., Xu H., and Gu Z. Z., “Adjustable dual temperature-sensitive hydrogel based on a self-assembly cross-linking strategy with highly stretchable and healable properties,” Materials Horizons, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1189–1198, 2021
38
McInnes S. J. P., Szili E. J., al-Bataineh S. A., Vasani R. B., Xu J. J., Alf M. E., Gleason K. K., Short R. D., and Voelcker N. H., “Fabrication and characterization of a porous silicon drug delivery system with an initiated chemical vapor deposition temperature-responsive coating,” Langmuir, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 301–308, 2016
39
Singh N., and Lyon L. A., “Au nanoparticle templated synthesis of pNIPAm nanogels,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 719–726, 2007
40
Akiyoshi K., Kang E. C., Kurumada S., Sunamoto J., Principi T., and Winnik F. M., “Controlled association of amphiphilic polymers in water: thermosensitive nanoparticles formed by self-assembly of hydrophobically modified pullulans and poly(N-isopropylacrylamides),” Macromolecules, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 3244–3249, 2000
41
Gong X. B., Hou C. Y., Zhang Q. H., Li Y. G., and Wang H. Z., “Thermochromic hydrogel-functionalized textiles for synchronous visual monitoring of On-DemandIn VitroDrug release,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 12, no. 46, pp. 51225–51235, 2020
42
Liarou E., Varlas S., Skoulas D., Tsimblouli C., Sereti E., Dimas K., and Iatrou H., “Smart polymersomes and hydrogels from polypeptide-based polymer systems through alpha-amino acid N-carboxyanhydride ring-opening polymerization,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 83, pp. 28–78, 2018
43
Xiong S., Luo J. S., Wang Q., Li Z. J., Li J. T., Liu Q., Gao L. Q., Fang S. H., Li Y. Y., Pan H. F., Wang H., Zhang Y. B., Wang Q., Chen X. J., and Chen T. K., “Targeted graphene oxide for drug delivery as a therapeutic nanoplatform against Parkinson's disease,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1705–1715, 2021
44
Tan Y., Wang D., Xu H., Yang Y., An W., Yu L., Xiao Z., and Xu S., “A fast, reversible, and robust gradient nanocomposite hydrogel actuator with water-promoted thermal response,” Macromolecular Rapid Communications, vol. 39, no. 8, 2018
45
Chen H. H., Chang P. C., Wey S. P., Chen P. M., Chen C., and Chan M. H., “Therapeutic effects of honokiol on motor impairment in hemiparkinsonian mice are associated with reversing neurodegeneration and targeting PPARγ regulation,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 108, pp. 254–262, 2018
46
Weng C. C., Chen Z. A., Chao K. T., Ee T. W., Lin K. J., Chan M. H., Hsiao I. T., Yen T. C., Kung M. P., Hsu C. H., and Wey S. P., “Quantitative analysis of the therapeutic effect of magnolol on MPTP-induced mouse model of Parkinson's disease using in vivo 18F-9-fluoropropyl-(+)-dihydrotetrabenazine PET imaging,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 3, article 0173503, 2017
47
Tan Y., Wang D., Xu H., Yang Y., Wang X.-L., Tian F., Xu P., An W., Zhao X., and Xu S., “Rapid recovery hydrogel actuators in air with bionic large-ranged gradient structure,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 46, pp. 40125–40131, 2018
48
Liu J., Chen G., Guo M., and Jiang M., “Dual stimuli-responsive supramolecular hydrogel based on hybrid inclusion complex (HIC),” Macromolecules, vol. 43, no. 19, pp. 8086–8093, 2010
49
Zhang J. G., Yang H., Abali B. E., Li M. J., Xia Y., and Haag R., “Dynamic mechanics-modulated hydrogels to regulate the differentiation of stem-cell spheroids in soft microniches and modeling of the nonlinear behavior,” Small, vol. 15, no. 30, article 1901920, 2019
50
Chakraborty P., Tang Y. M., Yamamoto T., Yao Y. F., Guterman T., Zilberzwige-Tal S., Adadi N., Ji W., Dvir T., Ramamoorthy A., Wei G. H., and Gazit E., “Unusual two-step assembly of a minimalistic dipeptide-based functional hypergelator,” Advanced Materials, vol. 32, no. 9, article 1906043, 2020
51
Wu Y. H., Wang H. B., Gao F., Xu Z. Y., Dai F. Y., and Liu W. G., “An injectable supramolecular polymer nanocomposite hydrogel for prevention of breast cancer recurrence with theranostic and mammoplastic functions,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 28, no. 21, p. 1801000, 2018
52
Zheng J., Fan R., Wu H., Yao H., Yan Y., Liu J., Ran L., Sun Z., Yi L., Dang L., Gan P., Zheng P., Yang T., Zhang Y., Tang T., and Wang Y., “Directed self-assembly of herbal small molecules into sustained release hydrogels for treating neural inflammation,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 1640, 2020
53
Mealy J. E., Chung J. J., Jeong H. H., Issadore D., Lee D., Atluri P., and Burdick J. A., “Injectable granular hydrogels with multifunctional properties for biomedical applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 30, no. 20, article 1705912, 2018
54
Wang H., Wu Y., Cui C., Yang J., and Liu W., “Antifouling super water absorbent supramolecular polymer hydrogel as an artificial vitreous body,” Advancement of Science, vol. 5, no. 11, article 1800711, 2018
55
Loebel C., Rodell C. B., Chen M. H., and Burdick J. A., “Shear-thinning and self-healing hydrogels as injectable therapeutics and for 3D-printing,” Nature Protocols, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1521–1541, 2017
56
di Stefano, Marinelli L., Eusepi P., Ciulla M., Fulle S., Di Filippo E. S., Magliulo L., di Biase, and Cacciatore I., “Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel selenyl and sulfur-l-dopa derivatives as potential anti-Parkinson's disease agents,” Biomolecules, vol. 9, no. 6, p. 239, 2019
57
Rosenblad C., Li Q., Pioli E. Y., Dovero S., Antunes A., Agúndez L., Bardelli M., Linden R. M., Henckaerts E., Björklund A., Bezard E., and Björklund T., “Vector-mediated L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine delivery reverses motor impairments in a primate model of Parkinson's disease,” Brain, vol. 142, no. 8, pp. 2402–2416, 2019
Year 2021 volume 2021 Issue 11
PDF
98
53
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/2021/9812523
  • Receive Date:2021-07-19
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2021-11-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2021-07-19
  • Accepted:2021-10-18
Funding
Key Project of Basic Research of Shenzhen(JCYJ20200109113603854)
Macau SAR(0098/2020/A)
Research Fund of University of Macau(MYRG2018-00207-ICMS; MYRG2019-00121-ICMS)
Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation(2019B1515120043)
Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department(2019TP1001)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(21972169; 21773311)
Affiliations
    1Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Micro & Nano Materials Interface Science, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
    2Science and Technology Innovation Center, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
    3State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China
    4Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Mold, Ministry of Education, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450002, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/2021/9812523
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT