收藏切换
Inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder approach to densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes: Discovery of an autophagy regulator
收藏切换
PDF
Jiulong Lia, b, Pengxin Rena, b, Lin Wangc, Yuting Zhangc, Peng Yanga, Weiwei Hec, Ang Lib
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(5) : 111381
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(5): 111381
• Communication •
Inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder approach to densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes: Discovery of an autophagy regulator
Full
Jiulong Lia, b, Pengxin Rena, b, Lin Wangc, Yuting Zhangc, Peng Yanga, Weiwei Hec, Ang Lib
Affiliations
  • aCollege of Chemistry & Henan Institute of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • bState Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
  • cShanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
About Author:

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiulong Li: Writing – original draft, Investigation.

Pengxin Ren: Investigation.

Lin Wang: Investigation.

Yuting Zhang: Investigation.

Peng Yang: Writing – original draft, Supervision.

Weiwei He: Writing – original draft, Supervision.

Ang Li: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Published: 2026-05-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111381
Outline
收藏切换

Natural products bearing a bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane motif pose a considerable challenge to chemical synthesis. We developed a europium-promoted inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder reaction of benzo[2,3]tropone derivatives with electron-rich olefins, which offers an expeditious approach to densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes. This method enabled the concise synthesis of a tetracyclic amine, subsequently identified as a downstream suppressor of autophagy.

Bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane  /  Benzo[2,3]tropone  /  Inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder reaction  /  Autophagy regulation
Jiulong Li, Pengxin Ren, Lin Wang, Yuting Zhang, Peng Yang, Weiwei He, Ang Li. Inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder approach to densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes: Discovery of an autophagy regulator[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026 , 37 (5) : 111381 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111381
The three-dimensional structural motifs of natural products [1] are increasingly recognized for their significance in chemical biology [2,3] and drug discovery [4]. Polycyclic natural products containing a bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane motif (highlighted in red in Fig. 1) [5–7], such as goupiolone B [5], phleghenrine A [6], and acremoxanthone A [7] (1–3, Fig. 1), present a formidable challenge to chemical synthesis. A variety of methods have been developed to construct such a structural motif in natural products and related compounds [8–17]. However, many of them involve multi-step sequences [8–13]. Strategically, the intermolecular Diels–Alder cycloaddition of tropone derivatives and olefins (highlighted in blue in Fig. 1) offers a desirable approach for assembling bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes [15–17]. Benzo[2,3]tropones [18] would be advantageous substrates for the [4 + 2] cycloaddition [19,20] because they are not prone to undesired [6 + 4] or [8 + 2] cycloaddition [21,22] compared to standard tropones. However, most reported examples are indeed formal [4 + 2] reactions [5,23–25] proceeding via enolate intermediates, which limit the applicability [5,24] and sometimes result in unsatisfactory efficiency [25]. To our knowledge, the inverse-electron-demand Diels–Alder (IEDDA) reaction [26,27] involving benzo[2,3]tropones remains largely unexplored. Following our continued interest in the Diels–Alder cycloaddition for complex molecule synthesis [28–36], we initiated an investigation into the IEDDA reaction of benzo[2,3]tropone-type dienes with electron-rich dienophiles and explored its application in the synthesis of polycyclic natural products and biologically active molecules, particularly autophagy regulators [37,38] and cell cycle inhibitors [39,40]. Herein, we report the assembly of densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes via such a cycloaddition reaction, which leads to the discovery of an autophagy suppressor.
We first explored the cycloaddition of 6-methoxycarbonylbenzo[2,3]tropone (4) and cyclopentadiene (5) (Table 1). Notably, Ghosh and co-workers demonstrated that benzo[2,3]tropone acted as a dienophile in a normal-electron-demand Diels–Alder (NEDDA) reaction with 5 [41]. Introducing the methoxycarbonyl group would not only provide a functional handle for further derivatization of the product(s), but also enhance the dienic reactivity of benzo[2,3]tropone in the IEDDA reaction. To our delight, thermal treatment of 4 and 5 at 80 ℃ afforded the desired cycloadducts (6a and 6b) in a ca. 18:1 ratio (entry 1), with a strong preference for the endo product. The position of the C═C bond within the cyclopentene ring of each product was determined by X-ray crystallographic analysis (Table 1). The excellent endo selectivity may be attributable to secondary orbital interactions [42]. Despite complete suppression of the NEDDA reaction (Table 1), a substantial portion of 4 was recovered, which resulted in reduced efficiency of the IEDDA reaction (entry 1). Thus, we turned to Lewis acids to lower the LUMO energy of 4. As shown in Table 1 (entries 2–4), BF3·OEt2, Me2AlCl, and Bi(OTf)3 significantly increased the dienic reactivity of 4 but concomitantly compromised the endo/exo selectivity. Our experience with lanthanide-mediated Diels–Alder cycloaddition [29,32,36] prompted us to examine europium-based promoters for this reaction. Eu(OTf)3 improved both efficiency and selectivity (entry 5), while Eu(fod)3 rendered the optimal results (92% combined yield, endo: exo > 20:1) (entry 6). Switching the solvent from CH2Cl2 to THF markedly reduced the yield of the desired products (entry 7).
Having established the optimal conditions, we investigated the substrate scope of the IEDDA reaction (Table 2). As shown in entries 1–4, the cycloaddition of 4 with various cyclic dienes demonstrated high endo selectivity. 6,6-Dimethylfulvene (7) performed well in this reaction; cycloadducts 8a and 8b (ca. 10:1) were isolated in 82% combined yield (entry 1). Despite steric hindrance, TMS-cyclopentadiene (9) reacted smoothly with 4 to afford compound 10 as the sole detectable diastereomer in 67% yield (entry 2). Retention of the TMS group in 10 supported a concerted rather than a stepwise mechanism. 1,2,3,4-Tetramethyl-1,3-cyclopentadiene (11) could equilibrate in situ to its positional isomer through a [1,5]-H shift [32,43], which subsequently underwent cycloaddition to form 12, a remarkably crowded tetracyclic compound, in 44% yield (entry 3). The IEDDA reaction between 1-siloxycyclohexadiene 13 and 4 afforded 14a and 14b (ca. 6:1) in 90% combined yield (entry 4). Due to the lower reactivity of mono-alkenes, the stronger promoter Bi(OTf)3 was required for their cycloaddition with 4 (entries 5 and 6). For cyclopentene (15), the exo product (16) was obtained as the single detectable diastereomer in 66% yield (entry 5). For norbornene (17), a mixture of the exo and endo products (18a and 18b; ca. 2:1) was isolated in 68% yield (entry 6). Notably, two analogs of 4 (19 and 20), bearing different substituents on the benzene ring, underwent smooth cycloaddition with 5 to give endo products 21 and 22, respectively, as single diastereoisomers (entries 7 and 8). The structures of 12, 16, 18a, and a derivative of 14a were confirmed by X-ray crystallographic analysis (Fig. 2).
We further derivatized the obtained bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane-containing compounds to identify biologically active candidates. A representative example is illustrated in Scheme 1. Selective epoxidation of 6a with m-CPBA in the presence of NaHCO3 afforded compound 23 in 72% yield. Acidic hydrolysis of the epoxide, followed by oxidative cleavage of the resulting diol with aqueous NaIO4, provided bis-aldehyde 24, which underwent double reductive amination [BnNH2, NaBH3CN, HOAc] to furnish tetracyclic amine 25 in 74% overall yield.
In light of our sustained interest in modulating autophagy with small molecules [37,38], we evaluated the effect of the above compounds on autophagic flux. The autophagy marker microtubule-associated protein light chain 3B (LC3B) [44,45] was analyzed in human lung carcinoma cells (A549) by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 3A, compound 25 induced a dose-dependent increase in the levels of LC3B-II, the phosphatidylethanolamine-conjugated form of LC3B, which pointed to this compound as a potential regulator of autophagy. To investigate whether compound 25 stimulates autophagy upstream or inhibits it downstream, we compared LC3B-II levels in A549 cells treated with 25 alone versus those co-treated with 25 and the autophagy inducer rapamycin (RAPA) [44,45]. The co-treatment significantly increased LC3B-II levels (Fig. 3B), which suggested a suppressive role for this compound in downstream autophagy. Autophagic flux was further assessed by using mCherry–eGFP–LC3B [46], a tandem fluorescent protein-tagged LC3 reporter. In A549 cells expressing this reporter, the fluorescence pattern of LC3B-positive puncta revealed that treatment with 25 led to an accumulation of autophagosomes and a reduction in autolysosomes (Fig. 3C), which indicated that this compound inhibits autophagy at a downstream stage. These findings highlight this compound as a promising chemical scaffold for developing autophagy modulators [47].
In conclusion, we developed a facile IEDDA approach to densely substituted bicyclo[3.2.2]nonanes, which enabled the discovery of an autophagy regulator. Exploration of the synthesis of bicyclo[3.2.2]nonane-containing natural products via this method is currently underway in our laboratories.
1
T.P. Stockdale, C.M. Williams, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 7737–7763.
2
G. Karageorgis, D.J. Foley, L. Laraia, S. Brakmann, H. Waldmann, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 15705–15723.
3
M. Grigalunas, S. Brakmann, H. Waldmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 3314–3329.
4
A.G. Atanasov, S.B. Zotchev, V.M. Dirsch, C.T. Supuran, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 20 (2021) 200–216.
5
Y. Matsuo, A. Yoshida, Y. Saito, T. Tanaka, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 11855–11859.
6
L.B. Dong, X.D. Wu, X. Shi, et al., Org. Lett. 18 (2016) 4498–4501.
7
M. Isaka, S. Palasarn, P. Auncharoen, S. Komwijit, E.B.G. Jones, Tetrahedron Lett. 50 (2009) 284–287.
8
J.M. Duffault, F. Tellier, Synth. Commun. 28 (1998) 2467–2481.
9
S.A. Kelly, Y. Foricher, J. Mann, J.M. Bentley, Org. Biomol. Chem. 1 (2003) 2865–2876.
10
Y. Hirano, K. Tokudome, H. Takikawa, K. Suzuki, Synlett 28 (2017) 214–220.
11
M.A. Corsello, J. Kim, N.K. Garg, Nat. Chem. 9 (2017) 944–949.
12
S.D. Holmbo, S.V. Pronin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 5065–5068.
13
Z.H. Shen, S.Y. Lu, J.Y. Zheng, et al., Front. Chem. 10 (2022) 1022533.
14
T. Tabuchi, D. Urabe, M. Inoue, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 9 (2013) 655–663.
15
K.R. Dahnke, L.A. Paquette, J. Org. Chem. 59 (1994) 885–899.
16
P. Li, H. Yamamoto, Chem. Commun. 46 (2010) 6294–6295.
17
P.J. Gritsch, I. Gimennez-Nueno, L. Wonilowicz, R. Sarpong, J. Org. Chem. 84 (2019) 8717–8723.
18
A. Dastan, H. Kilic, N. Saracoglu, Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 14 (2018) 1120–1180.
19
H.H. Rennhard, G.D. Modica, W. Simon, E. Heilbronner, A. Eschenmoser, Helv. Chim. Acta 40 (1957) 957–968.
20
A. Hassner, D. Middlemiss, J. Murry-Rust, P. Murry-Rust, Tetrahedron 38 (1982) 2539–2546.
21
J.H. Rigby, Org. React. 49 (1996) 331–425.
22
V. Nair, K.G. Abhilash, Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 13 (2008) 173–200.
23
Y. Sugimura, K. Iino, H. Kuwano, N. Soma, Y. Kishida, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 20 (1972) 2515–2521.
24
Y. Mu, Q. Yao, L. Yin, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 6755–6764.
25
F.M. Hauser, H. Yin, Org. Lett. 2 (2000) 1045–1047.
26
Z.M. Png, H. Zeng, Q. Ye, J. Xu, Chem. Asian J. 12 (2017) 2142–2159.
27
J. Zhang, V. Shukla, D.L. Boger, J. Org. Chem. 84 (2019) 9397–9445.
28
J. Deng, B. Zhu, Z. Lu, H. Yu, A. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134 (2012) 920–923.
29
J. Deng, S. Zhou, W. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 8185–8188.
30
J. Li, P. Yang, M. Yao, J. Deng, A. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 16477–16480.
31
M. Yang, J. Li, A. Li, Nat. Commun. 6 (2015) 6445.
32
W. Zhang, M. Ding, J. Li, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 4227–4231.
33
S. Zhou, R. Guo, P. Yang, A. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 9025–9029.
34
S. Zhou, K. Xia, X. Leng, A. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 13718–13723.
35
J. Li, Y. Ma, X. Zhang, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 32 (2021) 700–702.
36
S. Liu, J. Wang, Y. Ma, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 33 (2022) 2041–2043.
37
Y. Wu, S. Wang, Z. Guo, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 121 (2024) e2400809121.
38
S. Wang, Y. Wu, M. Ba, et al., Synlett (2024), doi:10.1055/a-2325-3938.
39
J. Pei, S. Zhou, F. Yang, et al., Chem. Asian J. 11 (2016) 2715–2718.
40
Y. Peng, Y. Zhang, R. Fang, et al., Adv. Sci. 11 (2024) 2305593.
41
S. Sarkar, G. Saha, S. Ghosh, J. Org. Chem. 57 (1992) 5771–5773.
42
D. Ginsburg, Tetrahedron 39 (1983) 2095–2135.
43
C.W. Spangler, Chem. Rev. 76 (1976) 187–217.
44
N. Mizushima, L.O. Murphy, Trends Biochem. Sci. 45 (2020) 1080–1093.
45
D.J. Klionsky, A.K. Abdel-Aziz, S. Abdelfatah, et al., Autophagy 17 (2021) 1–382.
46
S. Kimura, T. Noda, T. Yoshimori, Autophagy 3 (2007) 452–460.
47
T. Whitmarsh-Everiss, L. Laraia, Nat. Chem. Biol. 17 (2021) 653–664.
Year 2026 volume 37 Issue 5
PDF
61
35
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111381
  • Receive Date:2025-03-24
  • Online Date:2026-10-29
  • Published:2026-05-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-24
  • Revised:2025-05-22
  • Accepted:2025-05-26
Affiliations
    aCollege of Chemistry & Henan Institute of Advanced Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
    bState Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China
    cShanghai Key Laboratory of New Drug Design, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China

Corresponding:

*

E-mail addresses: (P. Yang)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111381
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT