Home Journals Articles Updates About
CN
image
收藏切换
Construction of Gravity Field Order Selection Models for Dynamic Orbit Determination of Highly Elliptical Orbit Spacecraft
收藏切换
Xiangtai MA1, Yanfeng HU2, Fan ZHANG3, Shaopeng MA4
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2025, 45(12) : 1221 - 1225, 1233
Less
收藏切换
Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics | 2025, 45(12): 1221-1225, 1233
Construction of Gravity Field Order Selection Models for Dynamic Orbit Determination of Highly Elliptical Orbit Spacecraft
Full
Xiangtai MA1, Yanfeng HU2, Fan ZHANG3, Shaopeng MA4
Affiliations
  • 1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Suqian University, 399 South-Huanghe Road, Suqian 223800, China
  • 2 School of Astronautics, Space Engineering University, 1 Bayi Road, Beijing 101416, China
  • 3 Shandong GEO-Surveying and Mapping Institute, 11101 East-Erhuan Road, Jinan 250002, China
  • 4 Institute of Geographical Sciences, Hebei Academy of Sciences/Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Geographic Information Application, 80 Fanxi Road, Shijiazhuang 050011, China

    • MA Xiangtai, PhD, lecturer, majors in orbit determination of high-orbit spacecraft, E-mail:

About Author:

MA Xiangtai, PhD, lecturer, majors in orbit determination of high-orbit spacecraft, E-mail:

Published: 2025-12-15 doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.12.562
Outline
收藏切换

This study investigates the issue of using different gravity field model orders for the varying altitudes of highly elliptical orbits(HEOs). Using the gravity field optimization recursive algorithm, 54 circular orbits with different orbital altitudes were integrated with gravity field models of different orders for 6 hours and their errors were statistically analyzed. Four gravity field order selection models, including polynomial, power function, rational number approximation and piecewise selection, were constructed.The four HEOs in the lunar exploration project were simulated for experimental verification. The integration time for the four models decreased from 13-15 seconds to 2-3 seconds, significantly enhancing computational efficiency, with the integration times of the four selection models being close to each other.The polynomial fitting model achieved the highest integration accuracy among the four selection models, with the accuracy of the four HEOs using the polynomial fitting model being 55.25%, 95.88%, 77.33%, and 76.23% higher than that of the piecewise selection model, respectively.

highly elliptical orbit  /  dynamic orbit determination  /  gravity field order  /  gravity field model
马祥泰, 胡彦逢, 张帆, 马少鹏. 高椭圆轨道航天器动力学定轨重力场阶次选择模型构建. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2025 , 45 (12) : 1221 -1225, 1233 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.12.562
Xiangtai MA, Yanfeng HU, Fan ZHANG, Shaopeng MA. Construction of Gravity Field Order Selection Models for Dynamic Orbit Determination of Highly Elliptical Orbit Spacecraft[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2025 , 45 (12) : 1221 -1225, 1233 . DOI: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.12.562
Funding
Less
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China(42174044)
Appendix
Less
Year 2025 volume 45 Issue 12
37
17
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.14075/j.jgg.2024.12.562
  • Receive Date：2024-12-17
  • Online Date：2026-10-29
  • Published：2025-12-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received：2024-12-17
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China(42174044)
Affiliations
    1 School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Suqian University, 399 South-Huanghe Road, Suqian 223800, China
    2 School of Astronautics, Space Engineering University, 1 Bayi Road, Beijing 101416, China
    3 Shandong GEO-Surveying and Mapping Institute, 11101 East-Erhuan Road, Jinan 250002, China
    4 Institute of Geographical Sciences, Hebei Academy of Sciences/Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Geographic Information Application, 80 Fanxi Road, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ddcl/EN/10.14075/j.jgg.2024.12.562
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family		 属数
Number of
genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)		 属
Genus		 种数
Number of
species		 占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT
Links
Articles
Latest Articles
Most Read
Collections
Updates
Events
News
Multimedia
About
About Us
Contact
No. 86 Xueyuan South Road, Haidian District, Beijing
100081
010-62662699(Operation and Technical Support)
qkjq@cast.org.cn

Copyright © 2025 China Association for Science and Technology. All rights reserved. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.
Sponsored by the Office of the Leading Group for Cybersecurity and Informatization of CAST, and supported by Science and Technology Review Publishing House