收藏切换
A Nanopore Phosphorylation Sensor for Single Oligonucleotides and Peptides
收藏切换
PDF
Yi-Lun Ying1, 2, Jie Yang3, Fu-Na Meng3, Shuang Li3, Meng-Ying Li1, 2, Yi-Tao Long1
Research. Vol 2019 Article ID 1050735
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2019 Article ID 1050735
• Research Article •
A Nanopore Phosphorylation Sensor for Single Oligonucleotides and Peptides
Full
Yi-Lun Ying1, 2, Jie Yang3, Fu-Na Meng3, Shuang Li3, Meng-Ying Li1, 2, Yi-Tao Long1
Affiliations
  • 11 State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
  • 22 Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center, Nanjing 210023 China
  • 33 School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

Yi-Lun Ying and Jie Yang contribute equally to this work.

Published: 2019-10-20 doi: 10.34133/2019/1050735
Outline
收藏切换

The phosphorylation of oligonucleotides and peptides plays a critical role in regulating virtually all cellular processes. To fully understand these complex and fundamental regulatory pathways, the cellular phosphorylate changes of both oligonucleotides and peptides should be simultaneously identified and characterized. Here, we demonstrated a single-molecule, high-throughput, label-free, general, and one-step aerolysin nanopore method to comprehensively evaluate the phosphorylation of both oligonucleotide and peptide substrates. By virtue of electrochemically confined effects in aerolysin, our results show that the phosphorylation accelerates the traversing speed of a negatively charged substrate for about hundreds of time while significantly enhances the translocation frequency of a positively charged substrate. Thereby, the kinase/phosphatase activity could be directly measured with the aerolysin nanopore from the characteristically dose-dependent event frequency of the substrates. By using this straightforward approach, a model T4 oligonucleotide kinase (PNK) further achieved the nanopore evaluation of its phosphatase activity and real-time monitoring of its phosphatase-catalyzed dephosphorylation at a single-molecule level. Our study provides a step forward to nanopore enzymology for analyzing the phosphorylation of both oligonucleotides and peptides with significant feasibility in fundamental biochemical researches, clinical diagnosis, and kinase/phosphatase-targeted drug discovery.

Yi-Lun Ying, Jie Yang, Fu-Na Meng, Shuang Li, Meng-Ying Li, Yi-Tao Long. A Nanopore Phosphorylation Sensor for Single Oligonucleotides and Peptides[J]. Research, 2019 , 2019 (10) : 1050735 - . DOI: 10.34133/2019/1050735
Phosphorylation plays a ubiquitous and essential role in regulating almost all biological functions. The level of oligonucleotide and peptide phosphorylation is well modulated by both kinases and phosphatases [1–5]. Although the importance of oligonucleotide/peptide phosphorylation has long been recognized, an appreciation for the complex and fundamental role of phosphorylation state is still required [6, 7]. The multiple phosphorylation of oligonucleotide/peptide works together to contribute to the outcome of the signaling pathway. To fully understand this complex and fundamental regulatory process, the phosphorylation changes of both oligonucleotides and peptides must be identified and characterized rapidly. Although a variety of methods have been developed to assess the evaluation of oligonucleotide/peptide phosphorylation, including radiometric assays [8], fluorescence [9, 10], chemiluminescence [11], electrochemistry [12, 13], surface plasmon resonance [14], mass spectrometry [15], and nano-CT imaging [16], these methods are only effective to either oligonucleotide or peptide phosphorylation. Moreover, the present methods suffer from harmful radioactive labels, sophisticated and costly fluorescence labels, multistep detection procedures, inadequate contact in reactants, and expensive recognition proteins. These drawbacks limit the generalization of the method to be appropriate for evaluations of the phosphorylation state in the cases of both oligonucleotides and peptides. Much less, the monitoring of the phosphorylation also requires a single-molecule approach for the identification of a rare population of phosphorylated substrates from the native substrates. Therefore, it is still challenging but highly desirable to develop a simple, convenient, label-free, and generalized sensor for phosphorylation detection on both oligonucleotides and peptides.
A single biological membrane protein-based single-biomolecule interface provides a single-molecule nanopore platform for sensitive detection of DNA/RNA [17–22], peptides [23–25], proteins [26–29], enzymes [30, 31], and host-guest molecules [32, 33]. The confined nanopore interface effectively captures a single molecule from the bulk solution at an applied potential, resulting in the typical ionic blockages for each analyte. Although previous nanopore studies evaluate the phosphorylation of the peptides, it requires genetic engineering of the peptides into the biological nanopores and/or chemical modification of the leading DNA sequence on the model peptides [34–37]. Moreover, the previous nanopore sensing interface (e.g., α-hemolysin) exhibits less sensitivity for directly identifying the phosphorylation states of oligonucleotides through the reading of ionic current. Therefore, an efficient nanopore sensing interface with robust interactions with the phosphate groups of oligonucleotides/peptides is urgently demanded for directly distinguishing the phosphorylation from the native substrates. An aerolysin nanopore owns an extremely strong sensing interface to interact with charged oligonucleotides [38–40] and peptides [24, 25], which realizes the discrimination of a single-nucleotide difference of oligonucleotides as well as the length and charge difference of the peptides. Among all the reported biological nanopores, the aerolysin shows the largest effective charge value for confining the oligonucleotides/peptides inside its β-barrel without the needs of motor proteins or labels [25]. Herein, we employed the electrochemical confinement of the aerolysin nanopore to achieve general and feasible nanopore phosphorylation sensors of both oligonucleotides and peptides (Figure 1(a) and (b)). Our statistical results of oligonucleotides and peptides demonstrate that the phosphorylation significantly regulates their traversing speed for about hundreds of time, which could be directly read from the duration as well as the frequency of ionic current signatures (Figure 1(c)–(f)). We further selected the substrate oligonucleotide sequence of poly(dA)4 for the model T4 oligonucleotide kinase (PNK) to achieve the proof-of-concept experiments which are aimed at label-free evaluation of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation-related enzyme activity with nanopore methods. PNK plays a critical role in a majority of normal cellular events, including DNA recombination, DNA replication, and the repair of DNA during strand interruption [41, 42]. Our results demonstrate that one-step strategy is successfully applied to monitor the phosphatase-catalyzed dephosphorylation of the oligonucleotide at a single-molecule level. Our approach presents significant advantages over traditional kinase/phosphatase assays [9, 43]. Therefore, the presented nanopore sensor shows the significant efficient for characterizing the phosphorylation of both oligonucleotides and peptides, which is potentially beneficial for the fundamental biochemical researches, clinical diagnosis, and kinase/phosphatase-targeted drug discovery.
As shown in Figure 1(c), we employed the aerolysin sensing interface to identify both the oligonucleotides and peptides’ phosphorylate state. As for the proof of concept for studying the aerolysin sensing ability of oligonucleotide phosphorylation, poly(dA)4 (5′-AAAA-3′) and poly(dA)5 (5′-AAAAA-3′) were chosen as the model oligonucleotide substrates. First, the poly(dA)4 and poly(dA)5 were added into the cap side of the aerolysin nanopore. The applied potential was set at +120 mV while the cap side was defined as a virtual ground. Both poly(dA)4 and poly(dA)5 without phosphorylation illustrate one prominent translocation population in the scatter plots of the duration and residual current ratio (I/I0) (Figure 1(c) and (d), right). Here, I represents the residual current, while I0 stands for the open pore current. I/I0 reflects the residual current depth. These results are consistent with our previous finding that the translocation of negatively charged poly(dA)n (3≤n≤10) produces the sharp distribution of blockage current with duration time as long as tens of milliseconds [38]. Since the poly(dA)5 owns one nucleotide longer than poly(dA)4, it leads to a larger current blockage amplitude with a statistical I/I0 of 0.39. After the phosphorylation at 3′ end, the poly(dA)4-3′-P hardly produces the blockages longer than 0.5 ms (Figure 1(c), left). Similarly, the phosphorlation of poly(dA)5-3′-P significantly decreases the statistical translocation duration from 3.6 ms to less than 1 ms (Figure 1(d), left). Since the addition of the phosphate group at the 3′ terminal of the oligonucleotide provides the additional two negatively charges, it induces the stronger electrophoresis force acting on the oligonucleotides. Therefore, the phosphorylated oligonucleotides behave at a faster translocation speed through the aerolysin nanopore than the native oligonucleotide. The length-dependent translocation speed is accelerated for both poly(dA)4-3′-P and poly(dA)5′-3′-P. The detail mechaniusms of the phosphorylation-driven acceleration are currently under studying in our group.
Unlike the oligonucleotide carriers of uniform negative charges, the peptides always bear nonuniform negative and positive charges. Therefore, the nanopore phosphorylation sensors for peptides not only should be sensitive to the phosphorylation of negatively charged peptide but also are supposed to generate the distinguishable blockage differences for the phosphorylation of positively charged peptide. To demonstrate the sensing ability of the aerolysin nanopore, we first used a peptide sequence of (EYQ)3 with three negatively charged glutamic acids. Figure 1(e) shows that this peptide generates a distinctive population with Gaussian current peak value of I/I0=0.53 and statistical fitted duration of 0.25 ms. This result is consistent with our previous study [25] that the negatively charged peptide experiences a translocation process through the aerolysin nanopore under positive potential. Similar to the identification of phosphorylated oligonucleotide, the phosphorylation of Tyr-8 provides two additional negative charges to the peptide of (EYQ)3, which enhances the electrophoresis force for a fast peptide translocation. Therefore, the rapid translocation of phosphorylated (EYQ)3 hardly shows any blockages due to the bandwidth limitation of the amplifier. (Figure 1(e), left). This distinguishable differences on the event durations and frequencies between (EYQ)3 and phosphorylated (EYQ)3 demonstrate that the aerolysin nanopore could be extended to the evaluation of the phosphorylation for the negatively charged peptide. Then, we further study the aerolysin sensing ability of positively charged peptide with and without phosphorylation. Under the applied potential of +120 mV, the positively charged peptide of LRRASLG hardly enters into the aerolysin nanopore, resulting in few blockages (Figure 1(f)). After phosphorylation of Ser-5, the net charge of the peptide decreases from +2 to 0 at pH=7.5, leading to the enhanced driving force at +120 mV. Consequently, the number of blockages obviously increases after the phosphorylation of LRRASLG, which shows a Gaussian peak value of I/I0=0.59 and exponential fitted duration of 1.2 ms. Overall, the phosphorylation of the oligonucleotides and peptides increases the carrying negative charges of the substrate, which leads to the distinctive regulation of the driving force for the translocation through the aerolysin nanopore. As to the negatively charged oligonucleotides and peptides, the phosphorylation accelerates the translocation speed of the substrate, resulting in the significant decrease of the duration time for the main distribution of the blockages. Since the majority of the phosphorylated oligonucleotides/peptides with short durations are below the bandwidth of amplifier (5 kHz), the blockage frequency in the main distribution would be decreased accordingly. As to the positively charged peptide, the phosphorylation allows it to enter and then interact with the β-barrel of the aerolysin. Therefore, the phosphorylation of positively charged peptide “turns on” the characteristic blockages in the main distribution. Note that the difference of the duration time and frequency depends mainly on the initial net charges and the length of the native oligonucleotide/peptide. Moreover, previous studies showed [24, 25, 44] that the limit of detection for nanopore sensing of short oligonucleotide poly(dA)n (3≤n≤10) could reach to as low as 1.0×10−13 M while that for the short peptide is expected to a nanomolar level. The high capture rate of both oligonucleotides and peptide ensures the low limit of detection for the phosphorylation sensing without amplification methods. Therefore, the aerolysin nanopore could achieve direct and label-free discrimination of single-molecule phosphorylation of both oligonucleotides and peptides via monitoring the frequency and duration responses from the characteristic blockages.
The kinase and phosphatase could induce the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the oligonucleotide/peptide. Based on the above mechanism, one could expect to monitor the frequency responses of characteristic blockages from the oligonucleotide/peptide substrate to evaluate single-molecule kinase/phosphatase activity with this general aerolysin nanopore sensor. For the proof of concept, we further select PNK as a model system. In the presence of Mg2+, PNK can remove the 3′phospotase group of poly(dA)4-3′-P [41, 45]. Then, the assays for assessing PNK activity were performed as follows: Briefly, 100 μL reaction solution containing 100 μM poly(dA)4-3′-P and 10 mM MgCl2 was incubated with a certain concentration of PNK at 37°C. The reaction was quenched by heating to 65°C for 20 min to denature the enzyme after incubation for 1 h. Full experimental details can be found in Supplementary Information. The reaction solution was premixed with 900  μL electrolyte solution and then added into the cap side chamber. After the insertion of the aerolysin nanopore to the lipid bilayer, the analyzed solution containing 100  μM poly(dA)4-3′-P without PNK hardly induces the typical current blockages with a long duration at +120 mV (Figure 2(a)) while the typical blockage events emerged evidently in the presence of PNK as expected (Figure 2b–d). The PNK catalysis products of A4 generates typical blockage events, which were mainly distributed in the target distribution with duration time ranging from 1 to 100 ms and I/I0 falling between 0.4 and 0.6 (Figure 1(e)). The enlargement of the typical blockage events is shown in Figure S5.
To probe the relationship between the PNK concentrations and its catalysis-induced event frequencies, the different concentrations of PNK ranging from 0.01 to 0.1 U/μL were successively added into the cap side of the aerolysin nanopore. Here, we defined the frequency of typical blockage events in the target distribution as fr. When the concentration of PNK increases from 0.01 to 0.1 U/μL, the fr increases from 14.47±0.04 s-1 to 46.18±0.13 s-1. There exists a positive correlation between PNK concentration and fr (Figure S6 and Table S1). The strategies which could be further used to enhance the capture rate include optimizing the concentration gradient and the types of electrolytes [46, 47], reducing the volume of the chamber, and designing the mutagenized aerolysin [48]. Therefore, it is possible to achieve a much lower detection limit compared to other various sensitive PNK detection methods.
To perform the real-time monitoring of the PNK-catalyzed dephosphorylation, the enzymatic catalysis was directly carried out in the cap side compartment containing 20 μM poly(dA)4-3′-P and 10 mM MgCl2. Hardly, any typical blockage events were observed before the addition of PNK to the chamber (Figure S8). After the addition of 0.25 U/μL PNK, the typical blockage events are clearly observed (Figure 3(a)). According to the statistical analysis, the typical blockage events are also distributed in the target region in which the I/I0 is between 0.4 and 0.6, and the duration is longer than 1 ms (Figure S6). Moreover, as shown in Figure 3(b), the frequency of the typical events increases with the recording time. Since the active PNK scarcely induces any interfere, the variation of the typical blockage event frequency here is resulted from the increase of the catalyzed product poly(dA)4 in the cap chamber. Thus, this result evidences the feasibility of aerolysin nanopore for achieving a real-time recording of the enzyme-catalyzed dephosphorylation process, which allows the potential monitoring of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation kinetics at the single-molecule level.
These above mechanisms and observed results demonstrate that the aerolysin sensor reported here could achieve label-free and general evaluation of the phosphorylation of oligonucleotides and peptides, leading to an accurate quantification of the corresponding enzyme catalysis activity. The advantages of the aerolysin nanopore strategy show but not limit to the following charming advantages: (1) the strong ability for the sensitive response to the charge states of both DNA and peptide substrates thereby directly regulates the event duration as well as the frequency without exogenous labels, immobilization, and cooperative enzymes. Employing this generalized nanopore approach, one has the potential to characterize the complex regulatory process resulting from both DNA and protein kinases/phosphatases. (2) Few ionic responses to the background [49] ensure the potential of the aerolysin nanopore not only to screen large-scale inhibitors but also to direct assay kinase/phosphatase activity in cell lysate. This feature provides the possibility for the aerolysin nanopore in intracellularly analyzing the multiple kinase and phosphatase functions. (3) Long-term stability and high reproducibility ensure the long-time monitoring of the kinase/phosphatase activity. In further combination with solid-state material (e.g., quartz nanopipette) for supporting aerolysin nanopore, the aerolysin nanopore may eventually achieve the single cell evaluation of kinase/phosphatase.
We could anticipant that our generalized strategy facilitates the understanding of phosphorylation-involved cellular signaling pathway. Moreover, the diagnostic application would build upon our initial findings with the further improvements of clinical sampling system (e.g., parallel microfluidics chip).
  • National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-Notch Talent
  • Nanjing University(ZYJH004)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(61871183; 21834001; 21922405)
1
Adams J. A., “Kinetic and catalytic mechanisms of protein kinases,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 2271–2290, 2001
2
Johnson L. N., and Lewis R. J., “Structural basis for control by phosphorylation,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 2209–2242, 2001
3
Manning G., Whyte D. B., Martinez R., Hunter T., and Sudarsanam S., “The protein kinase complement of the human genome,” Science, vol. 298, no. 5600, pp. 1912–1934, 2002
4
Su S. C., and Tsai L. H., “Cyclin-dependent kinases in brain development and disease,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 27, pp. 465–491, 2011
5
Liu X., and Winey M., “The MPS1 family of protein kinases,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 81, pp. 561–585, 2012
6
Geraldes P., and King G. L., “Activation of protein kinase C isoforms and its impact on diabetic complications,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1319–1331, 2010
7
Zaha V. G., and Young L. H., “AMP-activated protein kinase regulation and biological actions in the heart,” Circulation Research, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 800–814, 2012
8
Altai M., Orlova A., and Tolmachev V., “Radiolabeled probes targeting tyrosine-kinase receptors for personalized medicine,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 20, no. 14, pp. 2275–2292, 2014
9
Lin L., Liu Y., Zhao X., and Li J., “Sensitive and rapid screening of T4 polynucleotide kinase activity and inhibition based on coupled exonuclease reaction and graphene oxide platform,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, no. 22, pp. 8396–8402, 2011
10
Xu X., Liu X., Nie Z., Pan Y., Guo M., and Yao S., “Label-free fluorescent detection of protein kinase activity based on the aggregation behavior of unmodified quantum dots,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 52–59, 2011
11
Tang W., Zhu G., and Zhang C. Y., “Sensitive detection of polynucleotide kinase using rolling circle amplification-induced chemiluminescence,” Chemical Communications, vol. 50, no. 36, pp. 4733–4735, 2014
12
Wang Z., Sun N., He Y., Liu Y., and Li J., “DNA assembled gold nanoparticles polymeric network blocks modular highly sensitive electrochemical biosensors for protein kinase activity analysis and inhibition,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 6153–6159, 2014
13
Yi F., Huang X., and Ren J., “Simple and sensitive method for determination of protein kinase activity based on surface charge change of peptide-modified gold nanoparticles as substrates,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 3871–3877, 2018
14
Yan Z., Wang Z., Miao Z., and Liu Y., “Dye-sensitized and localized surface plasmon resonance enhanced visible-light photoelectrochemical biosensors for highly sensitive analysis of protein kinase activity,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 922–929, 2015
15
Deng Z., Ye M., Bian Y., Liu Z., Liu F., Wang C., Qin H., and Zou H., “Multiplex isotope dimethyl labeling of substrate peptides for high throughput kinase activity assay via quantitative MALDI MS,” Chemical Communications, vol. 50, no. 90, pp. 13960–13962, 2014
16
Zheng Z., Tang A., Guan Y., Chen L., Wang F., Chen P., Wang W., Luo Y., Tian Y., and Liang G., “Nanocomputed tomography imaging of bacterial alkaline phosphatase activity with an iodinated hydrogelator,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 24, pp. 11982–11985, 2016
17
Kasianowicz J. J., Brandin E., Branton D., and Deamer D. W., “Characterization of individual polynucleotide molecules using a membrane channel,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 24, pp. 13770–13773, 1996
18
Keyser U. F., Koeleman B. N., van Dorp S., Krapf D., Smeets R. M. M., Lemay S. G., Dekker N. H., and Dekker C., “Direct force measurements on DNA in a solid-state nanopore,” Nature Physics, vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 473–477, 2006
19
Ying Y.-L., Zhang J., Gao R., and Long Y.-T., “Nanopore-based sequencing and detection of nucleic acids,” Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, vol. 52, no. 50, pp. 13154–13161, 2013
20
An N., Fleming A. M., White H. S., and Burrows C. J., “Crown ether-electrolyte interactions permit nanopore detection of individual DNA abasic sites in single molecules,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 29, pp. 11504–11509, 2012
21
Zhang X., Zhang D., Zhao C., Tian K., Shi R., du X., Burcke A. J., Wang J., Chen S. J., and Gu L. Q., “Nanopore electric snapshots of an RNA tertiary folding pathway,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, no. 1, article 1458, 2017
22
Larkin J., Henley R. Y., Jadhav V., Korlach J., and Wanunu M., “Length-independent DNA packing into nanopore zero-mode waveguides for low-input DNA sequencing,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1169–1175, 2017
23
Asandei A., Chinappi M., Kang H. K., Seo C. H., Mereuta L., Park Y., and Luchian T., “Acidity-mediated, electrostatic tuning of asymmetrically charged peptides interactions with protein nanopores,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 30, pp. 16706–16714, 2015
24
Piguet F., Ouldali H., Pastoriza-Gallego M., Manivet P., Pelta J., and Oukhaled A., “Identification of single amino acid differences in uniformly charged homopolymeric peptides with aerolysin nanopore,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 966, 2018
25
Li S., Cao C., Yang J., and Long Y. T., “Detection of peptides with different charges and lengths by using the aerolysin nanopore,” ChemElectroChem, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 126–129, 2019
26
Waduge P., Hu R., Bandarkar P., Yamazaki H., Cressiot B., Zhao Q., Whitford P. C., and Wanunu M., “Nanopore-based measurements of protein size, fluctuations, and conformational changes,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 5706–5716, 2017
27
Zhou S., Wang L., Chen X., and Guan X., “Label-free nanopore single-molecule measurement of trypsin activity,” ACS Sensors, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 607–613, 2016
28
Fahie M. A., and Chen M., “Electrostatic interactions between OmpG nanopore and analyte protein surface can distinguish between glycosylated isoforms,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 119, no. 32, pp. 10198–10206, 2015
29
Hu R., Diao J., Li J., Tang Z., Li X., Leitz J., Long J., Liu J., Yu D., and Zhao Q., “Intrinsic and membrane-facilitated α-synuclein oligomerization revealed by label-free detection through solid-state nanopores,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 20776, 2016
30
Zhao Q., de Zoysa R. S. S., Wang D., Jayawardhana D. A., and Guan X., “Real-time monitoring of peptide cleavage using a nanopore probe,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 131, no. 18, pp. 6324–6325, 2009
31
Willems K., Van Meervelt V., Wloka C., and Maglia G., “Single-molecule nanopore enzymology,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, vol. 372, no. 1726, 2017
32
Meng F. N., Yao X., Ying Y.-L., Zhang J., Tian H., and Long Y.-T., “Single-molecule analysis of the self-assembly process facilitated by host–guest interactions,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1202–1205, 2015
33
Li T., Liu L., Li Y., Xie J., and Wu H. C., “A universal strategy for aptamer‐based nanopore sensing through host–guest interactions inside α‐hemolysin,” Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, vol. 54, no. 26, pp. 7568–7571, 2015
34
Harrington L., Alexander L. T., Knapp S., and Bayley H., “Pim kinase inhibitors evaluated with a single‐molecule engineered nanopore sensor,” Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, vol. 54, no. 28, pp. 8154–8159, 2015
35
Harrington L., Cheley S., Alexander L. T., Knapp S., and Bayley H., “Stochastic detection of Pim protein kinases reveals electrostatically enhanced association of a peptide substrate,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 47, pp. E4417–E4426, 2013
36
Rosen C. B., Rodriguez-Larrea D., and Bayley H., “Single-molecule site-specific detection of protein phosphorylation with a nanopore,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 179–181, 2014
37
Harrington L., Alexander L. T., Knapp S., and Bayley H., “Single-molecule protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation by nanopore enzymology,” ACS Nano, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 633–641, 2019
38
Cao C., Ying Y.-L., Hu Z. L., Liao D. F., Tian H., and Long Y.-T., “Discrimination of oligonucleotides of different lengths with a wild-type aerolysin nanopore,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 713–718, 2016
39
Cao C., Li M. Y., Cirauqui N., Wang Y. Q., Dal Peraro M., Tian H., and Long Y. T., “Mapping the sensing spots of aerolysin for single oligonucleotides analysis,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, article 2823, 2018
40
Wang Y. Q., Li M. Y., Qiu H., Cao C., Wang M. B., Wu X. Y., Huang J., Ying Y.-L., and Long Y.-T., “Identification of essential sensitive regions of the aerolysin nanopore for single oligonucleotide analysis,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 90, no. 13, pp. 7790–7794, 2018
41
Wang L. K., Lima C. D., and Shuman S., “Structure and mechanism of T4 polynucleotide kinase: an RNA repair enzyme,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 3873–3880, 2002
42
Amitsur M., Levitz R., and Kaufmann G., “Bacteriophage T4 anticodon nuclease, polynucleotide kinase and RNA ligase reprocess the host lysine tRNA,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 2499–2503, 1987
43
Wang L. J., Zhang Q., Tang B., and Zhang C. Y., “Single-molecule detection of polynucleotide kinase based on phosphorylation-directed recovery of fluorescence quenched by au nanoparticles,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 89, no. 13, pp. 7255–7261, 2017
44
Cao C., Yu J., Li M. Y., Wang Y. Q., Tian H., and Long Y.-T., “Direct readout of single nucleobase variations in an oligonucleotide,” Small, vol. 13, no. 44, article 1702011, 2017
45
Cameron V., and Uhlenbeck O. C., “3′-Phosphatase activity in T4 polynucleotide kinase,” Biochemistry, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 5120–5126, 1977
46
Wanunu M., Morrison W., Rabin Y., Grosberg A. Y., and Meller A., “Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 160–165, 2010
47
Hu Z. L., Li M. Y., Liu S. C., Ying Y.-L., and Long Y.-T., “A lithium-ion-active aerolysin nanopore for effectively trapping long single-stranded DNA,” Chemical Science, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 354–358, 2019
48
Ying Y.-L., Cao C., Hu Y. X., and Long Y.-T., “A single biomolecule interface for advancing the sensitivity, selectivity and accuracy of sensors,” National Science Review, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 450–452, 2018
49
Yu J., Cao C., and Long Y.-T., “Selective and Sensitive Detection of Methylcytosine by Aerolysin Nanopore under Serum Condition,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 89, no. 21, pp. 11685–11689, 2017
Year 2019 volume 2019 Issue 10
PDF
47
28
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.34133/2019/1050735
  • Receive Date:2019-05-27
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2019-10-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2019-05-27
  • Accepted:2019-10-07
Funding
National Ten Thousand Talent Program for Young Top-Notch Talent
Nanjing University(ZYJH004)
National Natural Science Foundation of China(61871183; 21834001; 21922405)
Affiliations
    11 State Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Life Science, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
    22 Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center, Nanjing 210023 China
    33 School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.34133/2019/1050735
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT