收藏切换
Research on Safety Argumentation Method for Automated Driving Operational Mode Transitions
收藏切换
Juntao Chen1, Zhen Chen2, Qiang Yang3, Xiangcheng Wu4
Automotive Digest | 2026, (8) : 16 - 26
Less
收藏切换
Automotive Digest | 2026, (8): 16-26
• Special Topic on Security Verification and Evaluation of Intelligent Connected Vehicles •
Research on Safety Argumentation Method for Automated Driving Operational Mode Transitions
Full
Juntao Chen1, Zhen Chen2, Qiang Yang3, Xiangcheng Wu4
Affiliations
  • 1.Beijing Voyager Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080
  • 2.Beijing Dishi Data Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176
  • 3.Beijing Saimo Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080
  • 4.Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Equipment Industry Development Center, Beijing 100846
Published: 2026-08-05 doi: 10.19822/j.cnki.1671-6329.20260007
Outline
收藏切换

To address safety challenges arising from dynamic variations in operational capability boundaries, shifts in driving responsibility, and the activation of risk mitigation strategies in automated driving systems under multiple operational modes, this paper proposes a safety argumentation method for operational mode transitions. The method constructs a three-layer finite state machine model of"operational mode-operational state-behavioral response"to formally describe multi-mode operation and transition logic. Furthermore, a three-dimensional verification model of"state machine path, scenario type, safety evidence chain" is proposed to systematically link regulatory safety requirements with engineering design, testing and validation activities, and safety evidence. Typical scenarios are used to demonstrate the complete process from safety requirement decomposition and model construction to validation implementation and safety argumentation, providing an engineering reference for the safety design, regulatory review, and compliance decision-making of multi-mode automated driving systems.

Automated driving  /  Compliance assessment  /  Operational mode transition  /  Safety validation  /  Safety argumentation
陈俊涛, 陈贞, 杨强, 武湘成. 自动驾驶运行模式转换的安全论证方法研究. 汽车文摘, 2026 , (8) : 16 -26 . DOI: 10.19822/j.cnki.1671-6329.20260007
Juntao Chen, Zhen Chen, Qiang Yang, Xiangcheng Wu. Research on Safety Argumentation Method for Automated Driving Operational Mode Transitions[J]. Automotive Digest, 2026 , (8) : 16 -26 . DOI: 10.19822/j.cnki.1671-6329.20260007
Year 2026 volume Issue 8
178
23
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19822/j.cnki.1671-6329.20260007
  • Online Date:2026-09-23
  • Published:2026-08-05
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Funding
Affiliations
    1.Beijing Voyager Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080
    2.Beijing Dishi Data Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100176
    3.Beijing Saimo Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100080
    4.Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Equipment Industry Development Center, Beijing 100846
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/qcwz/EN/10.19822/j.cnki.1671-6329.20260007
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT