收藏切换
Comparison of hydrodynamic performance of two types of wave energy converter-floating breakwater
收藏切换
PDF
Qiaoling Ji1, Guoqiang Chen1
Haiyang Xuebao | 2023, 45(6) : 122 - 133
Less
收藏切换
Haiyang Xuebao | 2023, 45(6): 122-133
Article
Comparison of hydrodynamic performance of two types of wave energy converter-floating breakwater
Full
Qiaoling Ji1, Guoqiang Chen1
Affiliations
  • 1College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
Published: 2023-06-30 doi: 10.12284/hyxb2023065
Outline
收藏切换

The wave energy converter-type floating breakwater is an integrated device of floating breakwater and wave energy converter, with both functions of wave protection and wave energy capture. The integration can effectively reduce the cost of wave energy converter with one single function. Researchers have proposed a variety of structural types of this integrated device. Among them, the asymmetric type has some advantages in hydrodynamic performance compared with the symmetric type under one single direction wave. In this study, two structural types of a square box-triangle baffle and a square box-vertical baffle are chosen to investigate the hydrodynamic characteristics and wave energy capture characteristics by numerical models. Based on the viscous fluid theory, the numerical model takes the Navier-Stokes equation as the control equation, and uses VOF method and immersion boundary method to solve the free surface boundary and fluid-structure interaction. The variation trend of hydrodynamic performances (transmission coefficient, energy dissipation and energy capture ratio) of the integrated device under different conditions of incident wave period, water depth and displacement volume are explored. The results show that, for the near shore waves, the vertical baffle type integrated device is suitable for the smaller period waves of 5−6 s, while the triangular baffle type integrated device is suitable for the bigger period waves of 6−8 s. As the water depth increases, the wave energy capture ratio generally shows a slow growth trend. In the case of the same draft of the main floating body (different displacement volume), the transmission coefficients of the two structures are basically the same. In the case of the same displacement volume (different draft of the main floating body), the vertical baffle structure has better wave-proof effect, and the wave energy capture performance of the triangular baffle structure is better than that of the vertical baffle structure.

wave energy converter; floating breakwater  /  structural type  /  hydrodynamic performance  /  wave energy capture  /  wave dissipation
Qiaoling Ji, Guoqiang Chen. Comparison of hydrodynamic performance of two types of wave energy converter-floating breakwater[J]. Haiyang Xuebao, 2023 , 45 (6) : 122 -133 . DOI: 10.12284/hyxb2023065
Year 2023 volume 45 Issue 6
PDF
190
78
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.12284/hyxb2023065
  • Receive Date:2022-08-02
  • Online Date:2025-12-26
  • Published:2023-06-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2022-08-02
  • Revised:2022-11-30
Funding
Affiliations
    1College of Transportation, Shandong University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266590, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/hyxb/EN/10.12284/hyxb2023065
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数

Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)

Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT