收藏切换
Practical experience and implications for improving the overall efficiency of the U.S. national innovation system
收藏切换
Kai-hua CHEN1, Hong-xin LIU1, Yu-jie ZHANG2, Ning LI3
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(7) : 1393 - 1401
Less
收藏切换
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(7): 1393-1401
• Hot Issues •
Practical experience and implications for improving the overall efficiency of the U.S. national innovation system
Full
Kai-hua CHEN1, Hong-xin LIU1, Yu-jie ZHANG2, Ning LI3
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 2 School of Business, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
  • 3 Department of Political Science and Public Policy, East Washington University, Cheney 99004, USA
Published: 2026-07-15
Outline
收藏切换

The United States has methodically constructed a remarkably efficient and resilient national innovation system. This sustained endeavor has enabled the nation to successfully transcend its initial position as a technological follower, ultimately achieving and consolidating preeminent global leadership in innovation. Furthermore, the US has consistently reinforced its dominant standing within critical frontier scientific and technological domains on the world stage. A comprehensive longitudinal analysis of the trajectory underpinning the enhancement of this system’s overall functional efficacy reveals four distinct and consequential developmental phases. During the foundational formative stage, innovation activities were overwhelmingly propelled by private initiative and market dynamics, leading organically to the nascent emergence of the national innovation system’s fundamental architecture. The exigencies of World War II precipitated significantly heightened governmental engagement and strategic direction, decisively steering the system’s evolution towards a more organized, centrally coordinated framework aimed at enhancing collective output. Subsequently, spanning the prolonged Cold War era through the dawn of the 21st century, a deliberate and resource-intensive dual-track development strategy—simultaneously advancing military technological supremacy and robust civilian technological advancement—acted as the principal engine driving a comprehensive, multi-faceted elevation of the entire system’s aggregate efficiency and innovative capacity. Entering the 21st century, the strategic paradigm has demonstrably shifted towards an integrated focus on both cutting-edge scientific prowess and sustained economic competitiveness, viewed through the prism of intensifying great power rivalry. This reorientation necessitates and actively drives continuous dynamic adaptation and meticulous, ongoing optimization within the national innovation system, yielding demonstrable, steady gains in its overarching operational efficiency and global impact. This research critically examines the indispensable catalytic role played by governmental entities in orchestrating the construction, refinement, and functional augmentation of the national innovation ecosystem. Our analysis discerns that the demonstrable enhancement of the US system’s overall efficacy is fundamentally characterized by several interconnected pillars: the paramount importance of clear, forward-leaning strategic orientation providing decisive direction; the continuous, deliberate refinement of organizational and institutional architectures to maximize coordination and responsiveness; the systematic cultivation and nurturing of a vibrant, interconnected innovation ecosystem fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange; and the establishment of a robust, multi-layered policy framework offering sustained, foundational support. Furthermore, by scrutinizing emergent trends and strategic recalibrations within the contemporary US innovation landscape and assessing their profound potential ramifications under evolving global dynamics, this study extrapolates pertinent insights and proposes actionable countermeasures for augmenting the holistic efficacy of China’s national innovation system. Key recommendations encompass: intensifying proactive, strategically-aligned foresight exercises coupled with mechanisms for agile policy and resource adjustment; advancing the paradigm of organized, mission-oriented basic research, rigorously aligned with both long-term strategic imperatives and pressing societal/industrial needs; accelerating the development of a high-performance innovation ecosystem distinguished by the seamless, frictionless flow and optimal allocation of critical talent, capital, knowledge, and infrastructural resources; and systematically enhancing the coherence and comprehensiveness of the integrated innovation policy support system to provide holistic, effective underpinning.

national innovation system  /  overall efficiency  /  practical experience  /  United States
陈凯华, 刘泓欣, 张宇杰, 李宁. 美国国家创新体系整体效能提升的实践经验与启示. 科学学研究, 2026 , 44 (7) : 1393 -1401 .
Kai-hua CHEN, Hong-xin LIU, Yu-jie ZHANG, Ning LI. Practical experience and implications for improving the overall efficiency of the U.S. national innovation system[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026 , 44 (7) : 1393 -1401 .
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 7
31
9
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-05-15
  • Online Date:2026-10-17
  • Published:2026-07-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-05-15
  • Revised:2025-07-22
Funding
Affiliations
    1 School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    2 School of Business, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China
    3 Department of Political Science and Public Policy, East Washington University, Cheney 99004, USA
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxxyj/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT