收藏切换
Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Packages on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Honey Pomelo under Water and Fertilizer Integration Mode
收藏切换
PDF
Qing ZHANG1, Qingbo KONG1, *, Fangliang LI1, Huangwei HUANG2
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(1) : 123 - 134
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops | 2025, 46(1): 123-134
Plant Cultivation, Physiology & Biochemistry
Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Packages on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Honey Pomelo under Water and Fertilizer Integration Mode
Full
Qing ZHANG1, Qingbo KONG1, *, Fangliang LI1, Huangwei HUANG2
Affiliations
  • 1.Institute of Resources, Environment and Soil Fertilizer, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China
  • 2.Pinghe County Soil, Fertilizer, Ecological and Energy Station, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363700, China
Published: 2025-01-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.01.013
Outline
收藏切换

The study investigated the effects of different water and fertilizer combinations on yield, quality, and economic benefits of pomelo under the condition of water and fertilizer integration to provide a basis for exploring and practicing the integrated fertilization model of water and fertilizer for pomelo through a 3-year fixed position experiment. Four treatment methods were set up for Pinghe honey pomelo yield orchard: conventional fertilization (TF), 30% water and fertilizer package (30%WF), 50% water and fertilizer package (50%WF), and 70% water and fertilizer package (70%WF). The results showed that the effect of different degrees of reduced fertilization with a water-soluble fertilizer package on the yield of pomelo was significant. The average yield was as follows: 70%W>50%WF>TF>30%WF. The average 3-year yield increase rate of 50%WF, and 70%WF treatments in high-yield orchards was 12.43%, and 24.67%, respectively, compared to TF treatment. The average annual yield increase rate of 50%WF, and 70%WF treatments in low yield orchards compared to TF treatments was 15.05%, and 26.80%, respectively. The average 3-year yield of honey pomelo in high-yield and low yield orchards was the highest in the 70%WF treatment (high-yield orchards 67 845.5 kg/hm2, low yield orchards 53 495.5 kg/hm2), and the yield increase in low yield orchards was greater than that in high yield orchards. 70%WF had the best 3-year average secondary fruit rate in both high and low yield orchards (5.71% in high yield orchards and 4.67% in low yield orchards). The application of different water-soluble fertilizer combinations in high-yield and low yield orchards had no significant effect on the granulation rate of pomelo flesh, but had a more significant impact on single fruit weight and flesh weight. Moreover, there was a significant interannual variation in the cracking rate of honey pomelo treated with different water-soluble fertilizer combinations. The 70% water-soluble fertilizer package significantly improved the basic agronomic traits of pomelo, increased single fruit weight, and reduced fruit cracking rate. The increase and decrease in soluble solids, soluble sugars, and titratable acidity of the four treatments in high-yield and low yield orchards after 2 years were not significant, and there was no significant difference among the treatments. The 70% water-soluble fertilizer package had the best quality indicators for honey pomelo. The 3-year average final net income of high-yield orchards treated with 50%WF, and 70%WF increased by 30.58%, and 47.79% compared to the TF treatment, respectively. The 3-year average production to investment ratio was the highest in the 70%WF treatment (4.29∶1), which is 1.31 times higher than that of the TF treatment. The 3-year average final net income of low yield parks treated with 50%WF, and 70%WF increased by 40.41%, and 59.67% compared to the TF treatment, respectively. The 3-year average production to investment ratio was the highest in the 70%WF treatment (3.63∶1), which is 1.17 times higher than that of the TF treatment. The 70% water-soluble fertilizer package treatment had the highest economic benefits in both high and low yield orchards, with the economic benefits of low yield orchards increasing more than those of high yield orchards. Under the integrated mode of water and fertilizer, different water and fertilizer combinations with reduced fertilization had the effect of increasing the yield and economic benefits, improving the quality of honey pomelo, and the application of 70%WF treatment in high and low yield orchards had the best effect on improving the yield and economic benefits, and improving the quality of honey pomelo. This is the best fertilization treatment and is recommended for application.

reduced fertilization  /  honey pomelo  /  quality  /  economic performance  /  integration of water and fertilizer
Qing ZHANG, Qingbo KONG, Fangliang LI, Huangwei HUANG. Effects of Different Water and Fertilizer Packages on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Honey Pomelo under Water and Fertilizer Integration Mode[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2025 , 46 (1) : 123 -134 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.01.013
Year 2025 volume 46 Issue 1
PDF
61
29
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.01.013
  • Receive Date:2024-07-08
  • Online Date:2026-06-24
  • Published:2025-01-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-07-08
  • Revised:2024-08-24
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Institute of Resources, Environment and Soil Fertilizer, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China
    2.Pinghe County Soil, Fertilizer, Ecological and Energy Station, Zhangzhou, Fujian 363700, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/rdzwxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2025.01.013
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT