收藏切换
Comparative Study on Strength Prediction Models of Small Sample Grouting Materials
收藏切换
Donghao ZHAI1, Xiangpeng WANG1, 2, Leijun YAO3, Libo FAN3, Xu WU1, Qiuping KONG4, Yanbao LU4
Mining Research and Development | 2026, 46(4) : 170 - 177
Less
收藏切换
Mining Research and Development | 2026, 46(4): 170-177
Comparative Study on Strength Prediction Models of Small Sample Grouting Materials
Full
Donghao ZHAI1, Xiangpeng WANG1, 2, Leijun YAO3, Libo FAN3, Xu WU1, Qiuping KONG4, Yanbao LU4
Affiliations
  • 1.College of Computer and Network Security, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • 2.Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration and Information Technology of Ministry of Education, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • 3.China Anneng Group Third Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 611136, China
  • 4.Fujian Yongqiang Rock and Soil Co., Ltd., Longyan, Fujian 364000, China
Published: 2026-04-25
Outline
收藏切换

The strength prediction of grouting materials is of great significance to improve the reliability of material design for grouting. Aiming at the problems that the traditional empirical models are difficult to accurately capture the relationship between material composition and strength, and the insufficient generalization ability of models caused by small samples, a machine learning prediction framework combining physical mechanism and data enhancement was proposed. The material performance prediction results of four machine learning methods, Random Forest Regression (RFR), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Linear Regression (LR), were compared and analyzed. The results show that the RFR model has the best predictive performance, and its determination coefficient (R2) is increased to 0.934, which is 21.8%, 10.4% and 1.6% higher than that of LR, SVR and ANN models, respectively. The mean square error MAE is reduced to 2.59, which is 14.5%, 13.4% and 9.1% lower than that of LR, SVR and ANN models, respectively. In the analysis of feature importance, the contribution of graphite ratio to compressive strength is 37.6%. The data enhancement technique based on physical constraints can significantly improve the robustness of small sample modeling. The MAE of RFR and ANN models increases by 39.8% and 18.3% respectively compared to those without data enhancement. The prediction error of the RFR model remains stable below 10% under various water-solid ratio conditions. The research results can provide reference for the proportion of grouting reinforcement materials in mines.

Grouting material  /  Strength prediction  /  Machine learning prediction framework  /  Data enhancement
翟东豪, 王向鹏, 姚磊钧, 樊立博, 吴旭, 孔秋平, 卢焱保. 小样本注浆材料强度预测模型对比研究. 矿业研究与开发, 2026 , 46 (4) : 170 -177 .
Donghao ZHAI, Xiangpeng WANG, Leijun YAO, Libo FAN, Xu WU, Qiuping KONG, Yanbao LU. Comparative Study on Strength Prediction Models of Small Sample Grouting Materials[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2026 , 46 (4) : 170 -177 .
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 4
37
14
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-04-29
  • Online Date:2026-10-29
  • Published:2026-04-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-04-29
Funding
Affiliations
    1.College of Computer and Network Security, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
    2.Key Laboratory of Earth Exploration and Information Technology of Ministry of Education, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
    3.China Anneng Group Third Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd., Chengdu, Sichuan 611136, China
    4.Fujian Yongqiang Rock and Soil Co., Ltd., Longyan, Fujian 364000, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kyyjykf/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT