收藏切换
Yield Prediction of Tropical Crops in Hainan Using Multiple Machine Learning Models
收藏切换
PDF
Yiwen MA1, 2, Xuan YU1, 2, *, Zhenyu LI1, 2, 3, Hailiang LI1, 2
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(9) : 2271 - 2286
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(9): 2271-2286
Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety
Yield Prediction of Tropical Crops in Hainan Using Multiple Machine Learning Models
Full
Yiwen MA1, 2, Xuan YU1, 2, *, Zhenyu LI1, 2, 3, Hailiang LI1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Applied Research on Tropical Crop Information Technology of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
  • 2.Hainan Tang Huajun Academician Workstation, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
  • 3.Hainan Land Science Society, Haikou, Hainan 571132, China
Published: 2025-09-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.09.024
Outline
收藏切换

The yield of tropical crops is highly sensitive to climate conditions, and accurately modeling the meteorological-driven mechanisms is crucial for improving tropical agricultural productivity and climate adaptability. This study systematically compared the prediction performance of six machine learning models, including LGBM, RF, XGBoost, AdaBoost, SVM and MLR based on natural rubber, mango, pineapple and banana in Hainan. The SHAP method was used to quantify the contribution and non-linear response characteristics of meteorological factors. The LGBM model demonstrated the best prediction performance, with an average R2 of 0.945 for the test set (the R2 of rubber, mango, pineapple and banana were 0.942, 0.902, 0.954 and 0.983, respectively), and average RMSE and MAE of 1.436 t/hm2 and 1.150 t/hm2, significantly outperforming the other models (the R2 of RF, XGBoost, AdaBoost, SVM, MLR were 0.773, 0.563, 0.589, 0.368 and 0.508, respectively). The meteorological-driven mechanisms exhibited significant crop-specific differences. Rubber yield was mainly driven by solar radiation (the contribution was 14.7%) and temperature factors (the contribution of monthly minimum temperature and monthly maximum temperature were 14.4% and 11.7%, respectively). Mango yield was highly sensitive to monthly maximum temperature (the contribution was 19.0%) and vapor pressure deficit (the contribution was 18.5%). Pineapple and banana yield were dominated by soil moisture (the contribution was 18.9%) and relative humidity (the contribution was 23.6%), respectively. Based on the findings, differentiated agronomic management recommendations for each crop type were proposed. This study demonstrates that machine learning, combined with explainability methods, can effectively elucidate the climate response mechanisms of tropical crops, providing theoretical support for regional agricultural precision management.

tropical crops  /  yield prediction  /  machine learning  /  meteorological factors  /  Hainan
Yiwen MA, Xuan YU, Zhenyu LI, Hailiang LI. Yield Prediction of Tropical Crops in Hainan Using Multiple Machine Learning Models[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2025 , 46 (9) : 2271 -2286 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.09.024
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 9
PDF
97
50
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.09.024
  • Receive Date:2025-04-01
  • Online Date:2026-03-07
  • Published:2025-09-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-04-01
  • Accepted:2025-05-16
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Applied Research on Tropical Crop Information Technology of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
    2.Hainan Tang Huajun Academician Workstation, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
    3.Hainan Land Science Society, Haikou, Hainan 571132, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.09.024
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT