Studies on Science Popularization
|
2023, 18(2): 47-53
• Science Popularization Capacity •
A Comparative Study on Typical Refutation Mechanisms for Science and Technology Related Rumors for Emergency Management
Full
Wang Ming1
Affiliations
1 Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan 411201
doi: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.02.006
Outline
In public emergencies, rumor related to science and technologyon the internet damage social stability and shared interests. Scientific rumor refutation is a key method to deal with it. The traditional anti-rumor mechanism mainly includes four types such as government-leading, media-leading, public participation and multi-agent collaboration. Analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the above mechanism in rumor refutation will help to build a more effective rumor governance system. To strengthen the governance of the rumors related to science and technology, we need to integrate different anti-rumor organizations, build a rumor governance community, and take advantage of the four types of rumor suppression mechanisms. Governments at all levels should incorporate the anti-rumor job into the public opinion management work system, strengthen the construction of joint anti-rumor mechanism led by the government, and create an accessible way for public participation.
rumor related to science and technology
/
rumor refutation mechanism
/
collaborative governance
/
public participation
Wang Ming.
A Comparative Study on Typical Refutation Mechanisms for Science and Technology Related Rumors for Emergency Management[J].
Studies on Science Popularization,
2023
, 18
(2)
: 47
-53
.
DOI: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.02.006
Year 2023 volume 18 Issue 2
PDF
9
4
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.19293/j.cnki.1673-8357.2023.02.006
- Receive Date:2022-08-21
- Online Date:2026-09-17