收藏切换
Midterm outcomes of Bentall procedure versus isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve with severe stenosis and ascending aortic dilation
收藏切换
Shijie LI, Tianbo LI, Zhipeng YANG, Chencheng LIU, Wencheng PAN, Bo XU, Yong WANG
Journal of Army Medical University | 2025, 47(13) : 1505 - 1511
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Army Medical University | 2025, 47(13): 1505-1511
• Clinical Medicine •
Midterm outcomes of Bentall procedure versus isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve with severe stenosis and ascending aortic dilation
Full
Shijie LI, Tianbo LI, Zhipeng YANG, Chencheng LIU, Wencheng PAN, Bo XU, Yong WANG
Affiliations
  • 1PLA Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery,Second Affiliated Hospital,Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University),Chongqing,China
Published: 2025-07-15 doi: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202503049
Outline
收藏切换
Objective‍

To compare the midterm outcomes of the Bentall procedure versus isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) complicated with severe stenosis and ascending aortic dilation in order to assess the therapeutic value of these surgical approaches for this complex cardiac condition.

Methods‍

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 96 eligible patients who underwent surgical treatment in our institute between January 2018 and December 2022. According to surgical approaches, they were divided into an AVR group (65 cases) and a Bentall group (31 cases). Demographic features, comorbidities, preoperative status, and echocardiographic parameters were collected in all patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied in a 1∶1 ratio to balance baseline characteristics. Perioperative indicators and follow-up data were compared and analyzed between matched cohorts after control of cofounding factors.

Results‍

After PSM, 25 matched pairs were screened out and analyzed with comparable baseline data (all P>0.05). The Bentall group demonstrated significantly more superior intraoperative effective orifice area (EOA, 2.69±0.47 vs 2.35±0.47 cm², P=0.013) and EOA index (EOAI, 1.69±0.30 vs 1.47±0.29 cm²/m², P=0.010), and obviously longer cardiopulmonary bypass time [190.00 (147.00, 257.00) vs 101.00 (88.50, 124.50) min, P<0.01] and aortic cross-clamp time [141.00 (120.00, 166.00) vs 66.00 (55.00, 81.50) min, P<0.01] when compared with the AVR group. During a median follow-up of 28 months, the AVR group had notably larger aortic sinus diameter [32.00 (30.00, 34.00) vs 26.80 (26.00, 28.00) mm, P<0.01] and ascending aortic diameter [38.00 (34.50, 42.00) mm vs 26.00 (26.00, 28.00) mm, P<0.01], with ongoing dilation in the ascending aorta, while the Bentall group maintained stable dimensions. The Bentall group also showed statistically lower peak aortic valve pressure gradients [21.00 (15.50, 27.00) vs 25.00 (19.50, 31.00) mmHg, P=0.049].

Conclusion‍

Both Bentall procedure and AVR are effective in treatment of BAV complicated with severe stenosis and ascending aortic dilation. But, Bentall procedure offers advantages in hemodynamic optimization and aortic stability.

bicuspid aortic valve  /  severe aortic stenosis  /  ascending aortic dilation  /  aortic valve replacement  /  Bentall procedure
李仕杰, 李畑波, 杨志鹏, 刘宸铖, 潘文成, 徐博, 王咏. Bentall术与单纯主动脉瓣置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣畸形合并重度狭窄及升主动脉扩张的中期疗效对比. 陆军军医大学学报, 2025 , 47 (13) : 1505 -1511 . DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202503049
Shijie LI, Tianbo LI, Zhipeng YANG, Chencheng LIU, Wencheng PAN, Bo XU, Yong WANG. Midterm outcomes of Bentall procedure versus isolated aortic valve replacement for bicuspid aortic valve with severe stenosis and ascending aortic dilation[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2025 , 47 (13) : 1505 -1511 . DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202503049
Year 2025 volume 47 Issue 13
14
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202503049
  • Receive Date:2025-03-13
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2025-07-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-13
  • Revised:2025-06-03
Affiliations
    1PLA Institute of Cardiovascular Surgery,Second Affiliated Hospital,Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University),Chongqing,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ljjydxxb/EN/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202503049
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT