收藏切换
Effects of Different Enclosure Netting Methods on Pesticide Degradation, Quality Characteristics and Economic Benefits of Cowpea
收藏切换
PDF
Guangtao XING1, 2, Qikai ZHANG3, 4, Hanyang ZHAO1, Yihong LI1, Shuchang WANG3, Wen XIE1, 5, Shengyong WU1, 2, **, Baoqian LYU3, 4, **
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(5) : 1259 - 1267
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(5): 1259-1267
Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety
Effects of Different Enclosure Netting Methods on Pesticide Degradation, Quality Characteristics and Economic Benefits of Cowpea
Full
Guangtao XING1, 2, Qikai ZHANG3, 4, Hanyang ZHAO1, Yihong LI1, Shuchang WANG3, Wen XIE1, 5, Shengyong WU1, 2, **, Baoqian LYU3, 4, **
Affiliations
  • 1.National Hainan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China
  • 2.Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
  • 3.Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
  • 4.Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in the Nanfan Area, Sanya, Hainan 572025, China
  • 5.Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Published: 2025-05-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.05.024
Outline
收藏切换

This study investigated the impact of different netting methods on the cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) industry. Specifically, it compared the degradation characteristics of three pesticides-matrine, spinosad, and difenoconazole-under two netting conditions (fully enclosed and semi-enclosed), the accumulation changes of pectin, cellulose, total phenols, and flavonoids, and analyzed the economic benefits of cowpea cultivation under the netting methods. The results indicated that under semi-enclosed netting conditions, the half-life of the pesticides was 1.13 days for matrine, 0.42 days for spinosad, and 1.96 days for difenoconazole. In contrast, under fully enclosed netting conditions, the half-life of the pesticides was 1.53 days, 0.83 days, and 2.51 days, respectively. Compared to fully enclosed netting, the degradation rate of the pesticides was significantly faster under semi-enclosed netting conditions. Regarding the accumulation of key substances, there was no significant difference in the contents of pectin [(15.88±2.025)mg/g] and cellulose [(1.75±0.128)mg/g] between semi-enclosed and fully enclosed conditions. However, total phenol content under semi-enclosed netting [(0.42±0.125)mg/g was 40.00% lower than that under fully enclosed netting [(0.70±0.091)mg/g], and flavonoid content [(6.08±2.509)mg/g] was 55.91% lower under semi-enclosed netting than under fully enclosed netting [(13.79±0.876)mg/g]. Economic analysis showed that considering field management, pest control investment, and market conditions, cowpea cultivation under fully enclosed netting yielded higher input and output compared to semi-enclosed netting. When the purchase price of cowpea reaches 5.11 yuan/kg (for fully enclosed netting) and 3.85 yuan/kg (for semi-enclosed netting), the profit and loss break even. This study would provide both theoretical and practical guidance for selecting appropriate netting methods for cowpea cultivation.

cowpea  /  insect-proof net  /  enclosure netting methods  /  pesticide residue  /  quality  /  economic benefits
Guangtao XING, Qikai ZHANG, Hanyang ZHAO, Yihong LI, Shuchang WANG, Wen XIE, Shengyong WU, Baoqian LYU. Effects of Different Enclosure Netting Methods on Pesticide Degradation, Quality Characteristics and Economic Benefits of Cowpea[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2025 , 46 (5) : 1259 -1267 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.05.024
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 5
PDF
93
46
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.05.024
  • Receive Date:2024-12-16
  • Online Date:2026-06-26
  • Published:2025-05-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-12-16
  • Accepted:2025-01-21
Funding
Affiliations
    1.National Hainan Research Institute (Sanya), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Sanya, Hainan 572024, China
    2.Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
    3.Environment and Plant Protection Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management of Tropical Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
    4.Sanya Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Hainan Key Laboratory for Biosafety Monitoring and Molecular Breeding in the Nanfan Area, Sanya, Hainan 572025, China
    5.Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.05.024
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT