收藏切换
Effects of Different Light Filter Bags on Sunburn and Fruit Quality of Pomegranate Fruit
收藏切换
PDF
Gaihua QIN, Botao JIA, Ying SU, Chunyan LIU, Jiyu LI, Zhen CAO, Zhi YANG, Qing YU
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(8) : 1704 - 1712
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(8): 1704-1712
Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety
Effects of Different Light Filter Bags on Sunburn and Fruit Quality of Pomegranate Fruit
Full
Gaihua QIN, Botao JIA, Ying SU, Chunyan LIU, Jiyu LI, Zhen CAO, Zhi YANG, Qing YU
Affiliations
  • Institute of Horticulture Research, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization (Co-construction by Ministry and Province)/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement and Eco-physiology of Anhui Province/Key Laboratory of Fruit Quality and Developmental Biology of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
Published: 2023-08-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.08.021
Outline
收藏切换

Five different light filter bags including red, green, blue, white and double kraft bag were selected to study the effects of different color filter bags on the sunburn incidence and fruit quality of pomegranate. The sunburn index of pomegranate fruit decreased from 62.42% to 100%, comparing to non-bagged fruits. Principal component analysis showed that bagging mainly affected four quality indicators of pomegranate fruit, including titratable acid, soluble solids content, soluble sugar and seed hardness. The content of soluble sugar increased by 26.72% in the red bag, the seed hardness decreased by 35.58%, and the SSC and titratable acidity did not change significantly. The content of titratable acid, SSC and soluble sugar in the green bag fruit increased by 5.80%, 7.03%, 15.40% respectively, seed hardness decreased by 56.30%. The content of titratable acid, SSC and soluble sugar in the blue bag increased by 11.59%, 9.38%, 23.55%, and the seed hardness decreased by 16.26%. Titratable acid, SSC of fruits and seed hardness in the white bag decreased by 17.39%, 2.89% and 35.63%, respectively. The titratable acid and soluble solids of the fruits in the kraft bag increased by 8.70% and 11.17%, respectively, and the seed hardness decreased by 38.91%. The comprehensive analysis of the sunburn incidence and the internal and external quality of the fruit found that the red bag significantly improved the appearance quality of the fruit, reduced the fruit sunburn index by 91.80%, significantly increased the soluble sugar content, and reduced the seed hardness. Therefore, the red bag is an ideal fruit bag for Hongyushizi.

pomegranate  /  bagging  /  sunburn  /  fruit quality  /  principal component analysis
Gaihua QIN, Botao JIA, Ying SU, Chunyan LIU, Jiyu LI, Zhen CAO, Zhi YANG, Qing YU. Effects of Different Light Filter Bags on Sunburn and Fruit Quality of Pomegranate Fruit[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2023 , 44 (8) : 1704 -1712 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.08.021
Year 2023 volume 44 Issue 8
PDF
37
8
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.08.021
  • Receive Date:2022-05-17
  • Online Date:2026-03-05
  • Published:2023-08-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-05-17
  • Revised:2022-08-15
Funding
Affiliations
    Institute of Horticulture Research, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Germplasm Innovation and Utilization (Co-construction by Ministry and Province)/Key Laboratory of Horticultural Crop Genetic Improvement and Eco-physiology of Anhui Province/Key Laboratory of Fruit Quality and Developmental Biology of Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230001, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.08.021
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT