Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Fuel Cell Bus Powertrain Based on Combination Weighting Method
收藏切换
Jibin YANG  Member, CPSS1, 2, 3, Zonghu HE1, 3, Xiaohui XU1, 2, 3, Pengyi DENG1, 2, 3
Journal of Power Supply | 2026, 24(1) : 271 - 279
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Power Supply | 2026, 24(1): 271-279
• Transportation Electrification •
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Fuel Cell Bus Powertrain Based on Combination Weighting Method
Full
Jibin YANG  Member, CPSS1, 2, 3, Zonghu HE1, 3, Xiaohui XU1, 2, 3, Pengyi DENG1, 2, 3
Affiliations
  • 1.Vehicle Measurement Control and Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
  • 2.Provincial Engineering Research Center for New Energy Vehicle Intelligent Control and Simulation Test Technology of Sichuan, Chengdu 610039, China
  • 3.Sichuan Industrial School of Intelligent and New Energy Automobile, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
Published: 2026-01-30 doi: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271
Outline
收藏切换

To improve the test and evaluation technology system for fuel cell buses and effectively ensure their widespread applications, a comprehensive performance evaluation method for the power train of fuel cell buses is proposed, which combines the combination weighting method and subjective scoring method. First, a comprehensive performance evaluation system for the powertrain of fuel cell buses is constructed, and the test methods for each index are given. Then, the analytic hierarchy process and coefficient of variation are used to determine the subjective and objective weights of evaluation indexes, and the combination weighting method based on the game theory is used to obtain the comprehensive weights. On this basis, the subjective scoring method is used to score the test results of vehicles to be evaluated. At last, the comprehensive scores are obtained by weighted calculation with the comprehensive weight, which are further rated. The calculation result of an example shows that the comprehensive weight combining the subjective and objective weights over-comes the limitation of calculating the weight by only one single method and makes the evaluation results more objective and accurate, thus verifying the scientific nature and rationality of the evaluation system and method.

Fuel cell bus  /  powertrain  /  combination weighting method  /  comprehensive performance evaluation  /  game theory
杨继斌中国电源学会会员, 何宗虎, 徐晓惠, 邓鹏毅. 基于组合赋权法的燃料电池客车动力总成综合性能评价. 电源学报, 2026 , 24 (1) : 271 -279 . DOI: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271
Jibin YANG, Zonghu HE, Xiaohui XU, Pengyi DENG. Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Fuel Cell Bus Powertrain Based on Combination Weighting Method[J]. Journal of Power Supply, 2026 , 24 (1) : 271 -279 . DOI: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271
Funding
Less
  • Science & Technology Project of Sichuan Province(2023YFG0067; 2022YFG0092; 2023YFG0068)
Appendix
Less
Year 2026 volume 24 Issue 1
42
10
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271
  • Receive Date：2023-06-27
  • Online Date：2026-10-26
  • Published：2026-01-30
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2023-06-27
  • Revised：2023-08-12
  • Accepted：2023-08-23
Funding
Science & Technology Project of Sichuan Province(2023YFG0067; 2022YFG0092; 2023YFG0068)
Affiliations
    1.Vehicle Measurement Control and Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
    2.Provincial Engineering Research Center for New Energy Vehicle Intelligent Control and Simulation Test Technology of Sichuan, Chengdu 610039, China
    3.Sichuan Industrial School of Intelligent and New Energy Automobile, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/dyxb/EN/10.13234/j.issn.2095-2805.2026.1.271
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House