收藏切换
Comparative Analysis of GRACE RL06.3 Time-Variable Gravity Field Models
收藏切换
Jinhui ZHANG1, Shanshan LI1, *, Haopeng FAN1, Diao FAN1
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(2) : 234 - 243
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2026, 46(2): 234-243
Comparative Analysis of GRACE RL06.3 Time-Variable Gravity Field Models
Full
Jinhui ZHANG1, Shanshan LI1, *, Haopeng FAN1, Diao FAN1
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Surveying and Mapping, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
Published: 2026-02-15 doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.060
Outline
收藏切换

We conduct a comparative analysis of RL06.3 time-variable gravity field models released by CSR, GFZ, and JPL, focusing on the degree one, C20 and C30 and their surface mass anomalies, mean degree variances, signal-to-noise ratios of global surface mass changes, and terrestrial water storage changes in typical regions. The results show that degree one, C20 and their surface mass anomalies of three models exhibit significant differences in trend but little differences in annual terms. For the C30, the trend shows considerable differences, while the annual terms are largely consistent. The C20 and C30 of RL06.3 models from the same institution with different truncation degrees have little impact on the trend and annual terms, but the differences between institutions are notable, particularly in the trend. The mean degree variances of three models are highly consistent in low-degree terms, while CSR RL06.3 shows the most gradual rise in noise fitting curves for high-degree terms. The terrestrial water storage inversion results from three models tend to be consistent, but the CSR and JPL models exhibit superior performance in terms of inversion accuracy and consistency. Conversely, the GFZ model generally presents a higher degree of uncertainty in its inversion results. When inverting terrestrial water storage changes, if the uncertainty of results is disregarded, it is recommended to use the GRACE time-variable gravity field models with higher truncation orders released by CSR or JPL. Otherwise, it is advisable to use the GRACE time-variable gravity field models with lower truncation orders released by CSR.

GRACE  /  time-variable gravity field model  /  RL06.3 model
张金辉, 李姗姗, 范昊鹏, 范雕. GRACE RL06.3时变重力场模型比较分析. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2026 , 46 (2) : 234 -243 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.060
Jinhui ZHANG, Shanshan LI, Haopeng FAN, Diao FAN. Comparative Analysis of GRACE RL06.3 Time-Variable Gravity Field Models[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2026 , 46 (2) : 234 -243 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.060
Year 2026 volume 46 Issue 2
41
16
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.060
  • Receive Date:2025-03-03
  • Online Date:2026-10-29
  • Published:2026-02-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-03
Funding
Affiliations
    1 School of Surveying and Mapping, Information Engineering University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ddcl/EN/10.14075/j.jgg.2025.03.060
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT