收藏切换
Using mixed kernel support vector machine to improve the predictive accuracy of genome selection
收藏切换
PDF
Journal of Integrative Agriculture | 2026, 25(2) : 775 - 787
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Integrative Agriculture | 2026, 25(2): 775-787
• Animal Science · Veterinary Medicine •
Using mixed kernel support vector machine to improve the predictive accuracy of genome selection
Full
Jinbu Wang1, Wencheng Zong1, Liangyu Shi2, Mianyan Li1, Jia Li1,3, Deming Ren1,4, Fuping Zhao1, Lixian Wang1#, Ligang Wang1#
Affiliations
    1Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction (poultry) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
    2School of Animal Science and Nutritional Engineering, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan 430023, China
    3College of Animal Science and Technology, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
    4College of Animal Science and Technology, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
About Author:
Jinbu Wang, E-mail: w18439393365@163.com; #Correspondence Lixian Wang, E-mail: iaswlx@263.net; Ligang Wang, E-mail: wangligang01@caas.cn
doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083
Outline
收藏切换
The advantages of genome selection (GS) in animal and plant breeding are self-evident. Traditional parametric models have disadvantage in better fit the increasingly large sequencing data and capture complex effects accurately. Machine learning models have demonstrated remarkable potential in addressing these challenges. In this study, we introduced the concept of mixed kernel functions to explore the performance of support vector machine regression (SVR) in GS. Six single kernel functions (SVR_L, SVR_C, SVR_G, SVR_P, SVR_S, SVR_L) and four mixed kernel functions (SVR_GS, SVR_GP, SVR_LS, SVR_LP) were used to predict genome breeding values. The prediction accuracy, mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) were used as evaluation indicators to compare with two traditional parametric models (GBLUP, BayesB) and two popular machine learning models (RF, KcRR). The results indicate that in most cases, the performance of the mixed kernel function model significantly outperforms that of GBLUP, BayesB and single kernel function. For instance, for T1 in the pig dataset, the predictive accuracy of SVR_GS is improved by 10% compared to GBLUP, and by approximately 4.4 and 18.6% compared to SVR_G and SVR_S respectively. For E1 in the wheat dataset, SVR_GS achieves 13.3% higher prediction accuracy than GBLUP. Among single kernel functions, the Laplacian and Gaussian kernel functions yield similar results, with the Gaussian kernel function performing better. The mixed kernel function notably reduces the MSE and MAE when compared to all single kernel functions. Furthermore, regarding runtime, SVR_GS and SVR_GP mixed kernel functions run approximately three times faster than GBLUP in the pig dataset, with only a slight increase in runtime compared to the single kernel function model. In summary, the mixed kernel function model of SVR demonstrates speed and accuracy competitiveness, and the model such as SVR_GS has important application potential for GS.
GuanJianCi_EN
. 混合核支持向量机提高基因组选择预测准确性. 农业科学学报(英文版), 2026 , 25 (2) : 775 -787 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083
Jinbu Wang, Wencheng Zong, Liangyu Shi, Mianyan Li, Jia Li, Deming Ren, Fuping Zhao, Lixian Wang, Ligang Wang. Using mixed kernel support vector machine to improve the predictive accuracy of genome selection[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2026 , 25 (2) : 775 -787 . DOI: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083
Year 2026 volume 25 Issue 2
PDF
12
2
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
Article Data
Affiliations
History
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/jia/EN/10.1016/j.jia.2024.03.083
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT