收藏切换
Assessment of Grassland Ecological Restoration in the Xinjiang Grazing Withdrawal and Grassland Restoration Project Area
收藏切换
Acta Agrestia Sinica | 2026, 34(5) : 1852 - 1866
Less
收藏切换
Acta Agrestia Sinica | 2026, 34(5): 1852-1866
Assessment of Grassland Ecological Restoration in the Xinjiang Grazing Withdrawal and Grassland Restoration Project Area
Full
HUANG Lu1, DU Yi-qian1, YANG Xiu-chun1
Affiliations
    1 School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.026
Outline
收藏切换
Grasslands play a vital role in safeguarding ecological security and sustaining ecosystem functions. Xinjiang hosts some of China’s most abundant grassland resources. However, under the combined impacts of climate change and human activities, grassland degradation has become increasingly prominent in recent years. To comprehensively assess the current status and degree of ecological restoration in the Xinjiang “Grazing Withdrawal and Grassland Restoration” project areas, we evaluated ecosystem structure, ecosystem quality, and ecosystem services by integrating the InVEST and RUSLE models to quantify restoration outcomes. The results show that: (1) In terms of ecosystem quality, net primary productivity (NPP) increased from 190.96 g·m-2·a-1 in 2003 to 205.34 g·m-2·a-1 in 2021, and fractional vegetation cover (FVC) continued to rise, with improving areas accounting for 69.78% of the total areas. (2) Regarding ecosystem services, water conservation increased from 98.2 mm during 2003-2015 to 121.1 mm during 2015-2021. Soil retention increased from 273.74 to 283.61 t·hm-2, while windbreak and sand-fixation capacity changed from 2.82 to 3.62 t·hm-2. (3) The ecological restoration index (ERI) indicated that high-restoration areas (ERI>0.5) accounted for 19.08% of the study areas, whereas low-restoration areas (ERI≤0.2) represented only 0.02%. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support ecological protection and management in the project areas, facilitating zoned, graded, and differentiated ecological restoration strategies.
Grazing withdrawal  /  Ecosystem quality  /  Ecosystem services  /  Degree of ecological restoration
黄露, 杜毅倩, 杨秀春. 新疆退牧还草工程区草地生态恢复效果评价. 草地学报, 2026 , 34 (5) : 1852 -1866 . DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.026
HUANG Lu, DU Yi-qian, YANG Xiu-chun. Assessment of Grassland Ecological Restoration in the Xinjiang Grazing Withdrawal and Grassland Restoration Project Area[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026 , 34 (5) : 1852 -1866 . DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.026
Year 2026 volume 34 Issue 5
96
21
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.026
  • Receive Date:2025-04-21
  • Online Date:2026-09-23
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-04-21
  • Revised:2025-07-13
Affiliations
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.026
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT