收藏切换
Topological Nodal States in Circuit Lattice
收藏切换
PDF
Kaifa Luo1, Rui Yu1, Hongming Weng2
Research. Vol 2018 Article ID 6793752
Less
收藏切换
Research. Vol 2018 Article ID 6793752
• Research Article •
Topological Nodal States in Circuit Lattice
Full
Kaifa Luo1, Rui Yu1, Hongming Weng2
Affiliations
  • 1School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
  • 2Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
About Author:

Authors’ Contributions

Rui Yu conceived the research. Rui Yu, Kaifa Luo, and Hongming Weng performed the theoretical analysis and the calculations. All authors contributed to the manuscript writing.

Published: 2018-09-20 doi: 10.1155/2018/6793752
Outline
收藏切换

The search for artificial structure with tunable topological properties is an interesting research direction of today’s topological physics. Here, we introduce a scheme to realize topological nodal states with a three-dimensional periodic inductor-capacitor (LC) circuit lattice, where the topological nodal line state and Weyl state can be achieved by tuning the parameters of inductors and capacitors. A tight-binding-like model is derived to analyze the topological properties of the LC circuit lattice. The key characters of the topological states, such as the drumhead-like surface bands for nodal line state and the Fermi arc-like surface bands for Weyl state, are found in these systems. We also show that the Weyl points are stable with the fabrication errors of electric devices.

Kaifa Luo, Rui Yu, Hongming Weng. Topological Nodal States in Circuit Lattice[J]. Research, 2018 , 2018 (9) : 6793752 - . DOI: 10.1155/2018/6793752
Recently, there is great interest in realizing topological states in various platforms. Topological states, including the quantum Hall states, quantum spin Hall states, Dirac states, Weyl states, and nodal line states, have achieved significant progresses in electronic materials [1–12], cold atoms [13–22], photonics [23–29], phononics [30–36], and mechanical systems [37–47]. In addition, the topological properties in electric circuit system have also been explored in several works [48–53]. The quantum spin Hall-like states have been proposed in two-dimensional circuit lattice via time-reversal symmetric Hofstadter model [48, 49]. The Weyl state has been found in three-dimensional circuit network and proposed to be able to be detected from the boundary resonant signal [51]. The topological Zak phase is discussed in the one-dimensional SSH-type circuit lattice [52]. These proposed electric circuits are composed of interconnected linear lossless passive elements, such as capacitors and inductors. The significant advantages of the circuit lattice are that the parameters of the system are independently artificial adjustable and the symmetry of the lattice is protected by the parameters of electronic components and the way they are connected, rather than their positions in the real space.
From symmetry considerations, three types of nodal line states have been proposed in a great number of literatures [54–56]. Type-A is protected by mirror reflection symmetry [28, 57–61], type-B is protected by the coexistence of time-reversal and space inversion symmetry [20, 21, 59, 62–72], and type-C is protected by the nonsymmorphic space group [73–76]. While the existence of Weyl points does not require any crystalline symmetries except the lattice translational symmetry, Weyl points can only appear when the bands degeneracy is removed by breaking either time-reversal [3, 4] or spacial inversion symmetry [5, 6] as summarized in the review articles [10–12]. In the present work, we demonstrate a feasible strategy to design both nodal line state and Weyl state in a three-dimensional circuit lattice. The nodal line structure we obtained belongs to type-B as discussed above. The Weyl state is achieved by breaking the spacial inversion symmetry. The topological phase transition between them can be controlled by tuning the parameters of the components. In order to investigate their topological properties, we transform the circuit network problem to a tight-binding-like model. Based on the tight-binding model, the novel surface states, including drumhead-like surface bands for nodal line state and Fermi arc-like surface bands for Weyl state, are found in the surface of the circuit lattices. Moreover, the stability of the Weyl points under perturbation of fabrication errors is studied.
The design scheme of realizing the nodal line state and Weyl state in LC circuit lattice is shown below. We consider a honeycomb lattice consisting of capacitors and inductors in a-b plane as a starting point. The subnodes A and B are linked by capacitors C1, C2, and C3. Every node A (B) is grounded through the parallel connected inductor LA (LB) and capacitor CGA (CGB) as shown in Figure 1(a). Similar to the electronic band structure of graphene, the frequency spectrum of the single layer LC honeycomb lattice contains two band-crossing points in the two-dimensional Brillouin zone (BZ). Stacking the two-dimensional honeycomb lattice along c direction without any coupling between each other, the band-crossing points will form two straight nodal lines in the three-dimensional BZ as shown in Figure 1(a). In order to make the straight nodal lines kc dependent, we connect nodes A and B between neighbor-layers with C4 as shown in Figure 1(b). By tuning the value of C4, these two separate lines are deformed and merged into a closed ring, namely, the nodal line we are searching for. The nodal line structure is protected by the coexistence of time-reversal and space inversion symmetry. If the space inversion symmetry of the circuit system is removed, the continuous nodal line may be degenerated to discrete Weyl points [25]. Following this insight, nodes A-A and B-B between the nearest-neighbor-layers are connected with CA and CB, respectively, as shown in Figure 1(c). CA and CB and CGA and CGB are deliberately set to be different, resulting in the space inversion symmetry breaking and emergence of the Weyl points. The LC circuit lattice in Figure 1(c) can be deformed to Figure 1(d). The latter is more convenient to construction of circuit elements in experiments with spectrum topologically invariable. The band structures and the topological properties of the nodal line state and Weyl state for lattice given in Figures 1(b), 1(c), and 1(d) will be detailed in the remain text.
Here, we study the resonance condition of the circuit lattice, where a nonzero distribution of potential satisfies Kirchhoff’s law. We follow the method given in Ref. [77], where the periodical circuit lattice problem is transformed into a tight-binding-like model in the momentum space. This approach relies on an analogy between Kirchhoff current equation in periodic circuit lattice and the quantum mechanics with periodic crystalline structure. Therefore, the circuit band structure arises in a manner analogous to electronic band structure in crystals. The tight-binding-like model for the circuit lattice in Figures 1(c) and 1(d) is given as
(1)HkVk=1ω2LVk,
where
(2)Hk=∑i=03dikσi,
ω is the resonance frequency of the circuit lattice, matrix L=diag⁡LA,LB, V=(VA,VB)T is the Bloch states for the potential distributions, and the Pauli matrices are for the space spanned by (VA,VB). The coefficients in front of the Pauli matrices are given as
(3)d0k=C1+C2+C3+C4+CGA+CGB2+CA+CB1-cos⁡kc,(4)d1k=-C1-C2cos⁡kb-ka-C3cos⁡ka-C4cos⁡kc-ka,(5)d2k=C2sin⁡kb-ka-C3sin⁡ka+C4sin⁡kc-ka,(6)d3k=CGA-CGB2+CA-CB1-cos⁡kc.
To simplify the calculations without loss of generality, we set LA=LB=LG; therefore the matrix L in (1) is proportional to an identity matrix. Solving (1), we obtain two branches of dispersions ω1,2-2(k)=LGd0(k)±d12(k)+d22(k)+d32(k) in the BZ. By varying the parameters of capacitor Cis, we can artificially tune the dispersion of ω1,2-2(k) and obtain the desired bands structure. In the following section, we will show that the nodal ring-type and Weyl point-type bands touching points are available in our circuit lattice.
The closed loops of bands crossing points can be protected by the coexistence of space inversion symmetry and time-reversal symmetry [25]. The LC circuit is time-reversal symmetric by nature; we only need to choose a group of parameters of the inductors and capacitors to preserve the space inversion symmetry. For the circuit network given in Figure 1(b), the space inversion symmetry can be obtained by setting CGA=CGB, with the inversion center located at the middle point of node A and node B. In this case, d3k vanishes (CA=CB=0 in Figure 1(b)). The conditions for bands degeneracy require d1k=0 and d2(k)=0 to be satisfied simultaneously, leading to two restrictions for three variables k=(ka,kb,kc), which gives one-dimensional solution space and forms a continuous nodal ring in the k space. Figure 2(a) illustrates obtained nodal ring structure centered at Y=(0,π,0) point. The band dispersions along Γ-M-A-Y-B-M-Γ are shown in Figure 2(b), where A and B are two nodal points in kc=0 plane.
The topological properties of a nodal line can be inferred from the winding number (-1)ζ1=1/π∮CA(k)·dk, where A(k) is the Berry connection and C is a closed loop in the momentum space pierced by the nodal line. ζ1=1 in our model means that the nodal line is topologically stable. Due to the bulk-boundary correspondence, the nontrivial nodal line structure indicates a novel surface state. Based on the tight-binding-like model 2, the surface state in the (001) direction is calculated as shown in Figure 2(c), where a flat surface band nestles inside of the projected node-ring. In order to relate the nontrivial topology induced by the bulk band singularity to edge modes, we calculate the Berry phase of the one-dimensional systems Hk∥(kc) parameterized by the in-plane momentum k∥=(ka,kb). The Berry phase for the one-dimensional system is defined as θk∥=∫Ak∥dk⊥, where Ak∥ is the Berry connection matrix defined as Ak∥=V1k∣i∂kcV1k. In the one-dimensional parametrized systems, the Berry phase equals π for k∥ inside the nodal ring, while it is zero for k∥ outside the nodal ring as shown in Figure 2(d).
Starting with nodal line states, Dirac states or Weyl states are possible to emerge by introducing symmetry breaking terms [25]. Here we show the Weyl states can be realized in the circuit lattice shown in Figures 1(c) and 1(d). The space inversion symmetry of the circuit lattice is easy to be removed by setting CGA≠CGB and CA≠CB. In this case, d1(k) and d2(k) are not affected and the nodal ring structure as solutions of d1(k)=d2(k)=0 remains. Now the gap closing condition further requires d3(k)=0, which leads to cos⁡kc=1+(CGA-CGB)/2(CA-CB). Tuning the parameters of CGA, CGB, CA, and CB to make the absolute value of the right-hand side of the equation less than 1, d3(k)=0 determines two planes perpendicular to kc axis in the first BZ. When these two planes intersect with the nodal ring, as shown in Figure 3(a), there are four crossing points that are the desired Weyl points in the Brillouin zone. Because time-reversal symmetry maps Weyl point at k to -k with the same chirality, to neutralize the chirality in the BZ there must be two other Weyl points with opposite chirality. Therefore the minimal number of Weyl points in our circuit lattice has to be four. The chiralities of the Weyl points are determined in the following way. We calculate the Chern number for the lower bulk bands on the planes perpendicular to ka axis in the 3D BZ. As shown in Figure 3(c), moving along ka, the increasing (decreasing) of Chern number when the plane passes through the Weyl points indicates that the chiral value of the Weyl points is +1  (-1). The Weyl points with +1 chirality are marked with blue star while red points are for -1 chirality in Figure 3(a).
As a result of the nonzero Chern numbers, topologically protected gapless chiral surface states emerge in the band gap away from the Weyl points. An example of the nontrivial surface band dispersions is shown in Figure 3(b). A surface mode profile at the frequency of the Weyl points is also shown in Figure 3(d). Similar to the Fermi arcs in Weyl semimetals, Weyl pairs with opposite chirality are connected through the segment-like surface dispersion in the surface Brillouin zone. The surface “Fermi arc” for (100) and (010) directions surface can be calculated with the similar method.
In the above discussions, the inductance and capacitance in the circuit lattice are proposed as a set of precise values, but the fabrication error of the electronic devices brings about certain range of tolerance values. In this paragraph, we discuss whether the fabrication errors influence the results given above. For the nodal line state, maintaining intrinsic space inversion symmetry is a necessary condition. When the fabrication errors are taken into consideration, intrinsic space inversion symmetry is too demanding to preserve; therefore nodal line becomes unstable. However, the existence of the Weyl points does not require extra symmetries except the discrete translation invariant symmetry. It is expected to be more stable than the nodal line state under the perturbation of the fabrication errors. In order to investigate the stability of the Weyl points in the circuit lattice, we employ a 3×3×3 super cell. In addition, the values of the capacitors’ parameters are randomly taken within a certain range around the precise values. In the language of solid state physics, the hopping terms and on-site energies in (6)-(9) are randomly taken. The details are shown in the materials and methods part. To simplify the calculation without loss of key points, we keep LA and LB fixed. For each value, we repeat calculations 100 times with different random errors and find the minimal value of the gap between band N/2+1 and N/2 in each time. Here, N is the number of total bands for the 3×3×3 super cell. As long as these two bands are not gaped, i.e., the gap is zero, the Weyl points still survive. The numerical results in Figure 4(a) show that the Weyl points exist for tolerance values around the precise value less than 30%. Exceeding this tolerance value, the gap opens and we get a topologically trivial circuit. Take a super cell with ±20% tolerance values, for example, we calculate its band structures along the k line crossing two of the gap closing points. The band dispersions in Figure 4(b) show that two bands cross each other and form a pair of Weyl points near ω-2=5.8(krad/s)-2.
To summarize, we report that the topological nodal line state and Weyl state can be realized in a three-dimensional classical circuit system. We derived a two-by-two tight-binding-like model to investigate its topological nature. Based on this model, we show that the nodal line structure is protected by the inversion symmetry, which can be achieved by setting CGA=CGB and CA=CB. When the inversion symmetry is broken, gap opens along the nodal line, while four Weyl points are left in the first BZ. We also confirm that the Weyl state is robust with the fabrication error of the electrical devices. The key characters of the above two topological state, namely, the drumhead-like surface states for nodal line state and ‘Fermi arcs’ surface state for Weyl state, are conformed by the tight-binding-like model terminated on the (001) direction surface. The topological phase transition between nodal line state and Weyl state can be tuned by changing the parameters of the capacitors and inductors or by controlling the connecting or disconnecting of some elements, for example, the capacitors CA,B and CGA,GB in Figure 1(c), in the circuit lattice. Moreover, in the experimental aspect, the proposed circuit lattice can be manufactured with current technology. The topological properties, such as the patterns for the “Fermi arcs” connecting the Weyl point pairs, can be detected by measuring the potential distribution on the surface of the circuit lattice. This work offers a new, robust platform for realizing and tuning topological nodal line state and Weyl state in the classical system.
In this section, we present the details of the methods used to calculate the band structure of the circuit lattice. We start with deriving the tight-binding-like model given in (1). The current I passing through a two-terminal circuit element for a given drop in voltage Δv is described by Ohm’s law I=YΔv, where Y is admittance. In an alternating current (AC) sinusoidal circuits, the admittance for the ideal inductors and capacitors is YL=1/jωL and YC=jωC, respectively. ω is the frequency for the sinusoidal signal and j=-1, following the convention in electric circuits. The currents flow into nodes A and B in the cell located at R=0 of circuit lattices given in Figures 1(c) and 1(d) of main text are given as
(7)IA0=jωC1vB0-vA0+C2vBb-a-vA0+C3vB-a-vA0+C4vBc-a-vA0+CAvAc-vA0+CAvA-c-vA0+CGA0-vA0+0-vA0jωLA=jωC1vB0+C2vBb-a+C3vB-a+C4vBc-a+CAvAc+CAvA-c-CGA+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CAvA0-vA0jωLA,
and
(8)IB0=jωC1vA0-vB0+C2vAa-b-vB0+C3vAa-vB0+C4vAa-c-vB0+CBvBc-vB0+CBvB-c-vB0+CGB0-vB0+0-vB0jωLB=jωC1vA0+C2vAa-b+C3vAa+C4vAa-c+CBvB-c+CBvBc-CGB+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CBvB0-vB0jωLB.
Kirchhoff’s current law demands that IA(0) and IB(0) are zero. Dividing jω on both sides of (7) and (8), we get
(9)-C1vB0+C2vBb-a+C3vB-a+C4vBc-a+CAvAc+CAvA-c-CGA+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CAvA0=1ω2LAvA0,(10)-C1vA0+C2vAa-b+C3vA-b+C4vAa-c+CBvB-c+CBvBc-CGB+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CBvB0=1ω2LBvB0.
With the similar method, we can obtain the equations for the potential distribution vA(R) and vB(R) on the whole lattice. Writing these equations in a matrix form, we have
(11)YV=1ω2LV,
where V is a vector for the potential distribution on A and B nodes of the circuit lattice, L is a diagonal matrix composed of LA and LB, and Y is the admittance matrix containing all information of the involving capacitors in our circuit. Equation (11) is an eigenvalue problem, in which V is the wave function and 1/ω2L is the eigenvalue. Following this insight, the admittance matrix Y can be interpreted as tight-binding Hamiltonian in real space. Hopping terms and on-site energies of the tight-binding model can be extracted from (9) and (10), which are listed below:
(12)HABR=0=-C1;HABR=b-a=-C2;HABR=-a=-C3;(13)HABR=c-a=-C4;HAAR=±c=-CA;HBBR=±c=-CB;(14)HAAR=0=CGA+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CA;(15)HBBR=0=CGB+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CB,
where R is the lattice vector and Hmn(R) are the tight-binding parameters between node m located at the home unit cell and node n located at R. With these terms, the tight-bind Hamiltonian in the momentum k space can be obtained through Fourier transformation Hmn(k)=∑Reik·RHmn(R). The elements of the Hamiltonian are given as
(16)HAAk=CGA+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CA-CAeikc+e-ikc,(17)HBBk=CGB+C1+C2+C3+C4+2CB-CBeikc+e-ikc,(18)HABk=-C1-C2eikb-ka-C3e-ika-C4eikc-ka,
with the Bloch-like basis function Vmk=∑Reik·R|vm(R)〉,  m=A,B. Rewriting the 2 by 2 Hamiltonian matrix with the help of Pauli matrices, we get
(19)Hk=∑i=03dikσi
with
(20)d0k=C1+C2+C3+C4+CGA+CGB2+CA+CB1-cos⁡kc,(21)d1k=-C1-C2cos⁡kb-ka-C3cos⁡ka-C4cos⁡kc-ka,(22)d2k=C2sin⁡kb-ka-C3sin⁡ka+C4sin⁡kc-ka,(23)d3k=CGA-CGB2+CA-CB1-cos⁡kc,
which is the tight-binding-like model given in (2).
For the single layer honeycomb circuit lattice given in Figure 1(a), C4, CA, and CB vanish. If we set CGA=CGB, we have
(24)d1k=-C1-C2cos⁡kb-ka-C3cos⁡ka,(25)d2k=C2sin⁡kb-ka-C3sin⁡ka,
and
(26)d3k=0.
The appearance of gap closing points requires d1(k)=d2(k)=0, which lead to
(27)C1+C2e-ika-kb+C3e-ika=0.
As long as the three values of C1, C2, and C3 satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, two band-crossing points can be found in the ka-kb plane.
1
Hasan M. Z., and Kane C. L., “Colloquium: topological insulators,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 3045–3067, 2010
2
Qi X.-L., and Zhang S.-C., “Topological insulators and superconductors,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 1057–1110, 2011
3
Wan X., Turner A. M., Vishwanath A., and Savrasov S. Y., “Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 83, no. 20, 2011
4
Xu G., Weng H., Wang Z., Dai X., and Fang Z., “Chern semimetal and the quantized anomalous Hall effect in HgCr 2Se4,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 18, 2011
5
Weng H., Fang C., Fang Z., Andrei Bernevig B., and Dai X., “Weyl semimetal phase in noncentrosymmetric transition-metal monophosphides,” Physical Review X, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015
6
Huang S.-M., Xu S.-Y., Belopolski I., Lee C.-C., Chang G., Wang B., Alidoust N., Bian G., Neupane M., Zhang C., Jia S., Bansil A., Lin H., and Hasan M. Z., “A Weyl Fermion semimetal with surface Fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide TaAs class,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, 2015
7
Weng H., Yu R., Hu X., Dai X., and Fang Z., “Quantum anomalous Hall effect and related topological electronic states,” Advances in Physics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 227–282, 2015
8
Lv B., Weng H., Fu B., Wang X., Miao H., Ma J., Richard P., Huang X., Zhao L., Chen G., Fang Z., Dai X., Qian T., and Ding H., “Experimental Discovery of Weyl Semimetal TaAs,” Physical Review X, vol. 5, no. 3, 2015
9
Xu S.-Y., Belopolski I., Alidoust N., Neupane M., Bian G., Zhang C., Sankar R., Chang G., Yuan Z., Lee C.-C., Huang S.-M., Zheng H., Ma J., Sanchez D. S., Wang B., Bansil A., Chou F., Shibayev P. P., Lin H., Jia S., and Hasan M. Z., “Discovery of a Weyl fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs,” Science, vol. 349, no. 6248, pp. 613–617, 2015
10
Weng H., Dai X., and Fang Z., “Topological semimetals predicted from first-principles calculations,” Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 28, no. 30, p. 303001, 2016
11
Armitage N. P., Mele E. J., and Vishwanath A., “Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 90, no. 1, –015001, 57, 2018
12
Burkov A., “Weyl metals,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, vol. 9, pp. 359–378, 2018
13
Goldman N., Satija I., Nikolic P., Bermudez A., Martin-Delgado M. A., Lewenstein M., and Spielman I. B., “Realistic time-reversal invariant topological insulators with neutral atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 105, no. 25, 2010
14
Sun K., Liu W. V., Hemmerich A., and Das Sarma S., “Topological semimetal in a fermionic optical lattice,” Nature Physics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–70, 2012
15
Jotzu G., Messer M., Desbuquois R., Lebrat M., Uehlinger T., Greif D., and Esslinger T., “Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions,” Nature, vol. 515, no. 7526, pp. 237–240, 2014
16
Aidelsburger M., Lohse M., Schweizer C., Atala M., Barreiro J. T., Nascimbène S., Cooper N. R., Bloch I., and Goldman N., “Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms,” Nature Physics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 2015
17
Xu Y., Zhang F., and Zhang C., “Structured Weyl points in spin-orbit coupled fermionic superfluids,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, no. 26, 2015
18
Dubček T., Kennedy C. J., Lu L., Ketterle W., Soljačić M., and Buljan H., “Weyl points in three-dimensional optical lattices: synthetic magnetic monopoles in momentum space,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 22, 2015
19
Zhang D., Zhu S., and Wang Z. D., “Simulating and exploring Weyl semimetal physics with cold atoms in a two-dimensional optical lattice,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 92, no. 1, 2015
20
Chen W., Lu H., and Hou J., “Topological semimetals with a double-helix nodal link,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 96, no. 4, 2017
21
Bi R., Yan Z., Lu L., and Wang Z., “Nodal-knot semimetals,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 96, no. 20, 2017
22
Mai X., Zhang D., Li Z., and Zhu S., “Exploring topological double-Weyl semimetals with cold atoms in optical lattices,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 95, no. 6, 2017
23
Raghu S., and Haldane F. D. M., “Analogs of quantum-Hall-effect edge states in photonic crystals,” Physical Review A: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, vol. 78, 2008
24
Haldane F. D. M., and Raghu S., “Possible realization of directional optical waveguides in photonic crystals with broken time-reversal symmetry,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 1, –4, 2008
25
Lu L., Fu L., Joannopoulos J. D., and Soljacic M., “Weyl points and line nodes in gyroid photonic crystals,” Nature Photonics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 294–299, 2013
26
Lu L., Joannopoulos J. D., and Soljačić M., “Topological photonics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 821–829, 2014
27
Rechtsman M. C., Zeuner J. M., Plotnik Y., Lumer Y., Podolsky D., Dreisow F., Nolte S., Segev M., and Szameit A., “Photonic Floquet topological insulators,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7444, pp. 196–200, 2013
28
Yan Q., Liu R., Yan Z., Liu B., Chen H., Wang Z., and Lu L., “Experimental discovery of nodal chains,” Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 461–464, 2018
29
Ozawa T., Price H. M., Amo A., Goldman N., Hafezi M., Lu L., Rechtsman M., Schuster D., Simon J., Zilberberg O., and Carusotto I., “Topological Photonics,” , arXiv: 1802.04173, 2018.
30
Prodan E., and Prodan C., “Topological phonon modes and their role in dynamic instability of microtubules,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 24, 2009
31
Berg N., Joel K., Koolyk M., and Prodan E., “Topological phonon modes in filamentary structures,” Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, vol. 83, no. 2, 2011
32
Wang P., Lu L., and Bertoldi K., “Topological phononic crystals with one-way elastic edge waves,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, no. 10, 2015
33
Po H. C., Bahri Y., and Vishwanath A., “Phonon analog of topological nodal semimetals,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 93, no. 20, 2016
34
Xiao Y., Ma G., Zhang Z., and Chan C., “Topological subspace-induced bound state in the continuum,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 118, no. 16, 2017
35
Li F., Huang X., Lu J., Ma J., and Liu Z., “Weyl points and Fermi arcs in a chiral phononic crystal,” Nature Physics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 30–34, 2017
36
Zhang T., Song Z., Alexandradinata A., Weng H., Fang C., Lu L., and Fang Z., “Double-Weyl phonons in transition-metal monosilicides,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 120, 2018
37
Kane C. L., and Lubensky T. C., “Topological boundary modes in isostatic lattices,” Nature Physics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2013
38
Chen B. G., Upadhyaya N., and Vitelli V., “Nonlinear conduction via solitons in a topological mechanical insulator,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 36, pp. 13004–13009, 2014
39
Roman S., and Sebastian D. H., “Observation of phononic helical edge states in a mechanical topological insulator,” Science, vol. 349, no. 6243, pp. 47–50, 2015
40
Nash L. M., Kleckner D., Read A., Vitelli V., Turner A. M., and Irvine W. T. M., “Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials,” in Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, vol. 112, pp. 14495–14500
41
Paulose J., Chen B. G.-G., and Vitelli V., “Topological modes bound to dislocations in mechanical metamaterials,” Nature Physics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 153–156, 2015
42
Kariyado T., and Hatsugai Y., “Manipulation of dirac cones in mechanical graphene,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, 2015
43
Meeussen A. S., Paulose J., and Vitelli V., “Geared topological metamaterials with tunable mechanical stability,” Physical Review X, vol. 6, no. 4, 2016
44
Abbott B. P., Abbott R., and Abbott T. D., “Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 116, 2016
45
Süsstrunk R., and Huber S. D., “Classification of topological phonons in linear mechanical metamaterials,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 113, no. 33, pp. E4767–E4775, 2016
46
Coulais C., Sounas D., and Alù A., “Static non-reciprocity in mechanical metamaterials,” Nature, vol. 542, no. 7642, pp. 461–464, 2017
47
Xiong Z., Wang H., Ge H., Shi J., Luo J., Lai Y., Lu M., and Jiang J., “Topological node lines in mechanical metacrystals,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 97, no. 18, 2018
48
Ningyuan J., Owens C., Sommer A., Schuster D., and Simon J., “Time- and site-resolved dynamics in a topological circuit,” Physical Review X, vol. 5, no. 2, 2015
49
Albert V. V., Glazman L. I., and Jiang L., “Topological properties of linear circuit lattices,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 17, –6, 2015
50
Tymchenko M., and Alù A., “Circuit-based magnetless floquet topological insulator,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Advanced Electromagnetic Materials in Microwaves and Optics, METAMATERIALS 2016, Greece, September 2016, pp. 373–375
51
Lee C. H., Imhof S., Berger C., Bayer F., Brehm J., Molenkamp L. W., Kiessling T., and Thomale R., “Topolectrical circuits,” Communications Physics, vol. 1, no. 1, 2018
52
Goren T., Plekhanov K., Appas F., and Le Hur K., “Topological Zak phase in strongly coupled LC circuits,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 97, no. 4, 2018
53
Li Y., Sun Y., Zhu W., Guo Z., Jiang J., Kariyado T., Chen H., and Hu X., “Generating electromagnetic modes with fine tunable orbital angular momentum by planar topological circuits,” , arXiv:1801.04395, 2018.
54
Fang C., Weng H., Dai X., and Fang Z., “Topological nodal line semimetals,” Chinese Physics B, vol. 25, no. 11, p. 117106, 2016
55
Yu R., Fang Z., Dai X., and Weng H., “Topological nodal line semimetals predicted from first-principles calculations,” Frontiers of Physics, vol. 12, no. 3, 2017
56
Yang S.-Y., Yang H., Derunova E., Parkin S. S., Yan B., and Ali M. N., “Symmetry demanded topological nodal-line materials,” Advances in Physics: X, vol. 3, 2018
57
Chiu C., and Schnyder A. P., “Classification of reflection-symmetry-protected topological semimetals and nodal superconductors,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 90, no. 20, 2014
58
Bian G., Chang T.-R., Sankar R., Xu S.-Y., Zheng H., Neupert T., Chiu C.-K., Huang S.-M., Chang G., Belopolski I., Sanchez D. S., Neupane M., Alidoust N., Liu C., Wang B., Lee C.-C., Jeng H.-T., Zhang C., Yuan Z., Jia S., Bansil A., Chou F., Lin H., and Hasan M. Z., “Topological nodal-line fermions in spin-orbit metal PbTaSe2,” Nature Communications, vol. 7, 2016
59
Li R., Ma H., Cheng X., Wang S., Li D., Zhang Z., Li Y., and Chen X., “Dirac node lines in pure alkali earth metals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 117, no. 9, 2016
60
Yamakage A., Yamakawa Y., Tanaka Y., and Okamoto Y., “Line-node Dirac semimetal and topological insulating phase in noncentrosymmetric pnictides CaAgX (X = P, As),” Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 85, no. 1, 2016
61
Bian G., Chang T.-R., Zheng H., Velury S., Xu S.-Y., Neupert T., Chiu C.-K., Huang S.-M., Sanchez D. S., Belopolski I., Alidoust N., Chen P.-J., Chang G., Bansil A., Jeng H.-T., Lin H., and Hasan M. Z., “Drumhead surface states and topological nodal-line fermions in TlTaSe2,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 93, no. 12, 2016
62
Weng H., Liang Y., Xu Q., Yu R., Fang Z., Dai X., and Kawazoe Y., “Topological node-line semimetal in three-dimensional graphene networks,” Physical Review B, vol. 92, 2015
63
Kim Y., Wieder B. J., Kane C., and Rappe A. M., “Dirac line nodes in inversion-symmetric crystals,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, no. 3, 2015
64
Yu R., Weng H., Fang Z., Dai X., and Hu X., “Topological node-line semimetal and dirac semimetal state in antiperovskite,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 115, no. 3, 2015
65
Xie L. S., Schoop L. M., Seibel E. M., Gibson Q. D., Xie W., and Cava R. J., “A new form of Ca3P2 with a ring of Dirac nodes,” APL Materials, vol. 3, no. 8, 2015
66
Gómez-Ruiz F. J., Mendoza-Arenas J. J., Rodríguez F. J., Tejedor C., and Quiroga L., “Quantum phase transitions detected by a local probe using time correlations and violations of Leggett-Garg inequalities,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 93, no. 3, 2016
67
Zeng M., Fang C., Chang G., Chen Y.-A., Hsieh T., Bansil A., Lin H., and Fu L., “Topological semimetals and topological insulators in rare earth monopnictides,” , 2015, https://arxiv.org/abs/1504.03492.
68
Hirayama M., Okugawa R., Miyake T., and Murakami S., “Topological Dirac nodal lines and surface charges in fcc alkaline earth metals,” Nature Communications, vol. 8, 2017
69
Chen Y., Xie Y., Yang S. A., Pan H., Zhang F., Cohen M. L., and Zhang S., “Nanostructured carbon allotropes with Weyl-like loops and points,” Nano Letters, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 6974–6978, 2015
70
Huang H., Liu J., Vanderbilt D., and Duan W., “Topological nodal-line semimetals in alkaline-earth stannides, germanides, and silicides,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 93, no. 20, 2016
71
Du Y., Tang F., Wang D., Sheng L., Kan E., Duan C., Savrasov S. Y., and Wan X., “CaTe: a new topological node-line and Dirac semimetal,” npj Quantum Materials, vol. 2, no. 1, 2017
72
Xu Q., Yu R., Fang Z., Dai X., and Weng H., “Topological nodal line semimetals in the CaP3 family of materials,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 95, 2017
73
Fang C., Chen Y., Kee H., and Fu L., “Topological nodal line semimetals with and without spin-orbital coupling,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 92, no. 8, 2015
74
Bzdušek T., Wu Q., Rüegg A., Sigrist M., and Soluyanov A. A., “Nodal-chain metals,” Nature, vol. 538, no. 7623, pp. 75–78, 2016
75
Liang Q., Zhou J., Yu R., Wang Z., and Weng H., “Node-surface and node-line fermions from nonsymmorphic lattice symmetries,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 93, no. 8, 2016
76
Li S., Liu Y., Wang S., Yu Z., Guan S., Sheng X., Yao Y., and Yang S. A., “Nonsymmorphic-symmetry-protected hourglass Dirac loop, nodal line, and Dirac point in bulk and monolayer,” Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 97, no. 4, 2018
77
Nakata Y., Okada T., Nakanishi T., and Kitano M., “Circuit model for hybridization modes in metamaterials and its analogy to the quantum tight-binding model,” Physica Status Solidi (b) – Basic Solid State Physics, vol. 249, no. 11, pp. 2293–2302, 2012
Year 2018 volume 2018 Issue 9
PDF
53
28
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1155/2018/6793752
  • Receive Date:2018-05-12
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2018-09-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2018-05-12
  • Accepted:2018-07-21
Affiliations
    1School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
    2Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/research/EN/10.1155/2018/6793752
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT