收藏切换
Osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals with a delocalized unpaired electron
收藏切换
PDF
Bingjie Fua, Yue Zhaoa, Yang Lib, Wenfeng Jianga, Wei Baia
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(10) : 112281
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(10): 112281
• Communication •
Osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals with a delocalized unpaired electron
Full
Bingjie Fua, Yue Zhaoa, Yang Lib, Wenfeng Jianga, Wei Baia
Affiliations
  • aSchool of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
  • bSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124221, China
About Author:

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Bingjie Fu: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis.

Yue Zhao: Investigation, Formal analysis.

Yang Li: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Wenfeng Jiang: Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Wei Bai: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization.

Published: 2026-10-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112281
Outline
收藏切换

Substituted cyclopentadienyl (Cp) radicals, as well as other Cp and fluorenyl-based radicals, exhibit deviations from ideal fivefold D5h symmetric structures due to Jahn-Teller distortion. The unpaired electron is unequally distributed on the five carbons. Herein, we report the metalla-analogs of Cp radicals from one-electron reduction of antiaromatic osmacyclopentatriene complexes. The novel osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals are nonaromatic, with the single unpaired electron delocalized over the entire five-membered osmacycle. Furthermore, these osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals can be oxidized to regenerate osmacyclopentatrienes and reduced to form osmacyclopentadienes. This discovery provides new insights into radical chemistry and organometallic chemistry.

Antiaromaticity  /  Osmacyclopentatriene  /  Osmacyclopentadiene  /  Radical  /  Redox reaction
Bingjie Fu, Yue Zhao, Yang Li, Wenfeng Jiang, Wei Bai. Osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals with a delocalized unpaired electron[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026 , 37 (10) : 112281 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112281
Radical compounds are one important cornerstones of chemistry. Organic radicals are usually reactive due to their characteristic open-shell electronic structures, and the active unpaired electrons play crucial roles in molecular transformations and functional materials [1,2]. For example, nonaromatic porphyrinoid radicals have been isolated and characterized as the key structures in redox aromatic−antiaromatic switching [3–7]. Recently, Schulz and Haberhauer presented the synthesis of antiaromatic cyclopentadienyl (Cp) cation from the oxidation of Cp radical, which could be reduced to Cp anion [8]. The synthesis and structures of substituted Cp radicals have attracted attention for 100 years since the report of pentaphenyl one (C5Ph5) in 1925 by Ziegler and Schnell [9]. Crystallographic studies demonstrate that both symmetrically and asymmetrically substituted Cp radicals, as well as other Cp and fluorenyl-based radicals, exhibit deviations from ideal fivefold D5h symmetry (A, Fig. 1) [10–15], while some early works have disorder problems [16,17]. First-principles calculations reveal that Jahn-Teller distortion preferentially stabilizes the C2v symmetric structures (B and C, Fig. 1) [18,19]. The unpaired electron is not evenly delocalized over the five-membered ring, and the ring shows significant single and double C—C bond alternations [10–15].
The involvement of transition metals in conjugated ring system has shown the potentials for approaching fascinating structures. Recently, Xia group presented the aromatic in-plane [55555] metallo-annulene complexes wherein five aromatic rings share one central Os atom [20]. Both metallaaromatics [21], such as metallabenzene [22], metallabenzyne [23], metallapentalyne [24], spirometallole [25], and rare examples of metalla-antiaromatics [26–31], have been reported. The metalla-analogues of CpH (cyclopentadiene) and Cp- (cyclopentadienyl anion), such as metallacyclopentadienes [32] and dianion metalloles [33], are well-documented. By contrast, metalla-analog of Cp radicals are less developed, and the unpaired electrons are mainly localized [34–36]. In this work, we report the structure and characterization of the nonaromatic osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals as the first examples of one-electron reduction of antiaromatic metallacycles, which demonstrate unprecedent delocalization of the single unpaired electron (Fig. 1).
Complexes 2 were obtained from the mixture of corresponding antiaromatic osmacyclopentatriene complexes 1 [31], AgPF6 and acetonitrile (MeCN) in dichloromethane (DCM) at 40 ℃ (Fig. 2a). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that the cation 2b2+ (the metallacyclic dication of 2) also contained an osmacyclopentatriene unit (Figs. 2b and c) [31]. For example, the Os=C bond lengths in 2b2+ (1.942(6) Å and 1.936(5) Å) are slightly longer than those in complex 1a (1.927(10) Å and 1.924(11) Å). The C—C single bonds are almost identical (1.488(8) Å and 1.481(8) Å in 2b2+, and 1.489(12) Å and 1.488(12) Å in 1a), while the C═C double bond (1.354(8) Å) of 2b2+ is much shorter than that of 1a (1.377(13) Å) [31]. The NMR data of 2b are consistent with its solid structure. For instance, its 31P{1H} NMR spectrum shows a singlet at −7.7 ppm, confirming the two identical trans-oriented PPh3, and the septet at −144.3 ppm is from the counterion PF6-. In the 1H NMR spectrum, the signal of MeCN appears at 2.54 ppm, and the other resonances are all in the range of 7.22–7.96 ppm with well-resolved coupling patterns, which is indicative of a diamagnetic molecule and implies a good symmetry for 2b2+. The Os=C signal of 2b2+ is found at 237.8 ppm as a triplet (J(PC) = 10.1 Hz) in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum, which is downfield-shifted (by 8.8 ppm) compared with that of 1b. Complex 2a has similar NMR spectra (Figs. S22-S24 in Supporting information), and 2a and 2b are also characterized by the high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS, Figs. S34 and 35 in Supporting information), as well as elemental analysis (EA). Generally, the NMR data and structural parameters suggest that complexes 2 have similar polycyclic structures as 1. Meanwhile, their electronic structures and aromatic property are comparable, revealed by aftermentioned theoretical studies.
Upon exposure to reducing agents (CuI, Zn, or NaBH4), the reddish solution of complexes 2 underwent a rapid color change to green. Osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals 3 were precipitated out after counterion exchange with NaBPh4 (Fig. 2a). Complexes 3 were paramagnetic, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the structure of 3b As shown in Figs. 2b and c, 3b.+ (the metallacyclic cation of 3b) has a much more delocalized five-membered OsC5 ring. The Os–C bonds (1.998(4) Å and 1.995(4) Å) of 3b.+ are longer than those of 2b2+ and 1a, while the C–C bond lengths in the osmacycle (1.421(5) Å, 1.423(5) Å, and 1.399(5) Å) demonstrate a trend toward equalization. These Os-C and C—C bond distances of the OsC5 ring in 3b.+ obviously fall between those of characteristic osmacyclopentatriene 2b2+ and aftermentioned osmacyclopentadiene 4b. Electronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy was employed to characterize radicals 3 (Fig. 3a and Fig. S1a in Supporting information). Simulations yielded gx,y,z = 2.231, 2.112, 2.011 of 3a, and gx,y,z = 2.278, 2.115, 2.012 of 3b, indicating that the unpaired electron occupied dxz or dyz orbital of the Os metal center (Fig. S1b in Supporting information), and the dxz orbital contributed to the molecular π orbitals (aftermentioned theoretical studies). Their EPR spectra in DCM solution at room temperature were similar (Fig. S2 in Supporting information), showing only the signals of metal radical. The structural formula and purity of 3 have been confirmed by HRMS (Figs. S36 and S37 in Supporting information) and EA, respectively. When complexes 3 were treated with KPF6 and H2O2 (5 wt%), oxidation occurred with the regeneration of 2 (Fig. 2a).
Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed on model complex 3′ (simplified by replacing PPh3 with PH3) using the UB3LYP-D3BJ//def2-TZVP/6–311 G(2d,p) level of theory [37–40]. The optimized structure of 3′ accurately reproduced the key features of 3b.+ (Fig. S5 in Supporting information). The spin density analysis [41,42] showed that the single unpaired electron of 3′ is predominantly delocalized on the five atoms of the OsC4 unit (Fig. 3b). Spin population analysis was further carried out using Becke method [43], indicating nearly even distribution over the five atoms that the Os occupied 13.7% and the four carbons occupied 17.8% or 11.8% (Fig. 3c). NBO method [44,45] showed a consistent result with 13.1% to 19.4% spin population (Fig. 3c). The spin distributions of the remaining atoms were presented in Fig. S6 (Supporting information). The hyperfine splitting of C4 unit was unresolved in EPR spectra, probably due to the broad linewidths of Os signal [46–48]. For comparison, we optimized the two types of C2v symmetric substituted cyclopentadienyl radicals Cp-B and Cp-C reported in the literature (structures B and C, Fig. 1) [12], and calculated their spin density and spin population analysis by Becke method. As shown in Fig. S7 (Supporting information), the single unpaired electron of Cp-B is predominantly distributed on C1 (35.7%), and C3 (23.0%) and C4 (20.5%), while the single unpaired electron of Cp-C is predominantly distributed on the terminal carbons of the vinylic radical (C2 30.2%, C5 29.0%), consistent with the reported results. The delocalization of the single unpaired electron over the five-membered osmacycle in 3 is quite unique, in sharp contrast to previously reported aromatic [34,49] and non-aromatic [50] conjugated metallacycles containing single unpaired electron, which is mainly localized on the metal center.
It was found that the addition of a large excess of NaBH4 could further reduce complexes 3 with a color change from green to pale yellow. We investigated the reactions and complexes 4 were obtained from the reactions of 3 (or 2) with NaBH4 under carbon monoxide atmosphere (Fig. 2a), and their structures were determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. As shown in Figs. 2b and c, Figs. S20 and S21 (Supporting information), both 4a and 4b contain an osmacyclopentadiene unit and the Os center is coordinated with two equatorial CO and two axial PPh3 ligands. The Os-C bond lengths (2.107(7) Å and 2.137(7) Å for 4a, 2.118(3) Å for 4b) are in the range of the Os-C single bonds (1.977(2)-2.183(7) Å) in monocyclic osmacyclopentadiene complexes [51–54]. The C—C bonds (1.354(10) Å, 1.362(9) Å, and 1.453(10) Å for 4a, 1.371(4) Å and 1.460(5) Å for 4b) of the osmacycles show significant single and double bond alternations. The NMR data supports this solid structure. The Os-C═C of 4b is found at 180.2 ppm as a triplet (J(PC) = 10.1 Hz) in the 13C{1H} NMR spectrum, which is remarkably upfield-shifted compared with those of 2b and 1b. The CO signal is found at 184.9 ppm (t, J(PC) = 10.1 Hz). All the proton signals appear in the aromatic region of 7.53–6.75 ppm in the 1H NMR spectrum. The 31P{1H} NMR spectrum displays a singlet at −1.8 ppm. Complex 4a shows similar NMR spectra (Figs. S28-S30 in Supporting information), and they are also characterized by HRMS (Figs. S38 and S39 in Supporting information) and EA. The solids of complexes 2, 3, and 4 can be stored at ambient condition for three months without obvious change.
The nucleus-independent chemical shifts (NICS) [55–58] were calculated to evaluate the aromatic property of these metallapolycycles in model complexes 2′, 3′, and 4′, which are simplified from 2b2+, 3b.+, and 4b, respectively. The NICS(1)zz values of the fused benzene units (6MR) are all negative (Fig. 4), suggesting that they are aromatic. While the NICS(1)zz value of the osmacyclopentatriene ring of 2′ is 18.8 ppm, indicating its antiaromaticity like complex 1 [31]. Whereas the osmacyclopentatrienyl radical unit of 3′ and the osmacyclopentadiene unit of 4′ are nonaromatic as their NICS(1)zz values are 7.4 ppm and 3.0 ppm, respectively. From 2′ to 4′, the oxa-rings (5MR) turn from nonaromatic (NICS(1)zz = 4.8 ppm for 2′) to nonaromatic (NICS(1)zz = −7.1 ppm for 3′), and aromatic (NICS(1)zz = −18.2 ppm for 4′). This transformation aligns with the changes in structural parameters (Fig. 2c and Fig. S5), especially the C—C bonds shared between the osmacycle and 5MR. Isodesmic reaction energies [59–61] were calculated by breaking the C═C bond in the osmacyclopentatriene unit of 2′, and the negative values (−15.9 kcal/mol and −8.9 kcal/mol, Fig. S13 in Supporting information) also supported its antiaromaticity as the transformations of the antiaromatic ring to acyclic or non-conjugated structures were thermodynamically favorable. Furthermore, the anisotropy of the induced current density (AICD) study [62,63] was performed on 2′, 3′ and 4′ (Figs. S10-S12 in Supporting information). Clockwisely diatropic ring currents induced by an external magnetic field were observed in all 6MR and the 5MR of 4′, confirming their aromaticity. The antiaromatic osmacyclopentatriene unit of 2′ demonstrated counterclockwisely paratropic ring currents, while there is no regular current on the other rings. The gauge including magnetically induced current (GIMIC) [64–66] was also studied (Figs. S14-S16 in Supporting information). The antiaromatic osmacyclopentatriene unit of 2′ showed counterclockwisely paratropic ring currents with the negative current intensity passing through the integral plane (between −3.45 and −4.55 nÅ/T), while the nonaromatic osmacyclopentatrienyl radical unit of 3′ and the osmacyclopentadiene unit of 4′ exhibited no obviously paratropic or diatropic ring currents.
Fig. 5 depicts the key frontier molecular orbitals of complexes 2, 3, and 4, in which the metal center and ligands form an octahedral coordination geometry from the perspective of crystal field theory. In 3, the SOMO (singly occupied molecular orbital) is predominantly composed of the π molecular orbitals located on carbons of the OsC4 unit and the non-bonding orbitals with t2g symmetry originating from the metal dxz orbital. This composition aligns well with the EPR and the spin density analysis results presented in Fig. 3. The SOMO-1 is mainly constituted by the metal dyz orbital, and it retains a non-bonding nature with t2g symmetry. The interaction between the metal dz2 orbital and the ligand SALC (Symmetry Adapted Linear Combination) orbitals generates the LUMO of 3, which results in metal-centered σ∗-antibonding MOs (possessing eg symmetry). The LUMO+1, LUMO, and HOMO of 2 exhibit similar orbital patterns to the LUMO, SOMO and SOMO-1 of 3, and LUMO, HOMO and HOMO-1 of 4 (Fig. 5). The osmacyclopentatriene ring of 2 can be identified as a 5-center 6-electron (5c-6e) Craig-Möbius antiaromatic system with three occupied π molecular orbitals (π-MOs, HOMO, HOMO-16 and HOMO-17, Fig. S17 in Supporting information), HOMO-16 of which participated in pπ–dπ interaction in the π-MOs involved the phase shift in the osmium center [27,31]. Since the SOMO in 3 has the π-MO character, the presence of delocalized single unpaired electron results in the nonaromaticity of the osmacyclopentatrienyl radical.
The ultraviolet-visible (UV–vis) absorption spectra of 2–4 were measured. As shown in Fig. 6, their maximum absorptions are all around 410–440 nm in the region of 300–800 nm (2a, 424 nm, logε = 6.500 M-1 cm-1; 2b, 412 nm, logε = 6.583 M-1 cm-1; 3a, 430 nm, logε = 6.502 M-1 cm-1; 3b, 437 nm, logε = 6.516 M-1 cm-1; where ε is the molar extinction coefficient), which are attributed to metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transitions involving the osmium center and the conjugated π-system of the ligand. There are also distinct absorptions at around 610–640 nm of 3 (3a, 615 nm, logε = 6.221 M-1 cm-1, 3b, 639 nm, logε = 6.219 M-1 cm-1), which likely arise from intra-ligand π–π* transitions or low-energy d-d transitions associated with the open-shell Os configuration. The extended absorption tails of 2 beyond 700–800 nm are consistent with their antiaromaticity [27,31]. Unsurprisingly, the pale-yellow complexes 4 have no obvious absorptions in the region. In addition, time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations were carried out on model 2a2+ and 3a.+ in DCM medium [67,68]. As shown in Table S1, and Figs. S8 and S9 (Supporting information), the simulated results agree well with the experimental data.
Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed to study the electronic properties of 2a, 3a and 4a. The measured onset reduction and oxidation potentials for 2a, 3a and 4a were −1.35/0.52 V, −0.81/0.64 V and −1.45/0.78 V, respectively (Fig. S3 in Supporting information). The results also show that 2 can be stepwisely reduced with two reduction peaks, while 3 can undergo another reduction step.
To investigate the oxidation states of metal centers in these structures, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on 2a, 3a, and 4a (Fig. S4 in Supporting information). The results revealed that the binding energies of the Os 4f5/2 and 4f7/2 orbitals in 2a were 53.8 eV and 51.1 eV, respectively, while those in 3a were 52.6 eV and 50.1 eV. These values are consistent with the previously reported data for Os(Ⅳ) and Os(Ⅲ) [69,70]. For 4a, the binding energies of the Os 4f5/2 and 4f7/2 orbitals were determined to be 53.5 eV and 50.8 eV, respectively, which agreed with the results of Os(Ⅱ) with CO ligands in the literature [71]. It is noted that the ligands can significantly affect the binding energies of metal centers [72–74].
In conclusion, novel osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals 3 with a delocalized unpaired electron in the OsC4 ring are obtained from the reduction of antiaromatic osmacyclopentatrienes 2. The unique electronic structure of 3 has been characterized by EPR, spin density, spin population and MO analysis. Complexes 3, as well as 2, can be further reduced to nonaromatic osmacyclopentadienes 4 under CO atmosphere. The osmacyclopentatrienyl radicals show similar one-electron redox reactivity as Cp radicals, while they have differences in the unpaired electron distribution. This study provides new insights into radical chemistry and organometallic chemistry.
1
R.G. Hicks, Stable Radicals: Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Odd-electron Compounds, Wiley-Blackwell, New York, 2010.
2
R.G. Hicks, Org. Biomol. Chem. 5 (2007) 1321–1388.
3
H. Gao, F. Wu, Y. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144 (2022) 3458–3467.
4
T. Sarma, G. Kim, S. Sen, Y. Cha, Z. Duan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 12111–12119.
5
T. Satoh, M. Minoura, H. Nakano, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55 (2016) 2235–2238.
6
T.Y. Gopalakrishna, J.S. Reddy, V.G. Anand, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53 (2014) 10984–10987.
7
M. Ishida, S. Kim, C. Preihs, et al., Nat. Chem. 5 (2012) 15–20.
8
Y. Schulte, C. Wölper, S.M. Rupf, et al., Nat. Chem. 16 (2024) 651–657.
9
K. Ziegler, B. Schnell, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 445 (1925) 266–282.
10
T. Kitagawa, K. Ogawa, K. Komatsu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126 (2004) 9930–9931.
11
P.R. Nimax, F. Zoller, T. Blockhaus, et al., New J. Chem. 44 (2020) 72–78.
12
Y. Schulte, B.L. Geoghegan, C. Helling, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 12658–12664.
13
Z. Gong, Q. Xiang, K. Li, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 40 (2022) 2525–2530.
14
Y. Tian, K. Uchida, H. Kurata, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136 (2014) 12784–12793.
15
K. Kato, A. Osuka, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58 (2019) 8978–8986.
16
H. Sitzmann, R. Boese, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 30 (1991) 971–973.
17
C. Janiak, R. Weimann, F. Görlitz, Organometallics 16 (1997) 4933–4936.
18
L.C. Snyder, J. Chem. Phys. 33 (1960) 619–621.
19
L.C. Snyder, J. Phys. Chem. 66 (1962) 2299–2306.
20
B. Xu, D. Chen, K. Ruan, et al., Nature 641 (2025) 106–111.
21
D. Chen, Y. Hua, H. Xia, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 12994–13086.
22
G.P. Elliott, W.R. Roper, J.M. Waters, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. (1982) 811–813.
23
T.B. Wen, Z.Y. Zhou, G. Jia, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 40 (2001) 1951–1954.
24
C. Zhu, S. Li, M. Luo, et al., Nat. Chem. 5 (2013) 698–703.
25
Y. Zhang, J. Wei, Y. Chi, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 5039–5042.
26
K. Zhuo, Y. Liu, K. Ruan, et al., Nat. Synt. 2 (2022) 67–75.
27
L. Chen, L. Lin, A.R. Nath, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 120 (2023) e2215900120.
28
Q. Li, Y. Hua, C. Tang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145 (2023) 7580–7591.
29
K. Miwa, T. Yokota, Q. Wang, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 1396–1402.
30
Y. He, Y. Zhu, M. Luo, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 36 (2025) 110463.
31
B. Fu, Y. Wang, Y. Zhao, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 30790–30795.
32
W. Ma, C. Yu, T. Chen, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 46 (2017) 1160–1192.
33
J. Wei, W. Zhang, Z. Xi, Chem. Sci. 9 (2018) 560–568.
34
Z. Huang, Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, et al., Nat. Commun. 12 (2021) 1319.
35
X. Zhang, J. Wang, L. Xu, et al., CCS Chem. 4 (2022) 3832–3841.
36
X. Jin, J. Wang, X. Yang, et al., Inorg. Chem. 62 (2023) 19323–19331.
37
A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98 (1993) 5648–5652.
38
B. Miehlich, A. Savin, H. Stoll, et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 157 (1989) 200–206.
39
C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37 (1988) 785–789.
40
P.J. Hay, W.R. Wadt, J. Chem. Phys. 82 (1985) 299–310.
41
T. Lu, F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem. 33 (2012) 580–592.
42
T. Lu, J. Chem. Phys. 161 (2024) 082503.
43
A.D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 88 (1988) 2547–2553.
44
L.W. DeVetter, E. Beaver, J. Colquhoun, et al., Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 81 (2016) 321–326.
45
K.B. Wiberg, Tetrahedron. 24 (1968) 1083–1096.
46
M. Zrfar, A. Ahmad, S. Saha, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 8567–8575.
47
S. Ye, B. Sarkar, C. Duboc, J. Fiedler, W. Kaim, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 2843–2847.
48
W. Kaim, Coord. Chem. Rev. 76 (1987) 187–235.
49
W. Bai, L. Li, Y. Fu, et al., Dalton Trans. 52 (2023) 9731–9736.
50
X. Yang, Q. Deng, S. Liu, et al., Inorg. Chem. Front. 12 (2025) 3909–3918.
51
T. Wang, H. Zhang, F. Han, et al., Chem. Eur. J. 19 (2013) 10982–10991.
52
J. Chen, Z. Huang, Y. Hua, et al., Organometallics 34 (2014) 340–347.
53
T. Wang, F. Han, H. Huang, et al., Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 9584.
54
C. Zhu, J. Zhu, X. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 3154–3157.
55
P.V.R. Schleyer, C. Maerker, A. Dransfeld, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 6317–6318.
56
P.V.R. Schleyer, H. Jiao, N.J.R.V. Hommes, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119 (1997) 12669–12670.
57
Z. Chen, C.S. Wannere, C. Corminboeuf, et al., Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 3842–3888.
58
H. Fallah-Bagher-Shaidaei, C.S. Wannere, C. Corminboeuf, et al., Org. Lett. 8 (2006) 863–866.
59
R. Herges, D. Geuenich, J. Phys. Chem. A 105 (2001) 3214–3220.
60
D. Geuenich, K. Hess, F. Köhler, et al., Chem. Rev. 105 (2005) 3758–3772.
61
W.J. Hehre, R. Ditchfield, L. Radom, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92 (1970) 4796–4801.
62
A.A. Deniz, K.S. Peters, G.J. Snyder, Science 286 (1999) 1119–1122.
63
S.E. Wheeler, K.N. Houk, P.V.R. Schleyer, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131 (2009) 2547–2560.
64
H. Fliegl, S. Taubert, O. Lehtonen, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13 (2011) 20500–20518.
65
D. Sundholm, H. Fliegl, R.J.F. Berger, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 6 (2016) 639–678.
66
Z. Badri, C. Foroutan-Nejad, Nat. Rev. Chem. 8 (2024) 551–560.
67
C. Adamo, D. Jacquemin, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 845–856.
68
M. Huix-Rotllant, A. Nikiforov, W. Thiel, et al., Description of Conical Intersections With Density Functional Methods., Topics in Current Chemistry, Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 445–476.
69
D.D. Sarma, C.N.R. Rao. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 20 (1980) 25–45.
70
S. Gayen, F. Assanar, S. Shyamal, D.P. Dorairaj, S. Ghosh, Chem. Sci. 15 (2024) 15913–15924.
71
A.R. Siedle, R.A. Newmark, G.A. Korba, L.H. Pignolet, Paul D. Boyle, Inorg. Chem. 27 (1988), 1593–1598.
72
X. Fu, Y. Wang, N. Wu, et al., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 243 (2001) 326–330.
73
M. Giuliano, J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 95 (1998) 95–144.
74
R. Zanoni, V. Carinci, Raja H. Abu-Samn, R. Psaro, C. Dossi, J. Mol. Struct. 131 (1985) 363–369.
Year 2026 volume 37 Issue 10
PDF
48
26
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112281
  • Receive Date:2025-10-08
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2026-10-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-10-08
  • Revised:2025-12-02
  • Accepted:2025-12-12
Affiliations
    aSchool of Chemistry, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
    bSchool of Chemical Engineering, Ocean and Life Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124221, China

Corresponding:

*

E-mail addresses: (Y. Li)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112281
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT