收藏切换
Performance Evaluation of Ionospheric Correction Models in China
收藏切换
Yi YANG1, 2, Qi LIU1, 2, 3, Li YANG1, 2, 3, *, Jinpeng REN1, 2, Kai ZHAO1, 2, Mengxiang WANG1, 2, Keqi SU1, 2
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(2) : 220 - 226
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(2): 220-226
Performance Evaluation of Ionospheric Correction Models in China
Full
Yi YANG1, 2, Qi LIU1, 2, 3, Li YANG1, 2, 3, *, Jinpeng REN1, 2, Kai ZHAO1, 2, Mengxiang WANG1, 2, Keqi SU1, 2
Affiliations
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Spatial Datum, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • 2 School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
  • 3 Henan Industrial Technology Academy of Spatiotemporal Big Data (Henan University), Zhengzhou 450046, China
Published: 2026-02-15 doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.077
Outline
收藏切换

Using 60 days of observational data from 233 monitoring stations of the crustal movement observation network of China (CMONOC) in 2023, the ionospheric delay modeling accuracy and standard point positioning (SPP) accuracy of BDGIM, Klobuchar, NeQuickG and BDSBAS models are analyzed. The results show that the BDSBAS ionospheric correction has the highest accuracy, with the ionospheric delay residual error of 1.0 m and an average correction rate of 87% within the region, and 68% of the 3D positioning errors reaching 1.95 m. The NeQuickG and BDGIM models have similar performance, with the ionospheric delay residual error of 2.0 m and an average correction rate of 73%, and positioning accuracy of 2.59 m and 2.82 m, respectively. The Klobuchar model has a correction rate of 67% and a positioning accuracy of 4.35 m. For single frequency users within China, the BDSBAS ionospheric model is recommended as the first choice, followed by the BDGIM model, which has a relatively simpler algorithm and better accuracy.

ionospheric model  /  BDGIM  /  Klobuchar  /  NeQuickG  /  BDSBAS  /  performance evaluation
杨艺, 刘琦, 杨力, 任金鹏, 赵凯, 王梦祥, 苏柯淇. 中国区域广播电离层模型改正性能评估. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2026 , 46 (2) : 220 -226 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.077
Yi YANG, Qi LIU, Li YANG, Jinpeng REN, Kai ZHAO, Mengxiang WANG, Keqi SU. Performance Evaluation of Ionospheric Correction Models in China[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2026 , 46 (2) : 220 -226 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.077
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 2
26
10
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.077
  • Receive Date:2025-03-12
  • Online Date:2026-10-29
  • Published:2026-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-12
Funding
Affiliations
    1 State Key Laboratory of Spatial Datum, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    2 School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Henan University, Zhengzhou 450046, China
    3 Henan Industrial Technology Academy of Spatiotemporal Big Data (Henan University), Zhengzhou 450046, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ddcl/EN/10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.077
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT