收藏切换
Fracture Analysis and Rectification of Trunk Lid Torsion Bar Spring
收藏切换
PDF
Liang Min
Automobile Technology & Material | 2024, (3) : 47 - 51
Less
收藏切换
Automobile Technology & Material | 2024, (3): 47-51
Fracture Analysis and Rectification of Trunk Lid Torsion Bar Spring
Full
Liang Min
Affiliations
  • SAIC Motor Passenger Vehicle Company, Shanghai 201804
Published: 2024-03-20 doi: 10.19710/J.cnki.1003-8817.20220233
Outline
收藏切换

In order to determine the fracture mechanism and cause of the trunk lid torsion bar spring, the fracture morphology, composition, size, material strength, microstructure and residual stress were tested, and a comprehensive analysis was conducted in combination with background information. The results indicate that the torsion bar spring of the trunk lid experienced high-strength steel delayed cracking at the concentrated bending stress caused by high material strength, insufficient tempering, and high residual stress. Based on the cause of cracking, improvements were made from two aspects: controlling the strength of raw materials and optimizing the stress relief tempering process to reduce residual stress, and ultimately the delayed cracking failure of the luggage torsion bar spring was effectively solved.

Torsion bar spring  /  Delayed fracture  /  Residual stress  /  Stress relief tempering
Liang Min. Fracture Analysis and Rectification of Trunk Lid Torsion Bar Spring[J]. Automobile Technology & Material, 2024 , (3) : 47 -51 . DOI: 10.19710/J.cnki.1003-8817.20220233
Year 2024 volume Issue 3
PDF
219
96
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19710/J.cnki.1003-8817.20220233
  • Online Date:2025-12-22
  • Published:2024-03-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations
    SAIC Motor Passenger Vehicle Company, Shanghai 201804
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/qcgyycl/EN/10.19710/J.cnki.1003-8817.20220233
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT