收藏切换
Differences of eDNA metabarcoding fragments in relative fish species resolution
收藏切换
PDF
Zhi Chen1, 2, Chunlai Ma1, 2, Le Ye1, 2, Chaojie Yang1, 2, Haishan Wang1, 2, *
Haiyang Xuebao | 2022, 44(8) : 51 - 65
Less
收藏切换
Haiyang Xuebao | 2022, 44(8): 51-65
Article
Differences of eDNA metabarcoding fragments in relative fish species resolution
Full
Zhi Chen1, 2, Chunlai Ma1, 2, Le Ye1, 2, Chaojie Yang1, 2, Haishan Wang1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation for Tropical Marine Bioresources, Ministry of Education, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572022, China
  • 2. Hainan Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Tropical Marine Fishery Resources, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572022, China
Published: 2022-08-01 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2022150
Outline
收藏切换

The applicability of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding fragments to relative fish species had not been compared. There was a risk of “species loss” in diversity surveys. In order to screen out the best fragments, we compared the resolution rate differences of 15 eDNA metabarcoding fragments in 106 genera (a total of 935 species). The results were as follows: (1) the protein-coding gene (COI, fragment 15) had the highest resolution rate, but the universality of its corresponding primer pairs was the worst; the overall mean distance based on primer pair sequence of fragment 09, fragment 11, fragment 07, fragment 03 and fragment 12 were obviously large, suggesting their eDNA amplification efficiency were possibly low. (2) The resolution rates were significantly affected by the length of fragments, and the fragment 05, fragment 06, fragment 01, fragment 02 and fragment 13 of ribosomal genes had a higher resolution rate except fragment 15. (3) Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis (NMDS) showed that there were great differences among different genes and different fragments belonging to the same gene. Therefore, the combination application of multi-fragment and multi-gene should be considered; besides, fragment 01 and fragment 02, and fragment 05 and fragment 06 were close to each other in the NMDS plot. They function of fish resolution were overlapped. (4) Species groups affected the resolution results, and eDNA studies stilled need to develop fragments with higher resolution rates. Based on the resolution rate of relative species, the universality of primer pairs and NMDS analysis, this study recommended fragment 01 (Mifish-U) for 2×150 bp sequencing platform and fragment 05 (Ac12S) for 2×250 bp sequencing platform, supplemented by fragment 13 (Vert-16S-eDNA) to investigate the diversity of relative fish. This study provided some support for improving the accuracy of fish eDNA survey results.

eDNA metabarcoding  /  relative fish species resolution  /  12S  /  amplicon length  /  multi-fragments
Zhi Chen, Chunlai Ma, Le Ye, Chaojie Yang, Haishan Wang. Differences of eDNA metabarcoding fragments in relative fish species resolution[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2022 , 44 (8) : 51 -65 . DOI: 10.12284/hyxb2022150
Year 2022 volume 44 Issue 8
PDF
168
72
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12284/hyxb2022150
  • Receive Date:2022-02-17
  • Online Date:2026-02-01
  • Published:2022-08-01
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-02-17
  • Revised:2022-03-25
Funding
Affiliations
    1. Key Laboratory of Utilization and Conservation for Tropical Marine Bioresources, Ministry of Education, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572022, China
    2. Hainan Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Tropical Marine Fishery Resources, Hainan Tropical Ocean University, Sanya 572022, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/hyxb/EN/10.12284/hyxb2022150
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT