Full
Outline
To analyze clinical characteristics affecting survival outcomes in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients with second primary malignancies (SPM) and construct a predictive model with a web-based calculator.
Patients diagnosed with GAC between January 2010 and December 2017 in the SEER database (n=24 085) were analyzed, comparing non-SPM (n=22 963) and SPM cohorts (n=1 122). SPM patients were randomized (3:1) into training (n=842) and internal validation cohorts (n=280). Univariate/multivariate Cox regression identified prognostic factors for model construction. Model performance was evaluated via ROC curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). A web-based calculator was deployed using DynNom (https://kunma697.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp-1/). External validation used 192 SPM patients diagnosed at Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital (2010-2017).
χ² tests revealed SPM patients had higher age (56.3%), earlier T-stage (T1:29.2%; T2:10.5%), predominant gastric cardia involvement (43.7%), fewer distant metastases (12.3%), and higher rates of radiotherapy (32.5%) and surgery (77.2%) vs. non-SPM (P<0.05). Cox analyses identified GAC primary site, T-stage, SEER stage, radiotherapy/surgery history, plus SPM grade/stage/treatment history as significant predictors (P<0.05). AUCs in the training cohort were 0.771 (95%CI:0.722~0.820), 0.839 (95%CI:0.796~0.882), and 0.836 (95%CI: 0.792~0.879) for 1-/3-/5-year survival; internal validation showed 0.751 (95%CI: 0.700~0.801), 0.746 (95%CI: 0.695~0.797), and 0.772 (95%CI: 0.723~0.821); external validation yielded 0.713 (95%CI: 0.648~0.778), 0.805 (95%CI: 0.749~0.861), and 0.851 (95%CI: 0.801~0.901). Calibration indicated high prediction-actuality concordance; DCA confirmed clinical utility.
The model and web calculator incorporating GAC/SPM characteristics effectively predict SPM patient prognosis.
23
9
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
