PDF
Full
Outline
The difference of laying methods in different sections of marine transmission line has a great impact on the ampacity of submarine cable, so it is of great significance to study the ampacity under typical laying methods in transmission section. In this paper, an electric-heat-current coupling model of submarine cable in landing section and submarine section of submarine cable line in ±160 kV DC transmission project was established. On the basis of finite element method, the influence of air domain size, position of angle steel support, seawater and soil factor on the steady ampacity of submarine cable were studied under four typical laying methods, which is the submarine cable laid at the bottom of cable trench and laid on the angle steel support in landing section and the submarine cable laid and directly buried in submarine section. The results show that the submarine cable laid at the bottom of cable trench is greatly affected by the air domain size, and increasing the convection area can effectively improve the steady ampacity of submarine cable. The semi-closed area between the support and the inner wall of trench should be taken into account in calculating the ampacity of cable laid on the angle steel support. The temperature of submarine cable laid at the shallow depth of support is lower and its ampacity is larger. In the submarine section, the submarine cable temperature changes in the same direction with the rise and fall of sea water temperature, which is opposite to the increase and decrease trend of sea water velocity. The increase of soil temperature results in the decrease of buried submarine cable ampacity. The landing section is the bottleneck section of ampacity calculation, and the ampacity can be improved effectively by using the water filling cable trench when the submarine cable is laid at the bottom of cable trench. When the submarine cable is laid on the support, the ampacity can meet the engineering requirements by installing cooling water pipe.
PDF
101
47
| 科 Family | 属数 Number of genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) | 属 Genus | 种数 Number of species | 占总种数比例 Percentage of total species (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae | 2 | 11 | 5.26 | 鹅膏菌属 Amanita | 10 | 4.78 |
| 小菇科 Mycenaceae | 2 | 12 | 5.74 | 丝盖伞属 Inocybe | 5 | 2.39 |
| 多孔菌科 Polyporaceae | 8 | 14 | 6.70 | 蜡蘑属 Laccaria | 5 | 2.39 |
| 红菇科 Russulaceae | 3 | 23 | 11.00 | 小皮伞属 Marasmius | 6 | 2.87 |
| 小菇属 Mycena | 11 | 5.26 | ||||
| 光柄菇属 Pluteus | 5 | 2.39 | ||||
| 红菇属 Russula | 17 | 8.13 | ||||
| 栓菌属 Trametes | 5 | 2.39 |
关闭全屏
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
010-62199257
qkjq@cast.org.cn
Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House
