Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Kilometers Long Graphene-Coated Optical Fibers for Fast Thermal Sensing
收藏切换
PDF
Yiyong Guo1, Bing Han1, 2, Junting Du1, Shanshan Cao3, Hua Gao4, Ning An1, Yiwei Li1, 2, Shujie An1, 5, Zengling Ran1, 5, Yue Lin6, Wencai Ren7, Yunjiang Rao1, 2, Baicheng Yao1
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 5612850
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2021 Article ID 5612850
• Research Article •
Kilometers Long Graphene-Coated Optical Fibers for Fast Thermal Sensing
Full
Yiyong Guo1, Bing Han1, 2, Junting Du1, Shanshan Cao3, Hua Gao4, Ning An1, Yiwei Li1, 2, Shujie An1, 5, Zengling Ran1, 5, Yue Lin6, Wencai Ren7, Yunjiang Rao1, 2, Baicheng Yao1
Affiliations
  • 1Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications (Education Ministry of China), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
  • 2Research Centre of Optical Fiber Sensing, Zhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou 310000 China
  • 3Optical Fiber Co., Ltd., ZTT Group, Nantong 226009 China
  • 4Carbonene Technology Co., Ltd, Deyang 618000 China
  • 5Optical Science and Technology Ltd., China National Petroleum Corporation, Chengdu 610041, China
  • 6Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK
  • 7Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

B.Y. and Y.R. led this work. Y.G., B.H., J.D., and N.A. built the setup and measured the fibers and sensing systems. H.G. and W.R. led the fabrication and optimization of the graphene material. S.C. B.H., Y.G., and D.J. led the fabrication of the graphene-coated fibers. B.Y., Y.L., B.H., and C.Q. finished the theoretical analysis. All the authors discussed and analyzed the results. B.Y., B.H., Y.G., Y.L., W.R., and Y.R. prepared the manuscript. Yiyong Guo, Bing Han, and Junting Du contributed equally to this work.

Published: 2021-03-20 doi: 10.34133/2021/5612850
Outline
收藏切换

The combination of optical fiber with graphene has greatly expanded the application regimes of fiber optics, from dynamic optical control and ultrafast pulse generation to high precision sensing. However, limited by fabrication, previous graphene-fiber samples are typically limited in the micrometer to centimeter scale, which cannot take the inherent advantage of optical fibers—long-distance optical transmission. Here, we demonstrate kilometers long graphene-coated optical fiber (GCF) based on industrial graphene nanosheets and coating technique. The GCF shows unusually high thermal diffusivity of 24.99 mm2 s-1 in the axial direction, measured by a thermal imager directly. This enables rapid thermooptical response both in optical fiber Bragg grating sensors at one point (18-fold faster than conventional fiber) and in long-distance distributed fiber sensing systems based on backward Rayleigh scattering in optical fiber (15-fold faster than conventional fiber). This work realizes the industrial-level graphene-fiber production and provides a novel platform for two-dimensional material-based optical fiber sensing applications.

Yiyong Guo, Bing Han, Junting Du, Shanshan Cao, Hua Gao, Ning An, Yiwei Li, Shujie An, Zengling Ran, Yue Lin, Wencai Ren, Yunjiang Rao, Baicheng Yao. Kilometers Long Graphene-Coated Optical Fibers for Fast Thermal Sensing[J]. Research, 2021 , 2021 (3) : 5612850 - . DOI: 10.34133/2021/5612850
Full Text
Less
1. Introduction
Less
Winning the Nobel Prize in physics of 2009, optical fibers have been a cornerstone of global information networks [1]. Besides applications in telecommunication, optical fiber-based sensing technology possesses the unique capability to measure the spatial and temporal map of environmental quantities such as temperature, strain, pressure, and electromagnetic fluctuations remotely [2, 3], owing to the kilometers long light transmission. In recent years, distributed fiber optic sensors have spurred wide advances worth billions of dollars, ranging from geophysical exploration and remote security to smart city [4–6]. For meeting the continuously increasing requirement of sensing performance, the combination of advanced materials and optical fibers becomes a significant route.
Graphene with exceptional electric, photonic, mechanic, and thermal properties [7–14] is a broadly attractive material for fiber functionalization [15]. The incorporation of graphene and optical fibers has brought breakthroughs across lasers [16–19] and modulators [20–22] to sensors [23–26]. However, previous graphene-fiber implementations were limited to micrometer-sized samples, until meters long graphene-fiber hybrid production in 2019 [27]. Nevertheless, it is still far from kilometers long graphene fiber for systematic sensing out-of-lab.
Here, we demonstrate a way to produce kilometers long graphene-coated optical fiber (GCF) by spraying graphene nanosheets [28] on optical fiber in the industrial fabrication process. By spraying and molding graphene-acrylate hybrid (30%-wt) on the optical fibers, we produce a graphene coating layer on-fiber with high quality, verified by Raman spectroscopy and electrical measurement. This GCF demonstrates excellent thermal diffusivity α≈24.99 mm2 s-1, which is 30-fold larger than conventional silica fibers (α≈0.83 mm2 s-1). As a result, we experimentally reveal that it shows a unique advantage for fast optical temperature measurements, accelerating the thermooptical response over 18-folds in fiber Bragg grating sensors and over 15-folds in long-distance distributed fiber sensing systems.
2. Results
Less
Figure 1(a) demonstrates the concept and structure of our long-distance GCF. Conventionally, optical fiber is composed of silica core, silica cladding, and polymer coating, from inside to outside. Thus, the thermal diffusivity of fiber is intrinsically low [29]. Graphene with exotically high thermal conductivity (>2000 Wm-1 K-1) [30–32] may help to improve the thermal diffusivity of fiber, but to integrate graphene in silica core or cladding will induce considerably high optical loss (several dB per centimeter [27]), and the fabrication meets technical challenges. Thus, we replace the external polymer coating with graphene nanosheets, which can also dramatically enhance heat transfer in the axial direction, via industrially implementable preparation (Figure 1(b)): Kilometers long optical fiber is drawn from silica preform in a drawing tower, with drawing speed 10 m/s; then, the prepared graphene-acrylate hybrid is sprayed directly on the surface of fiber, forming the graphene coating. In the coating material, the content of graphene is 30% in weight. Such optimized graphene content offers enough lubrication, avoids nozzle clogging in production, and ensures good flexibility and strength after solidification. We provide more details about material preparation in Section S1. The coating speed is comparable to the fiber drawing; thus, we can produce 30 km long GCF in 1 hour. Besides, considering that graphene would absorb ultraviolet light, we use high ultraviolet power (3 kW) in the curing process. Thanks to the industrial coating scheme based on jet spray, the cost of the GCF is only 10 dollars per km (2.5 dollars for graphene material and 7.5 dollars for fiber fab). In this figure, we show the picture of 6 km long GCF. Thanks to the industrial scheme, production of the GCF can be easily scaled up to thousand kilometers.
By using optical and scanning electron microscopy, we image the GCF in Figure 1(c). It is clearly observed that the GCF is black in color, due to the graphene coating. The fast coating process also enables the surface of the GCF uniform, and the thickness of the graphene coating layer is ≈20  μm. Here, we also illustrate the sectional view of the GCF and zoom the graphene coating region in. The graphene nanosheets with size of 10~30  μm link and stack with each other randomly. In the cross-sectional SEM picture, the small fragments are induced by the fiber cutting. The dark fragments on the surface are graphene nanosheets, while the bright fragments are silica. The left panel of Figure 1(d) plots the Raman spectra of the graphene on the GCF, measured by using a 514 nm laser, at different spatial locations, from 0 km to 5 km. The position of the G peak is 1576 cm-1 on average, with deviation <±1 cm-1 and full width at half maximum <30 cm-1. The position of 2D peak is 2706.4 cm-1 in average, with deviation <±2 cm-1 and half-linewidth <70 cm-1. Characterization of the G and 2D peaks verifies that the graphene in the coating is in a form of graphene nanoplatelets [33]. Besides, a relatively strong D peak at 1350 cm-1 and a relatively high D+D′ peak at 2930 cm-1 also indicates that there is the presence of boundaries and defects due to its fragmented nature [34]. Such Raman spectroscopic analysis also suggests that the quality of the graphene keeps well along the long fiber. To further demonstrate the uniformity, we also show the scanning electronic microscopic images at these locations. It verifies that the thickness and carbonation of the coating are uniform.
To investigate the thermal conduction enhancement, we heat a point on the GCF and on a section of silica fiber simultaneously in a vacuum, and we detect the thermal response by using a thermal imager. Figure 2(a) maps the images measured at different time delays; here, both the GCF and the silica fiber are fixed in an insulation chamber with controlled macroscopic temperature 24°C, while the heater probe in 0.1 mm size offers stable temperature 25°C (yellow arrow). The comparisons clearly show that the spread of the temperature field along the GCF is faster than the commercial silica fiber: when time delay is 0.1 s, the bright region of GCF (silica fiber) is ≈1.5 mm (≈0.3 mm), and when time delay is 1 s, the bright region of GCF (silica fiber) is >10 mm (≈2 mm). In more detail, we record the temperature dynamics at the point 6 mm away from the heater (blue arrow); Figure 2(b) plots the measured traces. In the measurement, the power of the heater is constant (2 W) for each case, providing constant temperatures. When temperature increases by 1°C, 2°C, and 3°C for transfer distance L=6 mm, the time required for half of the maximum temperature rise t1/2 of GCF is 0.2 s, while t1/2 of a silica fiber is 6 s. Referring to the temperature distribution model [35, 36], the thermal diffusivity α=1.38 L2/πt1/2, we estimate the diffusivity of the GCF in axial direction αGCF=24.99±1.2 mm2/s, 30-fold higher than the silica fiber without polymer coating (αsilica fiber=0.83 mm2/s). In measurements, systematic error is ±0.01 s and ±10 mK; this thermal diffusivity of the graphene nanosheet composite also meets the predictions in previous studies [37, 38]. Considering the relationship of thermal diffusivity α and thermal conductivity K=αρCp, we estimate the thermal conductivity of the GCF KGCF≈26.3 Wm-1 K-1 in the axial direction, about 19-fold higher than the silica fiber (1.4 Wm-1 K-1 [39]); here, ρ=1.5 g/cm3 is the density of the graphene coating, and Cp,graphene=0.7 Jg-1 K-1 is the thermal capacity of the graphene coating (Cp,silica=0.68 Jg-1 K-1 [30]). Such rapid response enables the GCF to percept minor temperature fluctuations in dynamics; we show several examples in Figure 2(c), by adding thermal signals in sinusoidal (1 Hz repetition, 25.1°C to 25.5°C), triangle (1/6 Hz repetition, 24.48°C to 24.62°C), and square (1/10 Hz repetition, 23.8°C to 24.4°C) waveform. The detected temperature at 20 mm away can well follow the real temperature alterations.
In fiber sensing applications, the thermooptical response relies on not only the time delay in the axial direction but also the radial direction, from the fiber surface to the core. We simulate the thermal field diffusions in Section S2. For calibrating the practical thermooptical response, we write Bragg gratings in the fiber core of the GCF and use the GCF-based fiber Bragg grating (FBG) in temperature sensing (Figure 3(a)). In this measurement, the temporal sampling rate is >100 Hz, which traces the thermooptical in high resolution. When temperature changes the refractive index n or the grating period Λ in fiber, the reflected interference peak of a FBG shifts, meeting the relation λ=2nΛ; here, λ is the Bragg wavelength [40]. In room temperature (24°C), Λ=531.6 nm, n=1.46, λ=1552.34 nm. Then, we heat a point on the GCF, and the thermal transfer distance in the axial direction is 8 mm. Figure 3(b) plots the reflection spectra of the graphene-coated FBG (upper panel) and a typical silica FBG (bottom panel). When heating the fibers from 24°C to 104°C and waiting until stable, the reflected peak of both the graphene-coated FBG and the silica FBG redshifts, from 1552.34 nm to 1553.34 nm. The two types of fiber share the same temperature sensitivity, 12.5 pm/K linearly, because their material and geometry in the fiber core are the same.
As aforementioned, the thermal transfer efficiency of the GCF and the silica fiber is distinguished. We compare the temporal responses of them in Figure 3(c), by using a frequency counter with a sampling rate 1 kHz. When heating the samples from 24°C to 104°C immediately, stable-to-stable response delay of the GCF-based FBG is 4 s for ΔT=80°C, and t1/2=0.6 s. This suggests that the optically tested thermal diffusivity of the GCF is 14.81 mm2/s, which is over 18-fold higher than the silica fiber (stable-to-stable delay 40 s, t1/2=10 s, optically measured thermal diffusivity 0.81 mm2/s). Moreover, we measure the time delay when the temperature decreases back. From 104°C to 24°C, the GCF spends 5 s, while the silica fiber needs 36 s. Such a fast response is statically verified in repeated measurements, the uncertainty of the delay when temperature tunes up and down on the GCF is less than ±0.2 s. We also note that the thermooptical response speed of the GCF increases with environmental temperature. Figure 3(d) illustrates the measured result: when the environmental temperature ranges from 24°C to 80°C, for the same additional increment +20°C, the optically measured delay t1/2 decreases from ≈0.6 s to ≈0.3 s (the upper panel). Correspondingly, the optical sensed thermal diffusivity increases from ≈14.81 mm2/s to ≈29.61 mm2/s.
Finally, we use the GCF in both distributed temperature sensing and test its performance. To better measure the fast response of a system, we use a commercial phase-sensitive optical time domain reflectometry (φ-OTDR) system. Compared to the distributed temperature systems based on anti-Stokes backward scattering [41], this instrument does not need signal integration temporally, thus enabling a large data sampling rate (25 Hz), which is fast enough to capture the thermal dynamics in fiber. We also discuss the results of different distributed fiber sensing systems in Section S3. Figure 4(a) illustrates the experimental setup. A commercial φ-OTDR instrument (Optical Science and Technology Ltd., uDAS) is employed to compare the performances of the GCF with the silica fiber under the same condition (core/cladding diameter 9/125  μm). The two fiber sections are spliced in a 5 km long fiber system, at the location of 3 km away from the instrument. In order to separate the responses of the GCF and the silica fiber, an additional 1 km long silica fiber is used to link the two sections. In the measurement, we adopt a 1 m spatial resolution to minimize the pulse uncertainty and use a 12.5 Hz sampling rate for obtaining enough signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In the sensing process, the φ-OTDR detects the phase difference change of the reflected Rayleigh backscattering in fiber, which relies on the temperature alteration.
We first heat the GCF and the silica fiber simultaneously from 20°C to 50°C. A moment later, we cool their temperature from 50°C down to 20°C back. We map the thermooptical response in Figure 4(b). In the heating process, the detected phase difference change dφ/dt>0; oppositely in the cooling process, the detected phase difference change dφ/dt<0. When the temperature is stable, dφ/dt=0. Hence, we can conveniently obtain the response delay from one thermal state to another thermal state. It is obvious that the GCF section responds much faster than the silica fiber section. Figure 4(c) shows their temporal traces more in detail. Once putting the heater on fiber, we observe a sharp oscillation immediately. This is a mechanical fluctuation signal induced by the fiber heater. Its temporal duration is <0.02 s. Meanwhile, the fibers begin to feel the heat. In the GCF section, benefiting from its fast thermal conduction, the temperature of the whole section changes rapidly from 20°C to 50°C (stable to stable); the optical measured delay of the GCF section is ≈0.8 s. In comparison, the silica fiber responds slowly (temporal delay≈12 s). Such fast thermal response of the GCF is repeatedly measured as shown in Figure 4(d). We also note that the graphene on-fiber coating does not deteriorate the sensitivity, because the graphene does not influence the light propagating in the fiber core. By periodically heating and cooling the GCF, we plot its phase difference response in Figure 4(c). In this measurement, data error is <5%. Figure 4(e) summarizes the fast sensing performance. For the fast distributed sensing system for temperature tracing, the graphene-coated fiber can respond 15 times faster than the silica fiber. We also note that the spatial resolution of the sensing system is determined by the signal modulation; hence, using the GCF would not improve its positioning accuracy. Besides the φ-OTDR, we also demonstrate that our GCF responds faster than silica fiber in the distributed temperature sensing (DTS) system based on Raman backscattering (see extended data in Section S3).
3. Discussion
Less
In a nutshell, we report the kilometers long GCF, which could be mass-produced, via coating graphene nanosheets on the surface of silica fibers industrially. Such GCF demonstrates fast thermal response, with thermal diffusivity≈24.99 mm2/s in the axial direction, 30-fold higher than conventional silica fiber. Leveraging this new fiber can enable detecting acceleration over 18-fold improvement for the FBG temperature sensor at one point, or 15-fold improvement for long-distance distributed fiber sensing system. Such fast response also demonstrates high reliability and robustness in repeated measurements. This work builds a bridge for the industrial combination of graphene and fiber optics, which offers not only inspiration for the combination of other 2D materials and optical structures but also a novel platform for high-performance optic-fiber temperature sensing, which may bring unpredicted evolution for applications such as deep-earth/deep-sea exploration, remote safety monitoring, and fire warning.
4. Materials and Methods
Less
4.1. Fabrication and Characterization of the GCF
First, we mixed and stirred the graphene dispersion and the acrylate (graphene 30 wt%). This hybrid is sprayable by using an industrial fiber coater, under 120 kPa pressure. Optical fibers were fabricated directly in the drawing tower. Then, we controlled the spraying speed to ensure the coating thickness 20  μm. After surface coating, the graphene-acrylate film was exposed to UV light for full solidification. This implementation replaced the conventional polymer coating of a fiber to graphene-based material. We characterized the quality of the graphene coating by using microscopy, electric method, and Raman spectroscopy. The graphene nanosheets on-fiber are distributed tightly, enabling a typical electrical resistance 6 kΩ/mm.
4.2. Experimental Measurements
(1) Direct measurement of thermal diffusivity of the GCF: A temperature-controlled probe (TEC) was applied to heat a point on the fiber. The heated short fiber sections were pictured by using a lens calibrated thermoimager (Flir 655c), with temperature resolution 0.1 K, and spatial resolution 0.1 mm. (2) Optical measurement by using FBGs: We prepared FBG by using UV writing technique, and then, we coated the graphene-acrylate on the FBG. The FBG was measured by using an optoelectronic demodulator (FAZ Technology I4G), with a sampling rate 1 kHz and frequency resolution 0.1 pm. (3) Measurement based on the φ-OTDR: The temperature distribution along the GCF/silica fiber was measured through employing a φ-OTDR (Optical Science and Technology Ltd., uDAS), with spatial resolution 1 m and maximum sampling rate 250 Hz.
Funding
Less
  • UESTC-ZTT joint laboratory project(H04W180463)
  • 111 project(B14039)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(61975025; 61705032)
References
Less
1
Kao C. K., “Nobel lecture: sand from centuries past: send future voices fast,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 2299–2303, 2010
2
Soto M. A., Ramírez J. A., and Thévenaz L., “Intensifying the response of distributed optical fibre sensors using 2D and 3D image restoration,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, pp. 1–11, 2016
3
Zadok A., Antman Y., Primerov N., Denisov A., Sancho J., and Thevenaz L., “Random-access distributed fiber sensing,” Laser & Photonics Reviews, vol. 6, pp. 1–5, 2012
4
Lindsey N. J., Craig Dawe T., and Ajo-Franklin J. B., “Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing,” Science, vol. 366, pp. 1103–1107, 2019
5
Yamate T., Fujisawa G., and Ikegami T., “Optical sensors for the exploration of oil and gas,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 35, no. 16, pp. 3538–3545, 2017
6
Wang Z., Zhang B., Xiong J., Fu Y., Lin S., Jiang J., Chen Y., Wu Y., Meng Q., and Rao Y., “Distributed acoustic sensing based on pulse-coding phase-sensitive OTDR,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 6117–6124, 2019
7
Castro Neto A. H., Guinea F., Peres N. M. R., Novoselov K. S., and Geim A. K., “The electronic properties of graphene,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 109–162, 2009
8
Avouris P., “Graphene: electronic and photonic properties and devices,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 4285–4294, 2010
9
Yao B., Liu Y., Huang S. W., Choi C., Xie Z., Flores J. F., Wu Y., Yu M., Kwong D. L., Huang Y., Rao Y., Duan X., and Wong C. W., “Broadband gate-tunable terahertz plasmons in graphene heterostructures,” Nature Photonics, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2018
10
Yao B., Huang S. W., Liu Y., Vinod A. K., Choi C., Hoff M., Li Y., Yu M., Feng Z., Kwong D. L., Huang Y., Rao Y., Duan X., and Wong C. W., “Gate-tunable frequency combs in graphene-nitride microresonators,” Nature, vol. 558, no. 7710, pp. 410–414, 2018
11
Zandiatashbar A., Lee G. H., An S. J., Lee S., Mathew N., Terrones M., Hayashi T., Picu C. R., Hone J., and Koratkar N., “Effect of defects on the intrinsic strength and stiffness of graphene,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, pp. 1–9, 2014
12
Ghosh S., Calizo I., Teweldebrhan D., Pokatilov E. P., Nika D. L., Balandin A. A., Bao W., Miao F., and Lau C. N., “Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, pp. 2008–2011, 2008
13
Xin G., Yao T., Sun H., Scott S. M., Shao D., Wang G., and Lian J., “Highly thermally conductive and mechanically strong graphene fibers,” Science, vol. 349, pp. 1083–1087, 2015
14
Pop E., Varshney V., and Roy A. K., “Thermal properties of graphene: Fundamentals and applications,” MRS Bulletin, vol. 37, pp. 1273–1281, 2012
15
Tan T., Jiang X., Wang C., Yao B., and Zhang H., “2D material optoelectronics for information functional device applications: status and challenges,” Advancement of Science, vol. 7, p. 2000058, 2020
16
Qin C., Jia K., Li Q., Tan T., Wang X., Guo Y., Huang S.-W., Liu Y., Zhu S., Xie Z., Rao Y., and Yao B., “Electrically controllable laser frequency combs in graphene-fibre microresonators,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 185, 2020
17
Martinez A., and Sun Z., “Nanotube and graphene saturable absorbers for fibre lasers,” Nature Photonics, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 842–845, 2013
18
Bao Q., Zhang H., Wang Y., Ni Z., Yan Y., Shen Z. X., Loh K. P., and Tang D. Y., “Atomic-layer graphene as a saturable absorber for ultrafast pulsed lasers,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 19, no. 19, pp. 3077–3083, 2009
19
Sun Z., Hasan T., Torrisi F., Popa D., Privitera G., Wang F., Bonaccorso F., Basko D. M., and Ferrari A. C., “Graphene mode-locked ultrafast laser,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 803–810, 2010
20
Sun Z., Martinez A., and Wang F., “Optical modulators with 2D layered materials,” Nature Photonics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 227–238, 2016
21
Li W., Chen B., Meng C., Fang W., Xiao Y., Li X., Hu Z., Xu Y., Tong L., Wang H., Liu W., Bao J., and Shen Y. R., “Ultrafast all-optical graphene modulator,” Nano Letters, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 955–959, 2014
22
Chen J.-H., Zheng B.-C., Shao G.-H., Ge S.-J., Xu F., and Lu Y.-Q., “An all-optical modulator based on a stereo graphene-microfiber structure,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. e360–e360, 2015
23
Cheng Y., Wang R., Sun J., and Gao L., “A stretchable and highly sensitive graphene-based fiber for sensing tensile strain, bending, and torsion,” Advanced Materials, vol. 27, no. 45, pp. 7365–7371, 2015
24
Cao Z., Yao B., Qin C., Yang R., Guo Y., Zhang Y., Wu Y., Bi L., Chen Y., Xie Z., Peng G., Huang S. W., Wong C. W., and Rao Y., “Biochemical sensing in graphene-enhanced microfiber resonators with individual molecule sensitivity and selectivity,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 8, pp. 1–10, 2019
25
Yao B., Yu C., Wu Y., Huang S. W., Wu H., Gong Y., Chen Y., Li Y., Wong C. W., Fan X., and Rao Y., “Graphene-enhanced brillouin optomechanical microresonator for ultrasensitive gas detection,” Nano Letters, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 4996–5002, 2017
26
An N., Tan T., Peng Z., Qin C., Yuan Z., Bi L., Liao C., Wang Y., Rao Y., Soavi G., and Yao B., “Electrically tunable four-wave-mixing in graphene heterogeneous fiber for individual gas molecule detection,” Nano Letters, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 6473–6480, 2020
27
Chen K., Zhou X., Cheng X., Qiao R., Cheng Y., Liu C., Xie Y., Yu W., Yao F., Sun Z., Wang F., Liu K., and Liu Z., “Graphene photonic crystal fibre with strong and tunable light-matter interaction,” Nature Photonics, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 754–759, 2019
28
Ren W., and Cheng H. M., “The global growth of graphene,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 726–730, 2014
29
Chardon D., and Huard S. J., “Thermal diffusivity of optical fibers measured by photoacoustics,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 341–342, 1982
30
Balandin A. A., “Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials,” Nature Materials, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 569–581, 2011
31
Chen S., Wu Q., Mishra C., Kang J., Zhang H., Cho K., Cai W., Balandin A. A., and Ruoff R. S., “Thermal conductivity of isotopically modified graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 203–207, 2012
32
Xu X., Pereira L. F. C., Wang Y., Wu J., Zhang K., Zhao X., Bae S., Tinh Bui C., Xie R., Thong J. T. L., Hong B. H., Loh K. P., Donadio D., Li B., and Özyilmaz B., “Length-dependent thermal conductivity in suspended single-layer graphene,” Nature Communications, vol. 5, pp. 1–6, 2014
33
Bin Wu J., Lin M. L., Cong X., Liu H. N., and Tan P. H., “Raman spectroscopy of graphene-based materials and its applications in related devices,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 1822–1873, 2018
34
Ferrari A. C., “Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: disorder, electron-phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects,” Solid State Communications, vol. 143, no. 1-2, pp. 47–57, 2007
35
Capacity H., “Flash method of determining thermal diffusivity,” Encyclopedia of Thermal Stresses, pp. 1683–1683, 2014
36
Borup K. A., De Boor J., Wang H., Drymiotis F., Gascoin F., Shi X., Chen L., Fedorov M. I., Müller E., Iversen B. B., and Snyder G. J., “Measuring thermoelectric transport properties of materials,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 423–435, 2015
37
Gresil M., Wang Z., Poutrel Q. A., and Soutis C., “Thermal diffusivity mapping of graphene based polymer nanocomposites,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, pp. 1–10, 2017
38
Potenza M., Cataldo A., Bovesecchi G., Corasaniti S., Coppa P., and Bellucci S., “Graphene nanoplatelets: thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity by the flash method,” AIP Advances, vol. 7, no. 7, article 075214, 2017
39
Lide D. R., and Haynes W. M. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, CRC Press, 1995
40
Wu Y., Yao B., Zhang A., Rao Y., Wang Z., Cheng Y., Gong Y., Zhang W., Chen Y., and Chiang K. S., “Graphene-coated microfiber Bragg grating for high-sensitivity gas sensing,” Optics Letters, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1235–1237, 2014
41
Dakin J. P., Pratt D. J., Bibby G. W., and Ross J. N., “Distributed optical fibre Raman temperature sensor using a semiconductor light source and detector,” Electronics Letters, vol. 21, no. 13, p. 569, 1985
42
Meric I., Han M. Y., Young A. F., Ozyilmaz B., Kim P., and Shepard K. L., “Current saturation in zero-bandgap, top-gated graphene field-effect transistors,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 654–659, 2008
43
Schwierz F., “Graphene transistors,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 487–496, 2010
44
Masoudi A., Belal M., and Newson T. P., “A distributed optical fibre dynamic strain sensor based on phase-OTDR,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 8, article 085204, 2013
45
Sutherland R., Townend J., Toy V., Upton P., Coussens J., Allen M., Baratin L. M., Barth N., Becroft L., Boese C., Boles A., Boulton C., Broderick N. G. R., Janku-Capova L., Carpenter B. M., Célérier B., Chamberlain C., Cooper A., Coutts A., Cox S., Craw L., Doan M. L., Eccles J., Faulkner D., Grieve J., Grochowski J., Gulley A., Hartog A., Howarth J., Jacobs K., Jeppson T., Kato N., Keys S., Kirilova M., Kometani Y., Langridge R., Lin W., Little T., Lukacs A., Mallyon D., Mariani E., Massiot C., Mathewson L., Melosh B., Menzies C., Moore J., Morales L., Morgan C., Mori H., Niemeijer A., Nishikawa O., Prior D., Sauer K., Savage M., Schleicher A., Schmitt D. R., Shigematsu N., Taylor-Offord S., Teagle D., Tobin H., Valdez R., Weaver K., Wiersberg T., Williams J., Woodman N., and Zimmer M., “Extreme hydrothermal conditions at an active plate-bounding fault,” Nature, vol. 546, pp. 137–140, 2017
46
Li J., Zhang Q., Yu T., Zhang M., Zhang J., Qiao L., and Wang T., “R-DTS with heat transfer functional model for perceiving the surrounding temperature,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 816–822, 2020
Appendix
Less
Year 2021 volume 2021 Issue 3
PDF
59
33
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/2021/5612850
  • Receive Date：2020-12-26
  • Online Date：2026-10-27
  • Published：2021-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2020-12-26
  • Accepted：2021-02-19
Funding
UESTC-ZTT joint laboratory project(H04W180463)
111 project(B14039)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61975025; 61705032)
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory of Optical Fiber Sensing and Communications (Education Ministry of China), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China
    2Research Centre of Optical Fiber Sensing, Zhejiang Laboratory, Hangzhou 310000 China
    3Optical Fiber Co., Ltd., ZTT Group, Nantong 226009 China
    4Carbonene Technology Co., Ltd, Deyang 618000 China
    5Optical Science and Technology Ltd., China National Petroleum Corporation, Chengdu 610041, China
    6Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK
    7Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/2021/5612850
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House