收藏切换
Control Efficacy of Different Microbial Agent on Pepper Phytophthora Blight and Effects on Soil Bacterial Community
收藏切换
PDF
Gongfu DU1, Yong HUANG3, Daye HUANG2, Zhengping NI3, Xiaoliang LI1, Jiali PENG1, Weixia LIU1, Zhiqiang QI1, *
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(6) : 1214 - 1223
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(6): 1214-1223
Plant Protection & Bio-safety
Control Efficacy of Different Microbial Agent on Pepper Phytophthora Blight and Effects on Soil Bacterial Community
Full
Gongfu DU1, Yong HUANG3, Daye HUANG2, Zhengping NI3, Xiaoliang LI1, Jiali PENG1, Weixia LIU1, Zhiqiang QI1, *
Affiliations
  • 1.Tropical Crops Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Field Soil Scientific Research Station in Danzhou of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
  • 2.Hubei Biopesticide Engineering Research Center/National Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Wuhan, Hubei 430064, China
  • 3.Chengdu Tepu Biothch Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610097, China
Published: 2023-06-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.06.015
Outline
收藏切换

This paper aimed to clarify the effect of different microbial agents on pepper blight and the influence of rhizosphere soil bacterial community structure, and to provide a green prevention technical basis for reducing the occurrence of pepper blight. Six microbial agents, including Bacillus subtilis, Trichoderma harzianum, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Streptomyces enissocaesllis were selected as the main research objects to study the effects on the control of pepper blight and the bacterial community structure in rhizosphere soil under pot experiment by high-throughput sequencing. A1 (1×108 CFU/g of B. subtilis microcapsule) and A2 (1×108 CFU/g of T. harzianum water-dispersed granule) had the best control effect, and the control effect was 85.58% and 81.97%, respectively, and others the control effects of A3 (5×108 CFU/g Pseudomonas fluorescence granules). The best control effect of A4 (4×109 CFU/g S. enissocaesllis NBF715 powder), A5 (1×1010 CFU/g B. subtilis wettable powder), A6 (3×108 CFU/g T. harzianum wettable powder) and A7 (50% carbendazim wettable powder) was 47.17%, 49.12%, 30.60%, 39.86%, 25.83%, respectively. Based on the high-throughput sequencing analysis, the bacterial community composition of pepper rhizosphere soil at phylum level, different microbial agents increased the proportion of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidota, especially A1 and A2 significantly increased the richness of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes. At the family level, the richness of Chitinophagaceae, Steroidobacteriaceae and Micrococcaceaee were improved by microbial agent treatment, and significant difference was found between A1 and A2 treatments. The total number of bacterial OTUs and the number of unique bacterial OTUs in the rhizosphere soil of Capsicum treated with A1, A2, A7, A8 (treatment of inoculated P. capsici) and CK (water) were analyzed by Venn diagram. The total number of bacterial OTUs and the number of unique dominant bacteria in the rhizosphere soil of capsicum increased in the A1 and A2 treatments, while the richness and diversity of soil bacteria decreased in the A7 treatment. In conclusion, the control effect of A1 and A2 on pepper blight was more than 80%, and the richness and diversity of unique dominant bacteria in the rhizosphere soil of pepper increased, and the ability of pepper to resist P. capsici infection was enhanced. A1 and A2 could be used as agents to control pepper Phytophthora blight. At the same time, the use of carbendazim reduced the richness and diversity of soil bacteria, and the pathogen could invade the root of pepper more quickly after the reduction of microbial diversity.

microbial agent  /  pepper blight  /  control effect  /  soil bacterial community
Gongfu DU, Yong HUANG, Daye HUANG, Zhengping NI, Xiaoliang LI, Jiali PENG, Weixia LIU, Zhiqiang QI. Control Efficacy of Different Microbial Agent on Pepper Phytophthora Blight and Effects on Soil Bacterial Community[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2023 , 44 (6) : 1214 -1223 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.06.015
Year 2023 volume 44 Issue 6
PDF
40
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.06.015
  • Receive Date:2022-09-02
  • Online Date:2026-03-05
  • Published:2023-06-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-09-02
  • Revised:2022-09-28
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Tropical Crops Germplasm Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Field Soil Scientific Research Station in Danzhou of Hainan Province, Haikou, Hainan 571101, China
    2.Hubei Biopesticide Engineering Research Center/National Biopesticide Engineering Research Center, Wuhan, Hubei 430064, China
    3.Chengdu Tepu Biothch Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 610097, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.06.015
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT