收藏切换
Study on separation performance of integrated wellhead sand and liquid removal device for compressed air energy storage
收藏切换
Shiying LIANG1, Yan WANG2, Xinhao LI3, Zongxing WANG2, Yuchun SHI2, Liyun ZHU3, Zhenbo WANG3
Fluid Machinery | 2026, 54(6) : 33 - 41
Less
收藏切换
Fluid Machinery | 2026, 54(6): 33-41
Study on separation performance of integrated wellhead sand and liquid removal device for compressed air energy storage
Full
Shiying LIANG1, Yan WANG2, Xinhao LI3, Zongxing WANG2, Yuchun SHI2, Liyun ZHU3, Zhenbo WANG3
Affiliations
  • 1Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute,Dongying 257026,China
  • 2Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Corporation,Dongying 257026,China
  • 3College of New Energy,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao 266580,China
Published: 2026-06-30 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.06.005
Outline
收藏切换

Based on the issues of low separation accuracy and high pressure drop in existing deep purification processes for produced compressed air,this study proposes an integrated wellhead sand and liquid removal device for compressed air energy storage applications,which couples multiple separation mechanisms including sedimentation,wet capture,and filtration.The effects of gas flow rate,inlet sand concentration,inlet liquid concentration,and sand particle size on separation performance were systematically investigated.The results indicate that as gas flow rate and inlet sand concentration increase,both sand and liquid removal efficiencies first rise and then decline,while pressure drop increases;the maximum sand and liquid removal efficiencies reach 99.92% and 99.96%,respectively,with a minimum pressure drop of 0.46 kPa.As inlet liquid concentration increases,sand removal efficiency first increases and then decreases,liquid removal efficiency increases,and pressure drop rises;the maximum sand and liquid removal efficiencies are 99.90% and 99.98%,respectively,with a minimum pressure drop of 1.03 kPa.When treating sand particles with larger diameters,the device achieves higher sand and liquid removal efficiencies and a lower pressure drop.Under all tested conditions,liquid removal efficiency exceeds 99.53%,sand removal efficiency exceeds 99.74%,and pressure drop remains below 6.72 kPa.The separation efficiencies for particles of 5 μm and 10 μm are higher than 97.27% and 99.01%,respectively.The recommended operating conditions are gas flow rates of 165~240 m³/h,inlet sand concentrations of 0.45~0.9 kg/m³,and inlet liquid concentrations of 1.3~7 kg/m³,within which the device maintains high sand and liquid removal efficiencies and relatively low pressure loss.The proposed integrated wellhead sand and liquid removal device can effectively remove sand particles and liquid droplets entrained in compressed air,thereby ensuring operational safety for downstream energy conversion equipment and providing a technical reference for air purification in compressed air energy storage systems utilizing abandoned oil and gas reservoirs.

compressed air energy storage  /  three‑phase separation  /  cyclone separator  /  sand and liquid removal  /  separation performance
梁世英, 王燕, 李昕昊, 王宗兴, 石玉春, 朱丽云, 王振波. 压缩空气储能用井口除砂除液一体化装置分离性能研究. 流体机械, 2026 , 54 (6) : 33 -41 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.06.005
Shiying LIANG, Yan WANG, Xinhao LI, Zongxing WANG, Yuchun SHI, Liyun ZHU, Zhenbo WANG. Study on separation performance of integrated wellhead sand and liquid removal device for compressed air energy storage[J]. Fluid Machinery, 2026 , 54 (6) : 33 -41 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.06.005
Year 2026 volume 54 Issue 6
66
20
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.06.005
  • Receive Date:2025-11-18
  • Online Date:2026-10-22
  • Published:2026-06-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-11-18
Affiliations
    1Sinopec Shengli Oilfield Petroleum Engineering Technology Research Institute,Dongying 257026,China
    2Sinopec Petroleum Engineering Corporation,Dongying 257026,China
    3College of New Energy,China University of Petroleum(East China),Qingdao 266580,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ltjx/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1005-0329.2026.06.005
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT