收藏切换
Electrochemical α-glycosylation of exo-glycals
收藏切换
PDF
Jing Zhang, Chen-Fei Gao, Xin-Shan Ye, De-Cai Xiong
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(9) : 112200
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(9): 112200
• Communication •
Electrochemical α-glycosylation of exo-glycals
Full
Jing Zhang, Chen-Fei Gao, Xin-Shan Ye, De-Cai Xiong
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China
About Author:

1 These authors contributed equally to this work.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jing Zhang: Writing – original draft, Investigation.

Chen-Fei Gao: Investigation.

Xin-Shan Ye: Resources.

De-Cai Xiong: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Conceptualization.

Published: 2026-09-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112200
Outline
收藏切换

Electrosynthesis has emerged as a powerful and sustainable strategy in organic chemistry, with growing applications in carbohydrate synthesis. Herein, we report an electrochemical method for the regio- and stereo-selective O-glycosylation of exo-glycals with a wide range of substrates under mild conditions. This approach employs simple setup in an undivided cell with KOTf as electrolyte, facilitating the efficient synthesis of bioactive O-glycosides in good yields and with exclusive α-selectivity. The reaction exhibits broad substrate compatibility, accommodating both sugar- and non-sugar-based acceptors, including complex natural products and pharmaceuticals. Furthermore, gram-scale reactions proceed without loss of efficiency or stereocontrol, underscoring the practicality of this method. Mechanistic studies suggest a radical cation-based pathway. This strategy provides a robust and scalable platform for O-glycosides synthesis.

Exo-glycals  /  1′-C-methyl-O-glycosides  /  Stereoselectivity  /  Electrocatalysis  /  Glycosylation
Jing Zhang, Chen-Fei Gao, Xin-Shan Ye, De-Cai Xiong. Electrochemical α-glycosylation of exo-glycals[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026 , 37 (9) : 112200 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112200
Nucleic acids, proteins, and polysaccharides constitute the three fundamental classes of biomolecules essential for life. Among these, polysaccharides play critical roles in numerous biological processes, including bacterial and viral infections, cell recognition, immune regulation, inflammatory responses, and cancer metabolism [1–3]. Advances in understanding carbohydrate-receptor interactions have spurred significant progress in the synthesis of carbohydrate analogs and mimetics [4–7]. Nonetheless, significant challenges remain in glycoscience, particularly in achieving the efficient and stereoselective synthesis of bioactive oligosaccharides and glycoconjugates. Addressing these challenges requires the development of innovative synthetic platforms capable of generating diverse carbohydrate-based structures, thereby bridging the gap between fundamental glycoscience and its medical applications.
In recent years, electrochemical organic synthesis has emerged as a powerful tool for green synthesis, offering advantages such as high atom economy, mild reaction conditions, and scalability [8–17]. These attributes make electrochemical methods particularly attractive for glycosylation reactions [18–28].
Glycals represent an important class of polyhydroxylated chiral synthons that serve as versatile synthetic intermediates in the synthesis of oligosaccharides, glycoconjugates, and bioactive natural products [29–34]. They are broadly classified into two categories: Endo-glycals, which contain an endocyclic carbon-carbon double bond, and exo-glycals (or 1-methylene sugars), featuring an exocyclic double bond (Fig. 1a) [35]. Endo-glycals have been extensively explored and widely employed in O- and C-glycosylation reactions [20,21,26,34,36–52]. In medicinal chemistry, exo-glycals are valued as glycosidase inhibitors [53–55] and have been used in the synthesis of C-glycoside analogs via various strategies, including hydroboration/Suzuki cross-coupling [56], Stille cross-coupling [57], Heck reactions [58], radical addition [59], epoxidation [60], and others methods [56–66].
In contrast, O-glycosylation reactions employing exo-glycals as glycosyl donors remain underdeveloped [67–73]. Existing approaches are largely limited to two conventional pathways: (a) Lewis acid-catalyzed direct O-glycosylation [72,73] and (b) Lewis acid-promoted rearrangement reactions [69,70], both of which have been applied to synthesize biologically relevant 1′-C-methyl-O-glycosides. These methods, however, suffer from several drawbacks, including narrow substrate scope, limited stereocontrol, and harsh reaction conditions. Thus, the development of efficient and stereoselective strategies for synthesizing 1′-C-methyl-O-glycoside analogs is highly desirable.
Our group recently reported an electrochemical method for glycosylation using endo-glycal, which afforded products in high yields with excellent selectivity, offering an efficient and novel strategy for O-glycosylation (Fig. 1d) [20]. Inspired by the structural similarities between the double bonds in exo- and endo-glycals, and encouraged by the efficiency and sustainability of electrochemical synthesis, we sought to extend this electro-promoted approach to achieve efficient and stereoselective O-glycosylation of exo-glycals (1-methylene sugars) to form 1′-C-methyl-O-glycosides (Fig. 1e). Herein, we present an electrochemical method for the efficient synthesis of O-glycoside analogs from exo-glycals and nucleophilic acceptors. The electrochemical method exhibits a combination of broad substrate scope, outstanding functional group tolerance (especially for alkenes), excellent stereocontrol, and enhanced reaction efficiency. In addition, this strategy not only expands the synthetic utility of exo-glycals but also aligns with green chemistry principles by reducing environmental impact.
We initiated our investigation by examining the electrochemical glycosylation of benzyl protected-1-methylenesugars 1a and 2a in an undivided electrochemical cell (Table 1). Under initial conditions using Bu4NOTf as the electrolyte, a graphite anode, a platinum plate cathode, CH3CN as the solvent, room temperature, and a constant current of 2 mA, the target product 3a was achieved with 44% yield and exclusive α-selectivity (entry 1). Solvent screening revealed a significant influence on the reaction outcome (entries 2–4). Low or negligible yields were observed with 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), diethyl ether, or 1,4-dioxane. Subsequent evaluation of electrolytes, including Bu4NBF4, Bu4NOAc, Bu4NBr, KOTf and NaOTf, identified KOTf and NaOTf as superior, affording 3a in 51% and 50% yields, respectively (entries 5–9). Based on these results, KOTf (2.0 equiv.) was selected for further optimization. We then evaluated alternative electrode configurations. Employing graphite for both electrodes resulted in a diminished yield of 31% (entry 10), while a Pt/Pt setup completely inhibited the reaction (entry 11). Notably, reversing the electrodes to a Pt anode and graphite cathode significantly improved the yield to 87% (entry 12). Varying the current intensity did not lead to further enhancement (entries 13 and 14). Control experiments confirmed that both electricity and electrolyte are essential, as no reaction occurred in their absence (entries 15 and 16).
Having established the optimal electrochemical conditions, we next evaluated the scope of glycosyl donors (Table 2). Firstly, we synthesized a series of exo-glycals, including gluco– (1a and 1g), galacto- (1b), manno- (1c), rhamno-(1d), fuco- (1e) and lacto- (1f), following established literature procedures [35,63,74]. Under the standard conditions, the reaction between 1-methylidene-2,3,4,5-tetra-O-benzyl-d-glucopyranoside (1a) and acceptor 2a afforded disaccharide 3a in 87% yield (entry 1). Notably, a variety of perbenzylated 1-methylene sugars (1b-1e) acted as competent donors, yielding the corresponding disaccharides 3b-3e in excellent yields ranging from 90% to 97% (entries 2–5). Trisaccharide 3f was also obtained in good yield when lacto-derived donor 1f was employed (entry 6). Furthermore, the 1-ethylsugar was found to be compatible with the system, furnishing glycoside 3g in 75% yield (entry 7).
We then explored the acceptor scope of the transformation (Table 3). Both primary and secondary non-sugar alcohols were suitable reaction partners under the standard conditions, delivering glycosides 4a-4d in 71%−95% yields. Among these, product 4d was obtained with an α/β selectivity of 22/1 (entry 4), while the others were exclusively α-configuration. Notably, the reaction could be scaled up to furnish 4b in 86% yield (739 mg, entry 2). Reactions of cyclododecanol with either exo-glucal or exo-galcal donors provided 4c and 4d in 71% and 73% yields, respectively (entries 3 and 4). Acceptors containing a free C-6 hydroxyl group underwent smooth glycosylation to afford disaccharides 4e-4f in 83%–91% yields (entries 5 and 6). Reactions with acceptors containing free C-3 or C-2 hydroxyl groups were less effective at room temperature; however, reducing the temperature to −30 ℃ improved the yields of products 4g and 4h to moderate to good levels (entries 7 and 8). Di-glycosylation of 1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)cyclopropane and 1,12-dodecanediol with exo-glucal afforded 4i and 4j in 87% and 77% yields, respectively (entries 9 and 10).
To further demonstrate the practical utility of this method, we applied the electro-glycosylation reaction to the late-stage glycosylation of natural products (Table 4). Epiandrosterone was successfully coupled with exo-glucal donor under standard reaction conditions to afford 5a in 61% yiled. Similarly, podophyllotoxin was glycosylated to give 5b in 60% yield. Beta-sitosterol was also modified using different glycosyl donors (1a and 1b), yielding products 5c and 5d in 84% and 85% yields, respectively. Cholesterol proved to be a suitable substrate as well, providing glycosides 5e and 5f in good yields.
To gain further insight into the reaction mechanism, a series of mechanistic experiments were conducted (Scheme 1). First, control experiments confirmed the essential role of electrical current and electrolyte, as no glycosylation occurred in their absence (Schemes 1a and b). Subsequently, the introduction of the radical scavenger TEMPO under standard conditions completely suppressed the formation of product 3a. Notably, intermediates 6 and 7 were detected via ESI-MS, suggesting the involvement of radical species and a radical-inhibited pathway (Scheme 1c).
Deuterium labeling experiments provided additional insight into the source of the methyl hydrogen in the product. When the reaction between 1a and 2a was performed in CD3CN, no deuterium incorporation was observed in the product, ruling out the solvent as the hydrogen source (Scheme 1d). In a complementary experiment, reaction of 1a with CD3OD in CH3CN afforded deuterated product 8, confirming that the methyl proton originates from the nucleophilic acceptor (Scheme 1e).
Based on these experimental results, along with supporting evidence from cyclic voltammetry (Figs. S7-S9 in Supporting information) and previous literature reports [73,75–80], a plausible reaction mechanism is proposed (Fig. 2). Initially, the glycosyl donor 1 is oxidized at the anode to form a radical cation intermediate Ⅰ. Concurrently, the alcohol nucleophile is reduced at the cathode, generating a hydrogen radical and an alkoxide ion. The hydrogen radical combines with intermediate Ⅰ to form carbocation intermediate Ⅱ. The approach of acetonitrile is directed by the anomeric effect preferentially from the α-face, leading to the selective formation of intermediate Ⅲ. In acetonitrile solvent, Ⅲ predominates due to effective stabilization. Significant steric hindrance from the C1-methyl group prevents nucleophilic approach from the β-face, while favoring minor dissociation back to intermediate Ⅱ. Ultimately, the alkoxide attacks intermediate Ⅲ from the sterically accessible α-face, resulting in the thermodynamically favored α-glycoside product.
In concluding, we have developed an electrochemical glycosylation method for the stereoselective synthesis of O-glycosides using exo-glucals and various nucleophilic acceptors. This approach operates under simple conditions in an undivided cell, employing KOTf as the electrolyte to afford the corresponding glycosylation products in high yields with excellent selectivity. The reaction accommodates a broad range of glycosyl and non-glycosyl acceptors, consistently yielding products with exclusive α-selectivity. Scalability was demonstrated through gram-scale synthesis without compromising yield or stereoselectivity. Furthermore, the method proved effective for the late-stage glycosylation of natural products and pharmaceuticals, highlighting its potential for the discovery of carbohydrate-based drugs. This electrochemical strategy thus represents an efficient and attractive platform for synthesizing O-glycosides.
1
S.C. Ranade, A.V. Demchenko, J. Carbohydr. Chem. 32 (2013) 1–43.
2
K.T. Schjoldager, Y. Narimatsu, H.J. Joshi, et al., Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 (2020) 729–749.
3
A. Varki, Glycobiology 27 (2016) 3–49.
4
Y.D. Vankar, R.R. Schmidt, Chem. Soc. Rev. 29 (2000) 201–216.
5
F. Pfrengle, H.U. Reissig, Chem. Soc. Rev. 39 (2010) 549–557.
6
W. Li, B. Yu, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 7954–7984.
7
A. Tamburrini, C. Colombo, A. Bernardi, Med. Res. Rev. 40 (2020) 495–531.
8
R. Francke, R.D. Little, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 2492–2521.
9
Y. Li, S. Dana, L. Ackermann, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 40 (2023) 101312.
10
N. Fu, G.S. Sauer, S. Lin, Nat. Protoc. 13 (2018) 1725–1743.
11
J.E. Nutting, M. Rafiee, S.S. Stahl, Chem. Rev. 118 (2018) 4834–4885.
12
J.C. Siu, N. Fu, S. Lin, Acc. Chem. Res. 53 (2020) 547–560.
13
L. Song, N. Fu, B.G. Ernst, et al., Nat. Chem. 12 (2020) 747–754.
14
L.F.T. Novaes, J. Liu, Y. Shen, et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (2021) 7941–8002.
15
C. Zhu, N.W.J. Ang, T.H. Meyer, et al., ACS Cent. Sci. 7 (2021) 415–431.
16
C.A. Malapit, M.B. Prater, J.R. Cabrera-Pardo, et al., Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 3180–3218.
17
M.C. Lamb, K.A. Steiniger, L.K. Trigoura, et al., Chem. Rev. 124 (2024) 12264–12304.
18
R.R. France, R.G. Compton, B.G. Davis, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (2004) 2195–2202.
19
S. Manmode, K. Matsumoto, T. Nokami, et al., Asian J. Org. Chem. 7 (2018) 1719–1729.
20
M. Liu, K.M. Liu, D.C. Xiong, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59 (2020) 15204–15208.
21
M. Liu, Z.X. Luo, T. Li, et al., J. Org. Chem. 86 (2021) 16187–16194.
22
Z.X. Luo, M. Liu, T. Li, et al., Front. Chem. 9 (2021) 796690.
23
H. Endo, M. Ochi, M.A. Rahman, et al., Chem. Commun. 58 (2022) 7948–7951.
24
S. Kim, P. Nagorny, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 2294–2298.
25
R.Q. Wang, Q.H. Jiang, H.X. Wang, et al., Org. Lett. 25 (2023) 4252–4257.
26
C. Qi, G. Goti, A. Sartorel, et al., Org. Lett. 26 (2024) 9328–9333.
27
J. Wu, R. Purushothaman, F. Kallert, et al., ACS Catal. 14 (2024) 11532–11544.
28
H. Endo, Y.C. Sun, N. Sasaki, et al., Chem. Commun. 61 (2025) 4483–4494.
29
W. Priebe, G. Grynkiewicz, Formation and reactions of glycal derivatives, in: B.O. Fraser-Reid, K. Tatsuta, J. Thiem (Eds.) Glycoscience: chemistry and Chemical Biology Ⅰ–Ⅲ, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001, pp. 749– 783.
30
L. Somsák, Chem. Rev. 101 (2001) 81–136.
31
C. Taillefumier, Y. Chapleur, Chem. Rev. 104 (2004) 263–292.
32
T. Kaszás, M. Tóth, P. Langer, et al., Adv. Synth. Catal. 361 (2019) 105–117.
33
Y. Yadav, R. Sagar, Chem. Asian J. 20 (2025) e202401773.
34
R. Das, M. Das, D. Mukherjee, et al., Synthesis 56 (2024) 1070–1096.
35
C.J.M. Frédéric, S.P. Vincent, Tetrahedron 74 (2018) 6512–6519.
36
R.R. Schmidt, Y.D. Vankar, Acc. Chem. Res. 41 (2008) 1059–1073.
37
C. Palo-Nieto, A. Sau, M.C. Galan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 14041–14044.
38
A. Sau, R. Williams, C. Palo-Nieto, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56 (2017) 3640–3644.
39
C. Liu, Y. Ma, C. Pei, et al., Chin. J. Chem. 36 (2018) 1007–1010.
40
G. Zhao, T. Wang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57 (2018) 6120–6124.
41
Y. Dai, B. Tian, H. Chen, et al., ACS Catal. 9 (2019) 2909–2915.
42
R.B. Addanki, S. Halder, P.K. Kancharla, Org. Lett. 24 (2022) 1465–1470.
43
K.M. Liu, P.Y. Wang, Z.Y. Guo, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61 (2022) e202204923.
44
X.P. Gong, Y. Li, H.C. Liu, et al., CCS Chem. 5 (2023) 741–749.
45
M. Zeng, C. Yu, Y. Wang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202300424.
46
A. Chen, Y. Han, R. Wu, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 5228.
47
Q. Jiao, Z. Guo, M. Zheng, et al., Adv. Sci. 11 (2024) 2308513.
48
M.Y. Lyu, S.A. Jacobo, M.K. Brown, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 18866–18872.
49
M.K. Sharma, B. Tiwari, N. Hussain, Chem. Commun. 60 (2024) 4838–4841.
50
Z. Shen, G. Yin, Y. Li, Chin. J. Chem. 42 (2024) 2147–2152.
51
Z. Shen, Y. Yu, D. Wu, et al., Nat. Commun. 15 (2024) 10167.
52
H. Shi, G. Yin, X. Lu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 109674.
53
E.J. Hehre, C.F. Brewer, T. Uchiyama, et al., Biochemistry 19 (1980) 3557–3564.
54
H. Fritz, J. Lehmann, P. Schlesselmann, Carbohydr. Res. 113 (1983) 71–92.
55
C.F. Brewer, E.J. Hehre, J. Lehmann, et al., Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1984 (1984) 1078–1087.
56
A.M. Gómez, A. Pedregosa, S. Valverde, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 44 (2003) 6111–6116.
57
A.M. Gómez, A. Barrio, I. Amurrio, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 47 (2006) 6243–6246.
58
R. Peng, M.S. VanNieuwenhze, Org. Lett. 14 (2012) 1962–1965.
59
C.J.M. Frédéric, J. Cornil, M. Vandamme, et al., Org. Lett. 20 (2018) 6769–6773.
60
J. József, L. Somsák, M. Tóth, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 26 (2023) e202201488.
61
T.V. RajanBabu, G.S. Reddy, J. Org. Chem. 51 (1986) 5458–5461.
62
H.T.T. Thien, A. Novoa, N. Pellegrini-Moïse, et al., Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011 (2011) 6939–6951.
63
Y.B. Chen, S.H. Liu, M.T. Hsieh, et al., J. Org. Chem. 81 (2016) 3007–3016.
64
D. Tardieu, M. Desnoyers, C. Laye, et al., Org. Lett. 21 (2019) 7262–7267.
65
J. Regier, S. Ghanty, Y. Bolshan, J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 524–530.
66
M. Lang, S. Walter, D. Hatey, et al., Org. Lett. 26 (2024) 8017–8022.
67
G.V.M. Sharma, A.S. Chander, V. Goverdhan Reddy, et al., Tetrahedron. Lett. 41 (2000) 1997–2000.
68
C.F. Chang, W.B. Yang, C.C. Chang, et al., Tetrahedron Lett. 43 (2002) 6515–6519.
69
H.C. Lin, W.B. Yang, Y.F. Gu, et al., Org. Lett. 5 (2003) 1087–1089.
70
H.C. Lin, C.C. Chang, J.Y. Chen, et al., Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 16 (2005) 297–301.
71
H.C. Lin, Y.B. Chen, Z.P. Lin, et al., Tetrahedron 66 (2010) 5229–5234.
72
H. Liu, A.G. Laporte, D. Tardieu, et al., J. Org. Chem. 87 (2022) 13178–13194.
73
X. Li, H. Ohtake, H. Takahashi, et al., Tetrahedron 57 (2001) 4283–4295.
74
S. Habib, F. Larnaud, E. Pfund, et al., Org. Biomol. Chem. 12 (2014) 690–699.
75
W.T. Huntress, G.F. Mitchell, Astrophys. J. 231 (1979) 456–467.
76
E. Vigren, M. Kamińska, M. Hamberg, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10 (2008) 4014–4019.
77
E. Juaristi, G. Cuevas, Tetrahedron 48 (1992) 5019–5987.
78
S.S. Nigudkar, A.V. Demchenko, Chem. Sci. 6 (2015) 2687–2704.
79
I. Tvaroska, T. Bleha, Anomeric and exo-anomeric effects in carbohydrate chemistry, in: R.S. Tipson, D. Horton (Eds.), Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 47, Academic Press, 1989, pp. 45–123.
80
G.J. Boons, Mono-and oligosaccharides: structure, con-figuration and conformation, in: G.J. Boons (Ed.), Carbohydrate Chemistry, Sheffield Academic Press, 1998, pp. 1–25.
Year 2026 volume 37 Issue 9
PDF
69
39
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112200
  • Receive Date:2025-09-08
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2026-09-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-09-08
  • Revised:2025-11-18
  • Accepted:2025-11-28
Affiliations
    State Key Laboratory of Natural and Biomimetic Drugs, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100191, China

Corresponding:

*

E-mail addresses: (D.-C. Xiong)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.112200
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT