At present, most of the developed fluorescent probes focus on active small molecules (e.g., HClO, ONOO
−, Cys), whereas those suitable for other substances such as metal ions and enzymes are scarce. Based on the current applications of fluorescent probes in RA research, we outline several possible directions for future research on fluorescent probes for RA diagnosis and treatment: (1) NIR or two-photon probes. NIR probes, particularly NIR-Ⅱ and two-photon ones, are well suited for biological imaging because of the high permeability of tissues to low-energy light. The development of activatable NIR-Ⅰ and NIR-Ⅱ probes could provide more realistic information on active species (biomarkers) in deep animal tissues[
83,
115]. In particular, NIR-Ⅱ probes hold great promise for clinical applications in humans, which are currently scarce. (2) Fluorescent probes with ultrahigh sensitivity and specificity. Although these fluorescent probes have been used for specific imaging in living organisms, most of them are only used to image living cells, tissues, or mice that produce biomarkers when stimulated with chemicals such as LPS. Many probes with low LODs have been reported for the detection of HClO or ONOO
− but are still poorly suited for early-stage arthritis monitoring[
58,
66,
87,
92]. In addition, the currently reported C=C bonds can be broken not only by HClO, but also by ONOO
−[
62,
63,
116]. The internal environment of an organism is complex and variable, and the presence of certain species may interfere with the application of these probes. Thus, methods for the
in situ real-time imaging of disease-specific markers and, hence, for the early diagnosis of RA, are highly sought after. (3) Fluorescent probes for the simultaneous detection of multiple markers. In general, disease development occurs through the participation of multiple species. The study of single species only may suffer from the presence of other interfering species or structural bias–inducing false positive signals. Therefore, probes capable of detecting multiple markers simultaneously are required. Gao
et al.[
117] designed pH- and β-galactosidase-responsive fluorescent probes to accurately track senescence and avoid other sources of interference. However, reports on the simultaneous detection of multiple RA markers using fluorescent probes are scarce. In the case of the simultaneous detection of multiple species, their synergistic effects can be clarified to shed light on the etiology and pathogenesis of RA and promote RA treatment. (4) Super-resolution fluorescent probes. The widespread application of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy helps to obtain more accurate information. Chai
et al.[
118] visualized the cellular-level distribution of enzymes at an unprecedented nanoscale using a super-resolution probe. The combination of super-resolution microscopy with fluorescent probes allows a comprehensive understanding of the relevant physiological or pathological processes involved. (5) Development of multimodal fluorescent probes. Single techniques often have certain limitations, while the combination of multiple techniques can improve detection accuracy. For example, developments in photoacoustic imaging, photothermal therapy, and other technologies have facilitated favorable therapeutic integration. Li
et al.[
119] developed a multimodal activatable imaging probe for the
in vivo fluorescent photoacoustic and radioactive signal imaging of biomarkers related to prostate cancer diagnosis and prognosis (i.e., liver proteases and prostate-specific membrane antigens) and thus paved the way for the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, the use of such probes in RA studies has rarely been reported. We believe that the simultaneous detection of multiple markers and the combined use of multiple techniques could facilitate the early detection of RA.