收藏切换
Review of Research Progress in Urban Rail Transit Network Optimization Models and Methods
收藏切换
Ya Liu1, Zijia Wang2, Ruoyu Hou1
Urban Rapid Rail Transit | 2026, 39(4) : 53 - 58
Less
收藏切换
Urban Rapid Rail Transit | 2026, 39(4): 53-58
• Special Feature: 200th Issue •
Review of Research Progress in Urban Rail Transit Network Optimization Models and Methods
Full
Ya Liu1, Zijia Wang2, Ruoyu Hou1
Affiliations
  • 1.CIECC Overseas Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing 100068
  • 2.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6073.2026.04.006
Outline
收藏切换

With the transition of urban rail transit toward networked operations, the scientific planning of transit networks is critical for ensuring operational efficiency and service quality. This systematically the research progress on optimization models and methodologies for urban rail transit networks, based on relevant studies published from 2015 to 2025. Current rail transit network optimization models suffer from idealized assumptions and insufficient characterization of practical constraints. Moreover, the three mainstream solution approaches—exact algorithms, intelligent heuristic algorithms, and deep reinforcement learning—each have respective drawbacks in computation efficiency, stability, generalization capacity and other aspects. The paper begins by establishing a taxonomy of transit network planning problems from three perspectives: planning scenarios, modeling formulations, and solution method. Then, in terms of optimization models, the evolution from single-objective to multi-objective formulations is reviewed, highlighting the development of multi-dimensional objective systems involving efficiency, cost, equity, and resilience. This paper further summarizes the main advances in initial network generation models and existing network expansion optimization models. On the algorithmic side, the paper covers exact methods, metaheuristic algorithms, surrogate-assisted optimization, and the emerging deep reinforcement learning (DRL) paradigm, with particular attention to studies that formulate network design as a Markov Decision Process (MDP). It is concluded that the existing optimization models generally have structural defects and deviate from engineering practice. They fail to fully characterize practical constraints such as transfer layouts, capacity limits and time-varying passenger flows, which greatly reduces their practical application value. Five research directions are therefore proposed to improve relevant research: constructing a hybrid optimization framework for large-scale networks, establishing an integrated supply-demand coordination model, developing collaborative optimization theories for multi-mode rail transit systems, forming a low-carbon sustainable optimization system, and building a digital twin-driven dynamic decision-making model.

urban rail transit  /  network planning  /  optimization models  /  deep reinforcement learning  /  passenger reassignment  /  bilevel programming
刘亚, 王子甲, 侯若愚. 城市轨道交通线网优化模型与方法研究进展综述. 都市快轨交通, 2026 , 39 (4) : 53 -58 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6073.2026.04.006
Ya Liu, Zijia Wang, Ruoyu Hou. Review of Research Progress in Urban Rail Transit Network Optimization Models and Methods[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2026 , 39 (4) : 53 -58 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6073.2026.04.006
Year 2026 volume 39 Issue 4
186
44
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6073.2026.04.006
  • Receive Date:2026-05-18
  • Online Date:2026-09-20
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2026-05-18
  • Revised:2026-07-03
Funding
Affiliations
    1.CIECC Overseas Consulting Co., Ltd., Beijing 100068
    2.School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/dskgjt/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6073.2026.04.006
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT