收藏切换
Impacts of biotic and abiotic factors on the habitat suitability of Saurida elongata during autumn in the Haizhou Bay, China
收藏切换
PDF
Chengzhi Zhu1, Yunlei Zhang1, 3, Ke Sai1, Wenyu Wei1, Shuyu Xie1, Mingjing Xia1, Yiping Ren1, 2, 3, Ying Xue1, 3, *
Haiyang Xuebao | 2020, 42(6) : 44 - 51
Less
收藏切换
Haiyang Xuebao | 2020, 42(6): 44-51
Marine Biology
Impacts of biotic and abiotic factors on the habitat suitability of Saurida elongata during autumn in the Haizhou Bay, China
Full
Chengzhi Zhu1, Yunlei Zhang1, 3, Ke Sai1, Wenyu Wei1, Shuyu Xie1, Mingjing Xia1, Yiping Ren1, 2, 3, Ying Xue1, 3, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
  • 2 Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
  • 3 Field Observation and Research Station of Haizhou Bay Fishery Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Published: 2020-06-25 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2020.06.006
Outline
收藏切换

According to the demersal trawling survey data in the Haizhou Bay and its adjacent waters in autumn of 2011 and 2013−2018, we studied the habitat suitability of Saurida elongata, using biotic and abiotic factors data, such as bottom water temperature, bottom salinity, water depth, resource density, bait biology, collected synchronously. The weight of each environmental factor was determined by using the model of boost regression tree (BRT), and the habitat suitability index (HSI) model was established by using arithmetic mean method and geometry mean method respectively, and the optimal model was determined by cross validation. The results show that the most suitable bottom water temperature range for the Saurida elongata to inhabit in fall was 17.5−18℃, the most suitable bottom salinity range was 31.3−32, and the most suitable water depth range was 24−37 m. Three main bait organisms were selected as biological factors, namely, Loligo spp., Metapenaeopsis dalei and Amblychaeturichthys hexanema. The HSI model was established with the bottom water temperature, bottom salinity and water depth as the influencing factors. The results show that the feed factors contributed most significantly to the total deviation of spatial distribution, followed by the water depth and bottom water temperature. Through cross validation, it is found that the weighted HSI model with arithmetic mean method algorithm has lower Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The results show that the most suitable habitat (HSI≥0.7) of Saurida elongata in autumn was 34.5°−36°N, 119°−121°E, among which 35°−36°N was the most suitable habitat, and the HSI increased from near shore to sea.

Haizhou Bay  /  Saurida elongata  /  habitat suitability index (HSI)  /  environmental variables  /  biological variables  /  weights
Chengzhi Zhu, Yunlei Zhang, Ke Sai, Wenyu Wei, Shuyu Xie, Mingjing Xia, Yiping Ren, Ying Xue. Impacts of biotic and abiotic factors on the habitat suitability of Saurida elongata during autumn in the Haizhou Bay, China[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2020 , 42 (6) : 44 -51 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2020.06.006
Year 2020 volume 42 Issue 6
PDF
113
49
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2020.06.006
  • Receive Date:2019-10-19
  • Online Date:2026-03-26
  • Published:2020-06-25
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2019-10-19
  • Revised:2019-12-17
Funding
Affiliations
    1 Fisheries College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
    2 Laboratory for Marine Fisheries Science and Food Production Processes, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao 266237, China
    3 Field Observation and Research Station of Haizhou Bay Fishery Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/hyxb/EN/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2020.06.006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT