收藏切换
Difference of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Yield in Different Cassava Varieties and Leaves Remained Treatments
收藏切换
PDF
Hongxin LIN, Zhihua ZHANG, Fengjuan LYU, Ruiqing WANG, Rujie LYU, Yunping XIAO, Zhanqi YUAN
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(12) : 2437 - 2448
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(12): 2437-2448
Special Focus: Resources and Utilization of Cassava
Difference of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Yield in Different Cassava Varieties and Leaves Remained Treatments
Full
Hongxin LIN, Zhihua ZHANG, Fengjuan LYU, Ruiqing WANG, Rujie LYU, Yunping XIAO, Zhanqi YUAN
Affiliations
  • Soil and Fertilizer & Resources and Environment Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Red Soil/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System for the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affaurs, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330200, China
Published: 2023-12-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.12.009
Outline
收藏切换

Using compact varieties SC205, GR4 and umbrella varieties SC12, SC15 as the experimental materials, five treatments of 9, 36, 63, 90 leaves remained and no leaves removed were designed to study the differences of chlorophyll fluorescence and fresh tuber root yield to clarify the differences of chlorophyll fluorescence of functional leaves in different growth stages and leaves remained treatments and the effects of leaves number on fresh tuber root yield. The results showed that with the increase of leaves, the fresh tuber root yield increased, and the tuber root number, the fresh weight of stems and leaves and the harvest index increased first and then decreased. The average of tuber root yield per plant of 9, 36, 63, 90 and no leaf removed treatments was 0.94 kg, 2.22 kg, 2.65 kg, 2.91 kg and 3.35 kg, respectively. The maximum fluorescence yield (Fm) and maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) of compact varieties were higher than those of umbrella varieties. Fm and Fv/Fm of compact varieties was 0.885 and 0.739, respectively, and those of umbrella varieties was 0.838 and 0.707, respectively. The minimum fluorescence yield (F0) of compact type was smaller than that of umbrella type, and that for the two plant type varieties was 0.219 and 0.231, respectively. F0, Fm, Fv/Fm, ETR and Y(Ⅱ) decreased with the progress of leaf removed. With the increase of PAR, ETR increased gradually, and Y(Ⅱ) decreased sharply first and then slowly. The variation trend of chlorophyll fluorescence of cassava varieties with different plant types was the same, but the variation rule of different leaves was different. The ETR and Y(Ⅱ) of cassava functional leaves increased slightly when the number of leaves remained was small.

cassava  /  varieties  /  remained leaf number  /  yield  /  chlorophyll fluorescence
Hongxin LIN, Zhihua ZHANG, Fengjuan LYU, Ruiqing WANG, Rujie LYU, Yunping XIAO, Zhanqi YUAN. Difference of Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Yield in Different Cassava Varieties and Leaves Remained Treatments[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2023 , 44 (12) : 2437 -2448 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.12.009
Year 2023 volume 44 Issue 12
PDF
38
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.12.009
  • Receive Date:2022-08-02
  • Online Date:2026-03-05
  • Published:2023-12-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-08-02
  • Revised:2022-10-12
Funding
Affiliations
    Soil and Fertilizer & Resources and Environment Institute, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering and Technology Research Center for Red Soil/Key Laboratory of Crop Ecophysiology and Farming System for the Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affaurs, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330200, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.12.009
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT