收藏切换
Empirical Research on Industry-specific ESG and Subcategory Performance Analysis of China’s Listed Companies
收藏切换
PDF
Tongxuan ZOU
Science Technology and Industry | 2025, 25(12) : 229 - 237
Less
收藏切换
Science Technology and Industry | 2025, 25(12): 229-237
Enterprise Application
Empirical Research on Industry-specific ESG and Subcategory Performance Analysis of China’s Listed Companies
Full
Tongxuan ZOU
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis 55455-0443, USA
Published: 2025-06-25
Outline
收藏切换

ESG ratings from Bloomberg(2006—2022), Huazheng(2009—2023) and China’s listed companies as samples were used. Correlations of ESG scores, ESG in different industries, and heterogeneity analysis of ESG was explored. Empirical results show that Environment(E), Social(S) and Governance(G) affect ESG scores significantly, with G having the greatest impact, followed by E and then S. ESG performance varies across industries. The finance-insurance sector is good at environment but weak in social aspects. The accommodation industry improves ESG ranking through social efforts. The agriculture and forestry service industry has an imbalance in governance and social development. ESG strategy advice are given for the government and companies.

ESG  /  subcategory scores  /  China’s listed companies  /  empirical research
Tongxuan ZOU. Empirical Research on Industry-specific ESG and Subcategory Performance Analysis of China’s Listed Companies[J]. Science Technology and Industry, 2025 , 25 (12) : 229 -237 .
Year 2025 volume 25 Issue 12
PDF
390
205
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
  • Receive Date:2025-01-12
  • Online Date:2025-12-17
  • Published:2025-06-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-01-12
Affiliations
    University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minneapolis 55455-0443, USA
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/kjhcy/EN/
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT