收藏切换
Remote sensing retrieval of phytoplankton group in the eastern China seas
收藏切换
PDF
Haiyang Zhao1, Fang Shen1, *, Xuerong Sun1, Xiaodao Wei2
Haiyang Xuebao | 2022, 44(4) : 153 - 168
Less
收藏切换
Haiyang Xuebao | 2022, 44(4): 153-168
Article
Remote sensing retrieval of phytoplankton group in the eastern China seas
Full
Haiyang Zhao1, Fang Shen1, *, Xuerong Sun1, Xiaodao Wei2
Affiliations
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
  • 2. Institute of Eco-Chongming, East China Normal University, Shanghai 202162, China
Published: 2022-04-15 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2022062
Outline
收藏切换

Remote sensing retrieval of phytoplankton group can provide important data for a comprehensive understanding of the role of phytoplankton in marine ecosystem. However, due to the complex optical characteristics, there are still great challenges in the remote sensing retrieval of phytoplankton group in offshore waters. In this study, the eastern China seas region, a complex optical class II water body, is taken as the research area. By using three modeling methods, namely band combination method, multiple linear regression method based on singular value decomposition (SVD+MLR) and XGBoost regression method based on singular value decomposition (SVD+XGBoost), the phytoplankton group is retrieved from remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) data. Verified by the in-situ measured data set, the chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration retrieval model of eight phytoplankton groups by SVD+XGBoost has the highest accuracy, and the determination coefficient (R2) of Chl a concentration inversion model of diatoms and dinoflagellates in the validation set is greater than 0.7. In contrast, the accuracy of Chl a concentration of chlorophytes, cyanobacteria and chrysophytes estimated by the three modeling methods is low (the R2 of the validation results is less than 0.45). At the same time, the applicability of three atmospheric correction methods of OLCI images (C2RCC, POLYMER and MUMM) in the eastern China seas is evaluated. The results show that compared with the other two atmospheric correction algorithms, C2RCC has better performance in each band (root mean square error is less than 0.0048 sr−1). Finally, the performance of the retrieval model on satellite images is verified by the in-situ data. The validation results show that the diatoms Chl a concentration model established by SVD+MLR has better accuracy (the R2 is 0.56), while the Chl a concentration inversion models of other phytoplankton groups have poor results.

eastern China seas  /  phytoplankton group  /  remote sensing retrieval  /  OLCI  /  atmospheric correction
Haiyang Zhao, Fang Shen, Xuerong Sun, Xiaodao Wei. Remote sensing retrieval of phytoplankton group in the eastern China seas[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2022 , 44 (4) : 153 -168 . DOI: 10.12284/hyxb2022062
Year 2022 volume 44 Issue 4
PDF
142
53
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12284/hyxb2022062
  • Receive Date:2021-08-17
  • Online Date:2026-02-01
  • Published:2022-04-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2021-08-17
  • Revised:2021-11-20
Funding
Affiliations
    1. State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
    2. Institute of Eco-Chongming, East China Normal University, Shanghai 202162, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/hyxb/EN/10.12284/hyxb2022062
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT