收藏切换
An application strategy of combined controlled-release fertilizers can balance the yield and quality of soft wheat while meeting its nutrient requirements
收藏切换
PDF
Yingpeng Wang, Yifan Hua, Lanxin Mei, Yixuan Meng, Yongtao Guo, Jian Cai, Mei Huang, Yingxin Zhong, Xiao Wang, Dong Jiang, Qin Zhou
Journal of Integrative Agriculture | 2026, 25(7) : 2783 - 2795
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Integrative Agriculture | 2026, 25(7): 2783-2795
• Crop Science •
An application strategy of combined controlled-release fertilizers can balance the yield and quality of soft wheat while meeting its nutrient requirements
Full
Yingpeng Wang, Yifan Hua, Lanxin Mei, Yixuan Meng, Yongtao Guo, Jian Cai, Mei Huang, Yingxin Zhong, Xiao Wang, Dong Jiang, Qin Zhou
Affiliations
About Author:
#Correspondence Qin Zhou, Tel: +86-25-84399627, E-mail: qinzhou@njau.edu.cn * These authors contributed equally to this study.
doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.038
Outline
收藏切换
The application of slow-controlled release fertilizer is a simple and labor-saving cultivation technology that can improve the yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of wheat, although research on the impact of a single application of controlled-release nitrogen (N) fertilizers with different release periods on wheat grain quality is still limited.  In this study, urease inhibitor urea (AHA), sulfur-coated urea (SCU), a combination of SCU and AHA fertilizer (BSAF) and blended slow-controlled release fertilizer (BRNF) were used to investigate the effect of slow-controlled release fertilizers on the nutrient release, grain yield, NUE, and protein content of soft wheat.  The goal was to determine the effect of a one-time application of controlled release fertilizer on wheat grain yield and protein content and its underlying mechanisms.  The results showed that the different slow-controlled release fertilizer treatments had significantly different N release rates.  AHA presented a fast release mode, while SCU and BSAF presented slow-release modes, and BRNF presented a controlled release mode.  Compared with CK, BRNF increased grain yield and reduced the protein content of soft wheat, with an average increase of 6.73% in grain yield and a reduction of 1.85% in protein content.  The higher N absorption of BRNF led to greater NUE, N agronomic efficiency (NAE) and N apparent recovery fraction (NRF).  However, AHA, SCU and BSAF all showed the opposite trend.  Compared with CK, BRNF improved post-anthesis dry matter accumulation (PDMA) and the contribution rate of dry matter accumulated post-anthesis to the grain (CDA), while reducing post-anthesis N accumulation (PNA) and the contribution rate of post-anthesis N accumulation to grain (CNA).  The main reasons for the improvement in yield and reduction in protein content were related to the increases in PDMA and CDA, and the reductions in PNA and CNA, respectively.  Therefore, BRNF is an effective agronomic strategy for promoting the coordination of grain yield and quality in soft wheat.
yield  /  nitrogen use efficiency  /  controlled release blend fertilizer  /  soil nitrogen distribution  /  root
. 缓控释肥料的组合配施策略能够在满足弱筋小麦养分需求的同时平衡其产量和品质. 农业科学学报(英文版), 2026 , 25 (7) : 2783 -2795 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.038
Yingpeng Wang, Yifan Hua, Lanxin Mei, Yixuan Meng, Yongtao Guo, Jian Cai, Mei Huang, Yingxin Zhong, Xiao Wang, Dong Jiang, Qin Zhou. An application strategy of combined controlled-release fertilizers can balance the yield and quality of soft wheat while meeting its nutrient requirements[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026 , 25 (7) : 2783 -2795 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.038
Year 2026 volume 25 Issue 7
PDF
2
0
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.038
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/jia/EN/10.1016/j.jia.2025.02.038
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT