PDF
Full
Outline
Natural rubber latex (NRL) is susceptible to spoilage, and current high ammonia preservation systems have serious contamination problems. In this study, NRL was preserved by thione derivative LS, and the preservation effect on NRL was investigated. The volatile fatty acid value (VFA No.) and viscosity value of LS-preserved fresh latex were relatively low, and the preservation effect of LS at 0.1% was better than that of 0.25% ammonia. LS-ammonia composite preservation was used to prepare low-ammonia concentrated natural rubber latex (CNRL), and CNRL could be preserved stably for 180 days by the dosage at 0.01%~0.05%. The preserved low-ammonia CNRL had low VFA No. and good stability, and all the indexes met the requirements of production. The stability of the preserved low ammonia CNRL was outstanding, and all the indexes met the current production application requirements. The LS-ammonia composite preserved low ammonia CNRL also had excellent physicochemical and film-forming properties, and the tensile strength and tear strength of the vulcanized film were generally better than those of the current high ammonia preserved CNRL vulcanized film. By infrared absorption spectroscopy, the structure of the preservative LS-ammonia composite preserved low ammonia CNRLvulcanized film did not change significantly; thermal analysis showed that the thermal stability of the vulcanized film was basically the same as that of the high ammonia CNRL film. In addition, the safety analysis showed that the LS-ammonia composite preserved low ammonia CNRL dry rubber film did not have potential toxic effects. There was no skin irritation reaction, and the safety was better. The preservative LS has excellent preservation effect on NRL, and the composite preservation preparation of low ammonia CNRL has good performance, which can be used in the production of a variety of pure rubber products, and at the same time, the low cost has a broad application prospect.
PDF
113
59
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
