PDF
Full
Outline
In the process of electrification and intellectualization of the automobile industry，the automotive safety testing and evaluation technology has also been extended and expanded from simple passive safety to active and passive safety integration. In this paper，the differences between the world's mainstream automotive safety assessment procedures are compared and analyzed from three aspects： occupant protection in the vehicle，vulnerable road user protection outside the vehicle，and active safety. The key technical points of vehicle safety development for each evaluation condition are summarized and the development trend of safety evaluation procedures for new energy and intelligent networked vehicles is discussed. The research concludes that the mainstream automotive safety evaluation procedures are becoming more and more stringent in passive safety evaluation，with the proportion of active safety evaluation conditions gradually increasing，and the development focus of the future evaluation procedures will focus on the integration of active and passive safety and virtual evaluation for complex working conditions. In addition，the battery safety test for new energy vehicles has been relatively perfect，and the future research focus can be expanded to the direction of electronic control system testing，chassis stability testing，and unified standardization certification of charging and swapping facilities and supporting equipment. In the medium and long term，the construction of reasonable and reliable evaluation methods such as OTA （over the air） testing of intelligent networked vehicles and HMI （human machine interface） safety and comfort will become a major difficulty concerned by the industry，and a composite evaluation system combining the virtual and reality can be built with the help of tools such as autonomous driving simulators.
PDF
428
189
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
