Disruptive technology is strategic technology that could overturn mainstream technology and reshape competitive landscape, characterized by complex evolution process and typical “non-consensus” attributes. Traditional research project evaluation methods, which rely on “one-time evaluation determines the lifetime outcome”, are unsuitable for disruptive technology projects. Instead, an evaluation-cultivation integrated approach should be adopted for their identification. Thus, the connotation of disruptive technology was analyzed, the typical practices and experiences of foreign institutions were drawn on, and three basic principles: “Logical Consensus, Inclusive Standards”, “Recognizing Strengths and Offseting Weaknesses, Sifting out the gold from the sand”, and “Tiered Planning, Dynamic Optimization” were proposed. It explores the construction of an evaluation-cultivation integrated mechanism aligned with the evolutionary traits of disruptive technologies, centered on “high-consensus logical reasoning”. The results provide methodological reference for accurately identifying disruptive technology.
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |