收藏切换
Rapid discovery and biomimetic syntheses of two unusual hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts from Brucea javanica
收藏切换
PDF
Zhi-Kang Duan, Mei-Ya Lian, Shu-Hui Dong, Ming Bai, Xiao-Xiao Huang, Shao-Jiang Song
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(1) : 111321
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(1): 111321
• Communication •
Rapid discovery and biomimetic syntheses of two unusual hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts from Brucea javanica
Full
Zhi-Kang Duan, Mei-Ya Lian, Shu-Hui Dong, Ming Bai, Xiao-Xiao Huang, Shao-Jiang Song
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Computational Chemistry-Based Natural Antitumor Drug Research & Development, Liaoning Province; Engineering Research Center of Natural Medicine Active Molecule Research & Development, Key Laboratory of Natural Bioactive Compounds Discovery & Modification, School of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China
About Author:

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhi-Kang Duan: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Mei-Ya Lian: Software, Investigation, Formal analysis.

Shu-Hui Dong: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Software, Data curation.

Ming Bai: Writing – review & editing.

Xiao-Xiao Huang: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Formal analysis.

Shao-Jiang Song: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Data curation.

Published: 2026-01-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111321
Outline
收藏切换

The first hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts, bruquass A and B (1 and 2), were rapidly isolated and identified from Brucea javanica using an integrated analytical strategy. They possessed unusual carbon skeletons formed by the coupling of quassinoids with hemiterpene units via vinylogous aldol reactions. Their structural configurations were determined through comprehensive spectroscopic analysis and electronic circular dichroism (ECD) calculations. Plausible biosynthetic pathways for 1 and 2 were proposed, and guided by these biogenetic insights, the biomimetic synthesis of compound 1 was successfully achieved. Furthermore, compounds 1 and 2 exhibited significant antifeedant activity against Plutella xylostella. The bioactivity assessment results open up the prospects of 1 and 2 as a promising new class of botanical insecticide.

Hemiterpene-quassinoid adduct  /  Brucea javanica  /  Target isolation  /  Biomimetic synthesis  /  Antifeedant
Zhi-Kang Duan, Mei-Ya Lian, Shu-Hui Dong, Ming Bai, Xiao-Xiao Huang, Shao-Jiang Song. Rapid discovery and biomimetic syntheses of two unusual hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts from Brucea javanica[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026 , 37 (1) : 111321 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111321
Quassinoids represent a class of nortriterpene compounds, which are commonly recognized as characteristic metabolites of the Simaroubaceae family [1–5]. Structurally, these compounds typically feature a pentacyclic or tetracyclic lactone core and are categorized into six subtypes: C26, C25, C20, C19, C18, and C22 types [6]. To date, approximately 480 naturally occurring quassinoids have been identified, exhibiting a wide range of significant biological activities, such as antifeedant, antitumor, anti-inflammatory, and antimalarial effects [5,7–11]. As a prominent member of the Simaroubaceae family, Brucea javanica has garnered considerable research interest in recent decades for a variety of biologically active quassinoids [12–16]. Using advanced technological tools to help us rapidly and accurately identify quassinoids with novel skeletons in B. javanica, and expand the chemical diversity of quassinoids should be our primary focus.
Interdisciplinary studies crossing the natural sciences and computer science make it possible to effectively discover natural products with novel skeletons by utilizing the advanced technology [17]. Based on the rapid advance of information technology, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR)-based analytical techniques for complex chemical mixtures have substantially accelerated the identification of new natural products [18–25]. In parallel, tandem mass spectrometry-based molecular networking has also evolved to become a frequently used method. Such tools were indispensable for contemporary phytochemical research to efficiently identify structurally novel natural products with low natural abundance [26–31]. These technological advancements revolutionize natural product discovery, but their comparative advantages and limitations have gradually emerged in practical applications.
Considering the characteristics of every single strategy, we advance a new integrated analytical strategy based on DeepSAT and molecular networking. DeepSAT accurately extracts the chemical features to achieve structure annotation and scaffold prediction of major constituents but a relatively lower sensitivity in trace compound detection [18]. With MS/MS-based technology, its sensitivity dramatically increased over the DeepSAT method, and it precise localizes target compounds through molecular network mapping. Applying this approach, two novel hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts (bruquassins A and B, 1 and 2) with an unusual 5/6/6/6/6/5 hexacyclic scaffold were successfully identified from B. javanicaas (Fig. 1A). Encouragingly, these two compounds are the first reported examples of hemiterpene-quassinoid adducts. Herein, the guided isolation, structure elucidation, and hypothetical biogenetic pathways of 1 and 2 were described. Furthermore, we accomplished the biomimetic synthesis of 1 and evaluated the antifeedant activities of all these isolates against Plutella xylostella (DBM, the abbreviation of diamondback moth).
The residual alcohol extract of B. javanica was suspended in H2O, extracted with n-BuOH, and subsequently subjected to multiple chromatography, resulting in the isolation of four fractions (Fr. B1 to B4). The heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectrum and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) data of Fr. B1 to B4 from B. javanica were analyzed by the integrated analytical strategy to prioritize the identification of intriguing quassinoids. The HSQC data were formatted into a comma-separated values (CSV) file and subsequently uploaded to the DeepSAT platform (https://deepsat.ucsd.edu/) [18,23]. As shown in Fig. 1B, Fr. B4 has a 96.84% probability of being rich in triterpenoids, and the top six structures ranked by cosine similarity scores were all identified as quassinoids. It is worth noting that the low cosine similarity scores observed in the DeepSAT results suggested the presence of novel quassinoids skeletons in Fr. B4. Nevertheless, it is difficult to determine the location of potential quassinoids in Fr. B4 only by using DeepSAT. Therefore, to rapidly discover the possible novel quassinoids with low abundance, the GNPS workflow was chosen and applied [27,28,32,33]. In the generated molecular network (Fig. 1C), the main ingredient in B. javanica, bruceine A was initially identified [34]. Notably, the molecular network contained several nodes with molecular weights exceeding 600, approximately 100 Da higher than those of reported quassinoids [6], suggesting that these nodes were possible to possess complex quassinoids structures. Accordingly, guided by DeepSAT and molecular networking, two quassinoids with unparalleled skeletons were successfully isolated and characterized (Fig. 1A).
Bruquass A (1) was obtained as white amorphous powder with a chemical formula of C31H40O12 based on its HRESIMS ion peak at m/z 605.2590 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C31H41O12, 605.2593), accounting for twelve degrees of unsaturation. The 1D NMR (Table S1 in Supporting information) together with HSQC spectrum of 1 revealed resonances for six methyl groups, including one methoxy, four singlets, and one doublets; four sp3 methylene, including one oxygenated; eight sp3 methine, including four oxygenated; five sp3 quaternary carbons, including three oxygenated; four olefinic; an aldehyde group; and three ester groups. Based on the double bond equivalents, compound 1 possessed a six-ring framework. The 1H-1H correlation spectroscopy (COSY) correlations of H3-18/H-4/H-5/H2-6/H-7, H-9/H-11/H-12, H-14/H-15, and the heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) correlations from H3-18 to C-3, H3-19 to C-1/5/9/10, H2-17 to C-7/8/9, H-7 to C-14, H-11 to C-13, and H-12 to C-20 manifested the presence of quassinoid motif (Fig. 2A). Meanwhile, the existence of ring F and its fusion to ring A via C-2 and C-3 were inferred from the HMBC correlations of 2-OH to C-1/2/1′′, H3-3′′ to C-1′′/2′′/4′′, and H-5′′ to C-2/4′′. The assignment of the angeloyl group was done according to the double bond equivalents and the HMBC correlations from H3-4′/5′ to C-2′/3′. Hence, the planar structure of 1 was unequivocally elucidated.
The relative configuration of 1 was resolved via the nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) correlations. Based on the NOESY correlations (Fig. 2B) between H-5 and H-9, H-9 and H-15, H-9 and H-11, 2-OH and 3-OH, 2-OH and H3-19, H3-19 and H-4, H3-19 and H2-17, H2-17 and H-12, H2-17 and H-14, H2-17 and H-7, the relative configuration was partially assigned as 2R*,3S*,4S*,5S*,7R*,8R*,9R*,10S*,11R*,12S*,13S*,14S*,15R*. The absolute configurations of 1 was confirmed by time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)/ECD calculations [4,32,35–38]. Finally, The ECD curves generated for (2R,3S,4S,5S,7R,8R,9R,10S,11R,12S,13S,14S,15R)-1 agreed well with the experimental curves for 1, allowing the assignment of the absolute configuration of 1 as 2R,3S,4S,5S,7R,8R,9R,10S,11R,12S,13S,14S,15R (Fig. 2C). Conclusively, by the systematic analysis above, we could unquestionably determine the compound 1 as an unparalleled adduct of hemiterpene and quassinoid with 5/6/6/6/6/5 hexyclic ring system.
Bruquass B (2) was determined to have a molecular formula of C31H42O12, 2Da more than that of 1, according to its protonated molecular ion at m/z 607.2745 in its HRESIMS data (calcd. for C31H43O12, 607.2749). Comparison of the 1D and 2D NMR spectra of 2 with those of 1 revealed their similarity, expected that the angeloyl group in 1 was replaced by an isovaleric group (Fig. 2A). The relative configurations of 2 was further ascertained by NOESY experiment (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, the absolution configuration of 2 was ascertained to be 2R,3S,4S,5S,7R,8R,9R,10S,11R,12S,13S,14S,15R according to the matched ECD curves between the calculated and experiment one (Fig. 2C).
The biosynthetic pathway of 1 can plausibly be traced back to brusatol (3), existing in B. javanica at some level of abundant. As illustrated in Scheme 1A, intermediate Ⅰ was synthesized from brusatol (3) and 3-methyl-2-butenal (5) by aldol condensation [39]. Owing to the inherent instability of the enol structure, intermediate Ⅰ rapidly underwent tautomerization to its keto form (intermediate Ⅱ). Subsequently, the elimination of the γ-hydrogen atom generates a carbanion, with the resulting negative charge delocalized to the α-position [40]. Ultimately, compound 1 was formed via intramolecular Aldol condensation. Similarly, compound 2 was proposed to be biosynthesized through an analogous pathway, with bruceine A (4) serving as the precursor.
To provide a sufficient sample of 1 for biological evaluation and further accurate structural validation, a concise and viable biomimetic synthesis starting from brusatol (3) was designed based on the hypothetic biogenetic pathway of 1 (Scheme 1B). Considering that the formation of γ-carbanion was critical in synthesis of 1, we attempted to catalyze the reaction between 3 and 3-methyl-2-butenal (5) under different conditions [41–45]. the expected product 1 was not observed when acidic catalysts were employed (Table S2 in Supporting information, entries 1–4). By comparison, under basic catalytic conditions, the desired product 1 was successfully formed using sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide (Table S2, entries 5–8). Due to the presence of multiple ester bonds in the structure of 3, which are susceptible to decomposition under strong alkaline conditions, the subsequent reactions were carried out at 0 ℃ and the product 1 was formed in 16.9% yield (Table S2, entry 9). What is more, among the solvents screened, DMF proved to be the most effective (25.3% yield) for the reaction (Table S2, entry 10). In conclusion, the bionic synthesis of 1 was achieved by alkali-catalyzed vinylogous aldol condensation.
Guided by the biomimetic synthesis, sufficient compounds were prepared and purified to evaluate their antitumor activities. However, compounds 1 and 2 showed no cytotoxicity in HCT116, Caco-2, and HT-29 cell lines. In view of the antifeedant activity of quassinoids in B. javanica [16,46,47], the antifeedant activities against DBM of compounds 1 and 2 was screened by leaf disc method. The bioassay revealed significant concentration dependent antifeedant activity, with compound 1 exhibiting particularly potent effects (the concentration corresponding to 50% antifeedant action (AFC50) = 26.58 µg/mL). Following incubation with seeding of Brassica oleracea L. (Brassicaceae), compound 1 decreased the feeding of the DBM larvae on the leaves (Figs. 3A and C). After a 5-day culture period, the antifeedant index (AFI) remained above 70% after treatment with a high concentration (50 µg/mL) of compound 1 (Fig. 3B). In addition, the body size of the DBM larvae fed with compound 1 was significantly smaller and lighter than that of the control group (Fig. 3D).
In summary, we employed an integrated approach combining DeepSAT with tandem mass spectrometry-based molecular networking to search for novel bioactive quassinoid analogues from B. javanica. Guided by this approach, bruquass A and B (1 and 2), possessing unusual 5/6/6/6/6/5 hexyclic ring system, were identified as the first examples of quassinoid-hemiterpene hybrids. Their structure and absolute configurations were elucidated by comprehensive analysis of spectroscopic data and quantum chemical calculations. Notably, compound 1 was successfully synthesized and the corresponding optimal synthetic conditions were explored, processing sufficient compounds for biological experiments. Results of bioactivity study showed that the isolates exerted potent antifeedant activity on the Plutella xylostella. The discovery of these novel skeletal compounds not only enriches the structural diversity of quassinoids, but also furnishes promising candidates for the development of natural insecticides.
1
W.P. Thomas, S.V. Pronin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2021) 118–122.
2
C. Lu, S.N. Lu, D. Di, et al., Engineering 38 (2024) 27–38.
3
W.Y. Zhao, X.Y. Song, L. Zhao, et al., J. Nat. Prod. 82 (2019) 714–723.
4
Z.K. Duan, S.S. Guo, L. Ye, et al., Phytochemistry 215 (2023) 113858.
5
W.Q. Yang, X.H. Shao, F. et al., J. Nat. Prod. 83 (2020) 1674–1683.
6
Z.K. Duan, Z.J. Zhang, S.H. Dong, et al., Phytochemistry 187 (2021) 112769.
7
X. Yu, X. Shang, X. Huang, et al., Chin. Herb. Med. 12 (2020) 359–366.
8
C. He, Y. Wang, T. Yang, et al., J. Agric. Food. Chem. 68 (2020) 117–127.
9
X. Fan, Y. Han, L. Deng, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 71 (2023) 457–468.
10
N. Wei, J. Burrnett, D.L. Crocker, et al., Biochem. Pharmacol. 212 (2023) 115564.
11
X. Fang, Y.T. Di, Y. Zhang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54 (2015) 5592–5595.
12
K.W. Li, Y.Y. Liang, Q. Wang, et al., Phytomedicine 86 (2021) 153560.
13
X. He, J. Wu, T. Tan, et al., Fitoterapia 153 (2021) 104980.
14
X. Li, Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, et al., Biochem. Pharmacol. 223 (2024) 116197.
15
G. Yan, Q. Xiao, J. Zhao, et al., J. Control. Release 367 (2024) 422–440.
16
D. Chen, K. Li, B. Wang, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 71 (2023) 11491–11501.
17
S.H. Dong, Z.K. Duan, M. Bai, et al., TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 175 (2024) 117711.
18
H.W. Kim, C. Zhang, R. Reher, et al., J. Cheminf. 15 (2023) 71.
19
R. Reher, H.W. Kim, C. Zhang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142 (2020) 4114–4120.
20
H.W. Kim, C. Zhang, G.W. Cottrell, et al., Magn. Reson. Chem. 60 (2022) 1070–1075.
21
M. Bai, W. Xu, X. Zhang, et al., Phytochemistry 206 (2023) 113562.
22
Y. Du, L. Yao, X. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 34 (2023) 107512.
23
Z.K. Duan, X. Wang, M.Y. Lian, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 71 (2024) 10958–10969.
24
L. Flores-Bocanegra, Z.Y. Al Subeh, J.M. Egan, et al., J. Nat. Prod. 85 (2022) 614–624.
25
T. Huang, P. Chen, B. Liu, et al., Anal. Chem. 92 (2020) 10996–11006.
26
W.Y. Zhou, Z.H. Xi, N.N. Du, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2023) 109930.
27
R. Guo, Z.K. Duan, Q. Li, et al., Phytochemistry 206 (2023) 113523.
28
S.H. Dong, J.L. Han, X.Y. Chang, et al., Org. Chem. Front. 10 (2023) 4740–4749.
29
Q.F. He, Z.L. Wu, L. Li, et al., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 60 (2021) 19609–19613.
30
A.T. Aron, E.C. Gentry, K.L. McPhail, et al., Nat. Protoc. 15 (2020) 1954–1991.
31
J.X. Zhao, J.M. Yue, Sci. China Chem. 66 (2023) 928–942.
32
S.H. Dong, Z.K. Duan, Y.F. Ai, et al., Bioorg. Chem. 129 (2022) 106208.
33
W.Y. Zhou, J. Y. Hou, Q. Li, et al., Phytochemistry 204 (2022) 113468.
34
S.H. Matsuura, K. Takahashi, K. Nabeta, et al., J. Nat. Prod. 70 (2007) 1654–1657.
35
S.H. Dong, B. Lin, X.B. Xue, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 39 (2021) 337–344.
36
T.M. Lv, D.L. Chen, J.J. Liang, et al., Org. Lett. 23 (2021) 7231–7235.
37
C. Zhang, Y. Li, Z. Chu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108206.
38
A. Fu, C. Chen, Q. Li, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109100.
39
M.S. Kutwal, D. Sachin, A. Chandrakumar, Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 2509–2513.
40
A. Mondal, B. Satpathi, S.S.V. Ramasastry, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 256–261.
41
Y.J. Tsou, N. Sathishkumar, I.T. Chen, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 2250–2531.
42
J.A. Gazaille, J.A. Abramite, T. Sammakia, Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 178–181.
43
Y. Wang, R. Zhao, M. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 15033–15037.
44
C. Giovanni, Z. Franca, A. Giovanni, et al., Chem. Rev. 100 (2000) 1929–1972.
45
P. Chen, L. Liang, Y. Zhu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109229.
46
G. Mao, Y. Tian, Z. Sun, et al., Agric. Food Chem. 67 (2019) 4232–4239.
47
X.H. Yan, J. Chen, Y.T. Di, et al., J. Agric. Food. Chem. 58 (2010) 1572–1577.
Year 2026 volume 37 Issue 1
PDF
58
33
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111321
  • Receive Date:2025-03-19
  • Online Date:2026-10-28
  • Published:2026-01-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-19
  • Revised:2025-05-12
  • Accepted:2025-05-14
Affiliations
    Key Laboratory of Computational Chemistry-Based Natural Antitumor Drug Research & Development, Liaoning Province; Engineering Research Center of Natural Medicine Active Molecule Research & Development, Key Laboratory of Natural Bioactive Compounds Discovery & Modification, School of Traditional Chinese Materia Medica, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110016, China

Corresponding:

*

E-mail addresses: (X.-X. Huang)
(S.-J. Song)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111321
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT