收藏切换
Drive Wheel Slip Rate Detection Method and Experiment for Tractor Based on Multi-sensor Data Fusion
收藏切换
Shuo ZHANG, Yanqing LUO, Jingming WEN, Yu CHEN, Handong GONG, Jun CHEN
Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery | 2025, 56(12) : 190 - 200
Less
收藏切换
Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery | 2025, 56(12): 190-200
• Special Column of Key Technologies for Intelligent Agricultural Power Equipment •
Drive Wheel Slip Rate Detection Method and Experiment for Tractor Based on Multi-sensor Data Fusion
Full
Shuo ZHANG, Yanqing LUO, Jingming WEN, Yu CHEN, Handong GONG, Jun CHEN
Affiliations
  • College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Published: 2025-12-25 doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.12.017
Outline
收藏切换

Accurate detection of the drive wheel slip in tractor ploughing operations is fundamental to achieving slip control, which helps improve the traction efficiency and ploughing quality of a tractor. To address the issue of ensuring the accuracy and real-time performance of slip rate detection under heavy load ploughing conditions, a slip rate detection method based on multisensor data fusion was proposed. A real-time data collection platform for tractor ploughing operations was established. Field experiments were conducted to obtain tillage speed, forward acceleration, tractor pitch angle, roll angle, traction resistance, tillage depth and corresponding slip rate under different operating conditions. A datasets was constructed and subjected to statistical analysis. Four machine learning algorithms—random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR), radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), and artificial neural network (ANN)—were employed to construct the slip rate detection models. The hyperparameters of these models were optimized by using grid search and particle swarm optimization (PSO). The performance of the models was evaluated via three metrics: the coefficient of determination (R2), the root mean square error (RMSE), and the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The results indicated that, except for the RF model, which exhibited overfitting, the other three models achieved satisfactory slip rate predictions (R2>0.9). Among them, the ANN model optimized with particle swarm optimization (PSO) for initial threshold weight optimization outperformed both the SVR model with an R2 of 0.918, an RMSE of 2.6% and a MAPE of 8.9%, and the RBFNN model with an R2 of 0.903, an RMSE of 3.0%, and a MAPE of 8.8% on the test dataset, achieving an R2 of 0.937, an RMSE of 1.0%, and a MAPE of 7.6%. This method enabled reliable and accurate detection of tractor drive wheel slip rate, offering an approach for precise online detection and control of slip rate.

tractor  /  ploughing operation  /  sliprate  /  multi-sensor datafusion  /  hyperparameter optimization
张硕, 罗岩青, 温景明, 陈雨, 弓寒冬, 陈军. 基于多传感器数据融合的拖拉机驱动轮滑转率检测方法与试验. 农业机械学报, 2025 , 56 (12) : 190 -200 . DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.12.017
Shuo ZHANG, Yanqing LUO, Jingming WEN, Yu CHEN, Handong GONG, Jun CHEN. Drive Wheel Slip Rate Detection Method and Experiment for Tractor Based on Multi-sensor Data Fusion[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2025 , 56 (12) : 190 -200 . DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.12.017
Year 2025 volume 56 Issue 12
231
101
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.12.017
  • Receive Date:2025-03-06
  • Online Date:2026-09-30
  • Published:2025-12-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-06
  • Revised:2025-04-07
Funding
Affiliations
    College of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/nyjxxb/EN/10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2025.12.017
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT