收藏切换
Influencing factors and configurational pathways of disruptive green innovation in manufacturing enterprises
收藏切换
Xiao-hua XIN, Yan-ying SHANG
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(6) : 1252 - 1263
Less
收藏切换
Studies in Science of Science | 2026, 44(6): 1252-1263
• Innovation Explorations •
Influencing factors and configurational pathways of disruptive green innovation in manufacturing enterprises
Full
Xiao-hua XIN, Yan-ying SHANG
Affiliations
  • School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
Published: 2026-06-15
Outline
收藏切换

Facing escalating environmental challenges and global competition, manufacturing enterprises must adopt disruptive green innovation strategies to achieve sustainable economic and environmental benefits. Disruptive green innovation refers to the process where enterprises introduce green products or services with different performance attributes from those required by mainstream consumers, initially targeting low-end or niche markets, and gradually improving the product to disrupt the mainstream market. Despite its importance in enhancing sustainable competitiveness and meeting the "dual carbon" goals, disruptive green innovation faces challenges due to its complexity, high risks, and uncertainty. This raises an important question: What factors lead to the more effective implementation of disruptive green innovation, and how do these factors interact?

This study adopts a mixed-methods approach by combining case studies of BYD and Luyuan with fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), to explore the factors driving disruptive green innovation. The results of case study identify several key drivers, including innovation ecosystem coopetition, green knowledge acquisition, green R&D investment, environmental resource coordination, and big data analytics capability. Using survey data from 332 manufacturing enterprises in strategic emerging industries, this study applies fsQCA to uncover configurational pathways driving disruptive green innovation. Key findings include: (1) Innovation ecosystem coopetition, green knowledge acquisition, green R&D investment, environmental resource orchestration, and big data analytics capability constitute core antecedents of disruptive green innovation. (2) No single antecedent is a necessary condition for disruptive green innovation. (3) Six configurational paths enabling high disruptive green innovation are categorized into four types: knowledge-data-driven pathway under cooperation dominance, knowledge-R&D-driven pathway under competition dominance, R&D-data-driven pathway under coopetition dominance, capability-led driven pathway, with substitutable relationships among element combinations under specific conditions. (4) Non-high disruptive green innovation configurations fall into two types: collaboration-resource-data-constrained and knowledge-R&D-data-constrained. This research provides theoretical and practical insights into how enterprises achieve disruptive green innovation across diverse contexts.

This study makes several theoretical contributions. First, this study enriches the research on antecedent factors of disruptive green innovation by case study. Currently, research on the drivers of disruptive green innovation is still in its early stages. Through exploratory case studies, this study investigates key antecedents of disruptive green innovation and expands the understanding of this concept. Second, this study also identifies the configuration paths driving disruptive green innovation, which improves and deepens the analytical paradigm of its formation mechanism. Existing studies on the antecedents of disruptive green innovation have rarely focused on the joint effects of multiple factors. Given the complexity and systemic nature of disruptive green innovation, this study applies the fsQCA method from a configurational perspective to explore the co-action of factors such as innovation ecosystem coopetition, green knowledge acquisition, green R&D investment, environmental resource orchestration, and big data analytics capability. By adopting a mixed-methods approach, this study offers a more comprehensive interpretation of the research model, revealing results that might be overlooked by a single method. This approach helps to improve the understanding of how enterprises conduct disruptive green innovation.

From a practical perspective, this study suggests that enterprises should adjust their innovation paths based on their strengths and market demands, optimizing their roles and strategies within the innovation ecosystem, especially when facing international competition. Digital technologies, particularly big data analytics capability, are identified as key drivers for disruptive green innovation. Enterprises should also strengthen coopetition relationships with partners, engage in cross-sector collaboration, and share knowledge to enhance green innovation. Additionally, investing in green R&D and improving resource coordination are essential for achieving sustainable green innovation.

disruptive green innovation  /  innovation ecosystem coopetition  /  big data analytics capability  /  fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)
辛晓华, 尚晏莹. 制造企业颠覆性绿色创新的影响因素及作用路径. 科学学研究, 2026 , 44 (6) : 1252 -1263 .
Xiao-hua XIN, Yan-ying SHANG. Influencing factors and configurational pathways of disruptive green innovation in manufacturing enterprises[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2026 , 44 (6) : 1252 -1263 .
Year 2026 volume 44 Issue 6
138
67
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-03-03
  • Online Date:2026-09-22
  • Published:2026-06-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-03
  • Revised:2025-04-30
Funding
Affiliations
    School of Economics and Management, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kxxyj/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT