收藏切换
Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy in third-line treatment of microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer
收藏切换
Wensi ZHAO1, Jian SONG2
Journal of Army Medical University | 2025, 47(13) : 1512 - 1521
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Army Medical University | 2025, 47(13): 1512-1521
• Clinical Medicine •
Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy in third-line treatment of microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer
Full
Wensi ZHAO1, Jian SONG2
Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,China
  • 2Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,China
Published: 2025-07-15 doi: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202504016
Outline
收藏切换
Objective‍

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy and chemotherapy in third-line treatment of patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods‍

A retrospective cohort trial was conducted on patients with MSS mCRC treated with third-line immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy in our hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The clinical data were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and other indicators were statistically analyzed to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The incidence and severity of adverse events during the treatment process were recorded to assess the safety.

Results‍

A total of 80 patients were included in the analysis, 55 in the group of immunotherapy plus targeted therapy and 25 in the group of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy. The group of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy had significantly longer median PFS (6.3 vs 4.4 months; HR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.35~0.96; P=0.031) and OS (15.5 vs 10.1 months; HR=0.47, 95%CI: 0.27~0.81; P=0.006), and obviously higher ORR (32.0% vs 10.9%; OR=0.26, 95%CI: 0.07~0.79; P=0.021) and DCR (92.0% vs 78.2%; OR=0.31, 95%CI: 0.07~1.52; P=0.132) when compared to the group of immunotherapy plus targeted therapy. The incidence of adverse events at all grade and at grade 3 and above was 96.4% and 32.7% in the group of immunotherapy plus targeted therapy, and 100.0% and 36.0% in the group of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy, which mainly included bone marrow hematopoietic inhibition, hand-foot skin reaction, liver function impairment and thyroid function abnormality.

Conclusion‍

The triple therapy of immunotherapy plus targeted therapy and chemotherapy is a more effective and safer treatment than the double therapy of immunotherapy plus targeted therapy in treatment of MSS mCRC patients.

colorectal cancer  /  microsatellite stability  /  immunotherapy  /  targeted therapy  /  chemotherapy
赵文思, 宋健. 免疫治疗联合靶向治疗及化疗在微卫星稳定型转移性结直肠癌患者三线治疗中的疗效和安全性. 陆军军医大学学报, 2025 , 47 (13) : 1512 -1521 . DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202504016
Wensi ZHAO, Jian SONG. Efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy and chemotherapy in third-line treatment of microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Journal of Army Medical University, 2025 , 47 (13) : 1512 -1521 . DOI: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202504016
Year 2025 volume 47 Issue 13
19
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.16016/j.2097-0927.202504016
  • Receive Date:2025-04-05
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2025-07-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-04-05
  • Revised:2025-05-18
Affiliations
    1Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,China
    2Department of Pharmacy, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei,China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ljjydxxb/EN/10.16016/j.2097-0927.202504016
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT