收藏切换
A Comparative Study of the Environmental Reports about Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) between Newspapers in China and USA
收藏切换
PDF
Wenyu Zhu, Bing Liu
Studies on Science Popularization | 2015, 10(2) : 12 - 20
Less
收藏切换
Studies on Science Popularization | 2015, 10(2): 12-20
Research Paper
A Comparative Study of the Environmental Reports about Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) between Newspapers in China and USA
Full
Wenyu Zhu, Bing Liu
Affiliations
  • Institute of Science and Society, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
Published: 2015-04-10
Outline
收藏切换

We compared the media reporting on the PM2.5 by the major newspapers in China and the USA. In particular, we examined the differences in the total numbers, contents, genres, and sources of the reports on the PM2.5 in the People's Daily of China and the New York Times of the USA. Our goals here are to better understand the current status of the reporting on the environmental issues in China and to draw lessons from the USA. We found that the reporting in the two countries differs in the coverage patterns, focuses, formats, styles, and sources of news and concluded that there are fewer scientific facts and knowledge, limited sources of news, less investigational reporting, and a lack of informed environmental ethics in the reporting in China.

PM2.5  /  environmental journalism  /  and US comparing
Wenyu Zhu, Bing Liu. A Comparative Study of the Environmental Reports about Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) between Newspapers in China and USA[J]. Studies on Science Popularization, 2015 , 10 (2) : 12 -20 .
Year 2015 volume 10 Issue 2
PDF
12
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2015-03-13
  • Online Date:2026-07-29
  • Published:2015-04-10
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2015-03-13
Funding
Affiliations
    Institute of Science and Society, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kpyj/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT