收藏切换
Cave Strain Observation and Barometric Pressure Effect around Eastern Dabie Orogenic Belt
收藏切换
Jun LIN1, 2, Pinji LÜ1, 2, *
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2025, 45(2) : 195 - 202
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2025, 45(2): 195-202
Cave Strain Observation and Barometric Pressure Effect around Eastern Dabie Orogenic Belt
Full
Jun LIN1, 2, Pinji LÜ1, 2, *
Affiliations
  • 1 Hubei Earthquake Agency, 48 Hongshance Road, Wuhan 430071, China
  • 2 Wuhan Gravitation and Solid Earth Tides, National Observation and Research Station, 40 Hongshance Road, Wuhan 430071, China
  • LIN Jun, engineer, majors in earthquake monitoring and prediction, E-mail:

About Author:

LIN Jun, engineer, majors in earthquake monitoring and prediction, E-mail:

Published: 2025-02-15 doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.03.093
Outline
收藏切换

Based on the barometric effect analysis of the observed cave strain data from five observation stations on the periphery of the eastern Dabie orogenic belt, we find that: 1) The correlation between the observed cave strain and barometric pressure and earth tide is weak for the low frequency domain, the correlation between any two of the three is obvious for the middle frequency domain, while the correlation between the cave strain and barometric pressure for the high frequency domain is less than that for the middle frequency domain, but it increases exponentially with the increase of frequency. The response of cave strain to barometric pressure is prominent for the middle frequency domain. 2) During the nine short-period pressure fluctuation events from 2019 to 2022, the cave strain shows similar characteristics to the barometric pressure change for time domain, frequency domain, change pattern and spatial propagation direction. 3) Combining the different bedrock lithology, covering thickness and topographic characteristics of the five observation stations, we consider that the bedrock of Macheng station is complete and deep, so the barometric pressure response amplitude of Macheng station is the most significant and the average pressure coefficient is the largest, indicating that the rock mass elasticity of its covering layer is good. On the contrary, Jinzhai station's lithology is gneiss, the surface layer is relatively broken, so its barometric pressure response amplitude is the smallest, indicating that the overburden rock mass elasticity is poor.

eastern Dabie orogenic belt periphery  /  cave strain  /  barometric pressure effect
林俊, 吕品姬. 东大别造山带周缘洞体应变观测与气压效应. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2025 , 45 (2) : 195 -202 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.03.093
Jun LIN, Pinji LÜ. Cave Strain Observation and Barometric Pressure Effect around Eastern Dabie Orogenic Belt[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2025 , 45 (2) : 195 -202 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.03.093
  • The Spark Program of Earthquake Technology of CEA(XH24029C)
  • Combination Project with Monitoring, Prediction and Scientific Research of Earthquake Technology, CEA(3JH-202301057)
  • Open Fund of Wuhan Gravitation and Solid Earth Tides, National Observation and Research Station(WHYWZ202215)
Year 2025 volume 45 Issue 2
17
6
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.03.093
  • Receive Date:2024-03-06
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2025-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2024-03-06
Funding
The Spark Program of Earthquake Technology of CEA(XH24029C)
Combination Project with Monitoring, Prediction and Scientific Research of Earthquake Technology, CEA(3JH-202301057)
Open Fund of Wuhan Gravitation and Solid Earth Tides, National Observation and Research Station(WHYWZ202215)
Affiliations
    1 Hubei Earthquake Agency, 48 Hongshance Road, Wuhan 430071, China
    2 Wuhan Gravitation and Solid Earth Tides, National Observation and Research Station, 40 Hongshance Road, Wuhan 430071, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ddcl/EN/10.14075/j.jgg.2024.03.093
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT