收藏切换
Weighting Schemes for Multi-Source Time-Variable Gravity Field Model Fusion
收藏切换
Peng YAO1, Xingfu ZHANG1, *, Jianhao XUAN2, Xu YU1
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(8) : 957 - 963
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(8): 957-963
Weighting Schemes for Multi-Source Time-Variable Gravity Field Model Fusion
Full
Peng YAO1, Xingfu ZHANG1, *, Jianhao XUAN2, Xu YU1
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • 2 College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Published: 2026-08-15 doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.12.430
Outline
收藏切换

Time-variable gravity field models provide critical data support for monitoring large-scale surface mass changes. However, discrepancies in accuracy exist among models released by different institutions. To fully utilize the advantages of multi-source time-variable gravity field models, this study focuses on weighted fusion methods, investigating various weighting strategies, including variance component estimation (VCE), ocean noise RMS-based weighting, and degree variance-based weighting (incorporating two reference models). Time-variable gravity field models released by eight institutions worldwide, including HUST, were selected for fusion experiments and accuracy assessment. The results indicate: 1) The choice of weighting schemes across different degrees/orders influences the VCE fusion outcomes. When truncated to degree 90, the optimal weighting orders are 70 for GRACE models and 60 for GRACE-FO models. 2) All four weighting fusion schemes enhance model accuracy. Compared to the Tongji model, the pre-filtering degree-variance fusion (using the GOCO06s reference model) reduces ocean noise RMS by up to 23%, while the post-filtering VCE fusion achieves a maximum reduction of 29%. 3) Over six major river basins, the terrestrial water storage trends derived from different time-variable models show good consistency, and the fusion models exhibit higher correlation coefficients with Mascon solutions.

multi-source time-variable gravity field  /  weighting schemes  /  model fusion  /  accuracy analysis  /  weighted fusion method
姚鹏, 张兴福, 禤键豪, 余旭. 多源时变重力场模型融合的不同定权方法研究. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2026 , 46 (8) : 957 -963 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.12.430
Peng YAO, Xingfu ZHANG, Jianhao XUAN, Xu YU. Weighting Schemes for Multi-Source Time-Variable Gravity Field Model Fusion[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2026 , 46 (8) : 957 -963 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.12.430
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 8
34
13
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.12.430
  • Receive Date:2025-12-08
  • Online Date:2026-10-30
  • Published:2026-08-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-12-08
Funding
Affiliations
    1 School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
    2 College of Surveying and Geo-Informatics, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ddcl/EN/10.14075/j.jgg.2025.12.430
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT