收藏切换
The evaluation of China's science popularization policy based on the "Dual-Effect" hybrid approach
收藏切换
Lan-jian LIU1, Li XUE2, Yao XIAO3
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(2) : 434 - 448
Less
收藏切换
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(2): 434-448
• Frontiers and Opinions •
The evaluation of China's science popularization policy based on the "Dual-Effect" hybrid approach
Full
Lan-jian LIU1, Li XUE2, Yao XIAO3
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
  • 2 College of Humanities, Chang’an University, Xi'an 710064, China
  • 3 School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Published: 2026-02-15
Outline
收藏切换

The evaluation of public policies has been a long-standing concern for both the government and academia. However, most studies either focus on the effectiveness of the text or the outcomes rarely examining the complete chain from policy effectiveness to policy outcomes. This paper, based on the "dual effectiveness" mixed method, takes China's science popularization as an example, and uses panel data from 31 provinces from 2012 to 2022 to conduct empirical analysis, systematically investigating impact of policy effectiveness on policy outcomes and its mechanism. The study finds that policy effectiveness has a significant impact on policy outcomes; the level of policy effectiveness and outcomes significantly depending on the target audience, with the highest performance seen in incentive policies, followed by protective policies, and the weakest in environmental policies; among the four dimensions policy, policy measures have the greatest impact on the effectiveness of policy implementation, followed by policy feedback and policy goals. Therefore, the government should further strengthen the driving of incentive policies, improve the efficiency of incentive policy supply through revision of incentive measures. And improve the overall effectiveness and outcome of the policy by enhancing policy measures, goals, policy strength, and policy feedback. The marginal contributions of this paper are as follows:(1) By adopting a "dual-effect" mixed method, it first quantitatively measures the effectiveness of popular science policies, then analyzes the impact of policy effectiveness on policy outcomes, providing a more objective measurement of the validity of policy texts and their influence on actual implementation outcomes;(2) Starting from multiple factors influencing policy implementation outcomes, it comprehensively considers the impact of policy effectiveness, different categories of policy effectiveness, and various policy dimensions on policy execution results, in order to avoid one-sidedness and subjectivity in policy performance evaluation;(3) Using the established policy effectiveness evaluation model as a tool, a more accurate assessment of the implementation effects of different policy documents and policy instruments can be conducted.

science popularization policy  /  effectiveness  /  outcome  /  policy evaluation  /  science popularization
刘兰剑, 薛丽, 肖瑶. 基于“双效”混合方法的我国科普政策评估. 科学学研究, 2026 , 44 (2) : 434 -448 .
Lan-jian LIU, Li XUE, Yao XIAO. The evaluation of China's science popularization policy based on the "Dual-Effect" hybrid approach[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026 , 44 (2) : 434 -448 .
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 2
57
28
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2024-09-24
  • Online Date:2026-10-09
  • Published:2026-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-09-24
  • Revised:2025-02-24
Funding
Affiliations
    1 School of Public Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    2 College of Humanities, Chang’an University, Xi'an 710064, China
    3 School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxxyj/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT