收藏切换
Comparative Analysis on Feed Nutritive Value of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius and Hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera
收藏切换
PDF
Guo LIU, Xiuhua SHANG, Peijian ZHANG, Liqiong GAO, Yan PENG*
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(2) : 419 - 428
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2023, 44(2): 419-428
Post-harvest Treatment & Quality Safety
Comparative Analysis on Feed Nutritive Value of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius and Hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera
Full
Guo LIU, Xiuhua SHANG, Peijian ZHANG, Liqiong GAO, Yan PENG*
Affiliations
  • Research Institute of Fast-growing Trees, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524022, China
Published: 2023-02-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.02.021
Outline
收藏切换

The supply and demand of feed resources in China appear the phenomenon of lack of concentrate feed, protein feed, green feed and insufficient total resources, especially the serious shortage of protein feed. Cnidoscolus aconitifolius and hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera, as two new and high quality woody protein feed resources, have high potential for feed production. In this study, C. aconitifolius and hybrid B. papyrifera were taken as the experimental objects to determine the conventional nutrutional components, mineral elements and amino acid components. The comparison results were performed by t test and the feeding values of the two woody fodder plants were evaluated combined with relative feed value (RFV). The results of analysis showed that the crude protein (CP) content of C. aconitifolius and hybrid B. papyrifera was more than 20%, the crude fiber (CF) content was less than 15%, the mineral element content such as Ca, P, K, Mg, Fe and Zn was high. Among them, the Ca/P ratio of C. aconitifolius was 1.82∶1, which met the requirement of Ca/P ratio in general feed, while the Ca/P ratio of hybrid B. papyrifera was 8∶1, which was far greater than that in general feed. The essential amino acids (EAA)/non-essential amino acids (NEAA) and essential amino acids (EAA)/total amino acids (TAA) in both C. aconitifolius and hybrid B. papyrifera was above 60% and 40%, respectively. The variety of limiting amino acid (LAA) and sulfur-containing amino acids was comprehensive and rich in content. The evaluation results of C. aconitifolius and hybrid B. papyrifera combined with the relative feed value (RFV) showed that C. aconitifolius was super grade forage material and hybrid B. papyrifera was senior grade forage material, both had good overall effect and high feeding value. The results of comparative analysis on nutritional value of C. aconitifolius and hybrid B. papyrifera showed that both belonged to high-quality woody feed raw materials rich in protein, minerals and amino acids, had high feeding value and development potential in livestock diets. In particular, C. aconitifolius had higher CP content, lower CF content, lower NDF content and more reasonable proportion of calcium-phosphorus ratio, which had better feeding value compared with hybrid B. papyrifera.

Cnidoscolus aconitifolius  /  hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera  /  feed nutritive value  /  calcium-phosphorus ratio  /  limiting amino acid
Guo LIU, Xiuhua SHANG, Peijian ZHANG, Liqiong GAO, Yan PENG. Comparative Analysis on Feed Nutritive Value of Cnidoscolus aconitifolius and Hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2023 , 44 (2) : 419 -428 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.02.021
Year 2023 volume 44 Issue 2
PDF
35
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.02.021
  • Receive Date:2022-06-07
  • Online Date:2026-03-05
  • Published:2023-02-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-06-07
  • Revised:2022-07-17
Funding
Affiliations
    Research Institute of Fast-growing Trees, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524022, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2023.02.021
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT