收藏切换
Enabling guest-binding selectivity in hexahedral metal-organic cages via vertex modification
收藏切换
PDF
Tian Tana, Jiao Hua, Ya-Liang Laia, Xian-Chao Zhoua, Yong-Zhen Tana, Mo Xiea, Yong-Liang Huangb, Chuang-Wei Zhoua, Hao-Jie Zhanga, Dong Luoa, Xiao-Ping Zhoua, Dan Lia
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(9) : 111331
Less
收藏切换
Chinese Chemical Letters | 2026, 37(9): 111331
• Communication •
Enabling guest-binding selectivity in hexahedral metal-organic cages via vertex modification
Full
Tian Tana, Jiao Hua, Ya-Liang Laia, Xian-Chao Zhoua, Yong-Zhen Tana, Mo Xiea, Yong-Liang Huangb, Chuang-Wei Zhoua, Hao-Jie Zhanga, Dong Luoa, Xiao-Ping Zhoua, Dan Lia
Affiliations
  • aCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Coordination Chemistry, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
  • bDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
About Author:

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Tian Tan: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Data curation.

Jiao Hu: Writing – review & editing, Software, Investigation, Data curation.

Ya-Liang Lai: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Software, Data curation.

Xian-Chao Zhou: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Data curation.

Yong-Zhen Tan: Writing – review & editing, Software, Data curation.

Mo Xie: Writing – review & editing, Software, Formal analysis.

Yong-Liang Huang: Writing – review & editing, Software, Data curation.

Chuang-Wei Zhou: Writing – review & editing, Software, Data curation.

Hao-Jie Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Data curation.

Dong Luo: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Xiao-Ping Zhou: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Dan Li: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition.

Published: 2026-09-15 doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111331
Outline
收藏切换

This work investigates the impact of vertex modification on the host-guest chemistry of a hexahedral Zn(Ⅱ)-based metal-organic cage (MOC) 1 containing fluorinated components. Structural characterization via single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), 1H NMR, and electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectra (ESI-TOF MS) confirmed the low-symmetry hexahedral architectures of 1·NTf2 and 1·OTf, with fluorine atoms positioned at cage windows. 1H/19F NMR spectra of 1·NTf2 and 1·OTf showed slow-exchange binding behavior with external anions. 1·NTf2 had a single set of peaks in the imine signal area, while 1·OTf had two distinct groups of signals. Combined with competitive anion titration results, it can be inferred that NTf2- has a stronger binding affinity with the cage structure. Host-guest studies with pyrene (Py) and its hydrogenated analogs revealed complete displacement of OTf- but not NTf2-, highlighting the superior binding strength of NTf2-. Comparative isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) data showed reduced association constants for 1·OTf with pyrene (Py) and its analogs 4,5,9,10-tetrahydropyrene (4H-Py) and hexadecahydropyrene (16H-Py) compared to 2·OTf, attributed to electron-withdrawing fluorine substituents altering charge distribution, which was confirmed by the electrostatic potential analysis of the cage skeleton. These findings underscore how vertex functionalization modulates anion selectivity and guest-binding thermodynamics in MOCs, offering insights for designing tailored supramolecular hosts.

Metal-organic cage  /  Host-guest chemistry  /  Vertex modification  /  Anion binding  /  Pyrene
Tian Tan, Jiao Hu, Ya-Liang Lai, Xian-Chao Zhou, Yong-Zhen Tan, Mo Xie, Yong-Liang Huang, Chuang-Wei Zhou, Hao-Jie Zhang, Dong Luo, Xiao-Ping Zhou, Dan Li. Enabling guest-binding selectivity in hexahedral metal-organic cages via vertex modification[J]. Chinese Chemical Letters, 2026 , 37 (9) : 111331 - . DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111331
Metal-organic cages (MOCs) with diverse nanocavities created through coordination directed self-assembly have been the subject of thorough research due to their unique characteristics [1–9]. These cages are capable of accommodating a range of guest species, making them valuable for tasks such as chemical separations [10–12], stable active species [13–15], catalysis [16–18], and drug delivery [19,20]. In order to achieve the above functions, it is crucial and challenging to cleverly utilize supramolecular interactions and spatial effects that affect the binding ability between host and guest species, such as electrostatic affinity, hydrogen bonding, π-stacking, solvent effect, and steric hindrance [21–23].
The ligand modification in MOCs is a common approach involving replacing specific ligand substituents in a rational manner, exploiting electronic or spatial effects to directly influence the structure and properties of the cages [24–28]. Previously reported examples show that MOC structures with different topological or symmetrical types can be constructed by appropriately replacing substituents [29–34]. For instance, Fujita et al. created a giant M30L60 icosidodecahedron by adjusting the flexibility of the ligand through modifications with different numbers of methyl groups [29]. Nitschke et al. reported the successful construction of two new Cu12IL8 cages with different structures using similar subcomponents except for the substituents (e.g., –H, –F and –OCH3) in the components [34]. However, the predictability of MOC topological structure changes caused by local substituent modification is unclear, which poses a challenge for studying the structure-activity relationships of its subsequent host-guest chemistry. Some interesting studies have shown that by appropriate vertex modification while keeping the MOC topology unchanged, the host-guest properties of the cage cavity can be well controlled [35–39]. For example, the subcomponent exchange converted the FeⅡ centers of a tetrahedral cage from high-spin to low-spin state by replacing 2-formyl-6-methylpyridine with 2-formylpyridine, endowing the cage system with the ability to responsively release guests [35]. The development of such cage systems in which topology is maintained after vertex modifications will provide an excellent platform for studying attractive host-guest chemistry.
Here, we explore a vertex functionalization method to study the influences of the host-guest chemistry of MOCs by comparing fluorinated hexahedral MOC 1 and non-fluorinated MOC 2 [40,41]. Structural characterization via single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD), 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra, electrospray ionization time-of-flight mass spectra (ESI-TOF MS) confirmed that MOC 1 adopts low-symmetry architectures similar to MOC 2, with fluorine atoms positioned at cage windows. 1H/19F NMR spectra of 1·NTf2 and 1·OTf exhibited slow-exchange binding behavior on the NMR time scale with the external anions. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1·NTf2 showed a single set of peaks in the imine signal area, while 1·OTf displayed two distinct groups of signals. This suggests that the NTf2- anion has a stronger binding affinity with the cage. Competitive anion titrations also demonstrated a hierarchy in binding strength (NTf2- > OTf- > BF4-), with NTf2- resisting displacement by smaller anions or aromatic guests. Host-guest studies showed pyrene fully displaced OTf- but not NTf2-, underscoring the superior affinity of NTf2-. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) further revealed reduced association constants for 1·OTf compared to 2·OTf when binding polycyclic hydrocarbons. This was attributed to the electron-withdrawing fluorine effects altering charge distribution. These findings highlight how vertex modification fine-tunes anion selectivity and guest-binding thermodynamics in MOCs, offering a strategic approach to designing adaptive supramolecular hosts for applications.
The reaction of 1,2,4,5-tetrakis-(4-aminolphenyl)benzene (TAPB), 3-fluoro-2-formylpyridine, and ZnX2 (X including NTf2-, OTf-, and BF4-) salt in acetonitrile (CH3CN) at 70 ℃ for 8 h gave MOC 1 (Fig. 1, see Supporting information for synthesis experimental details). The products corresponding to different counteracting anions were named as 1·NTf2, 1·OTf, and 1·BF4. As comparative structures with the same geometric shape, the previously reported MOC 2 (marked as 2·OTf, 2·NTf2, and 2·BF4) [40,41] was synthesized by replacing 3-fluoro-2-formylpyridine with 2-formylpyridine in the former synthesis conditions. The 1H NMR spectra of MOCs 1 and 2 were recorded and showed in Fig. 2, Figs. S3, S13, S25, and S35-S37 (Supporting information). The 1H NMR spectrum of 1·NTf2 in CD3CN displayed four distinct signals in the imine region with integrated area ratio of 1:1:1:1 (H1, Fig. 2), which are similar to the signals of 2·NTf2, indicating that they may have similar low-symmetry cage structures [41]. However, it is evident that the 1H NMR signal distribution of 1·OTf was significantly different from that of 2·OTf. Eight signals appeared in the imine region, and their integrated area ratios were 1:1:1:1:1:1:1:1 (Fig. 2), suggesting that they might belong to two different forms of cage species in the solution. The similar results appeared in the 1H NMR spectra of 1·BF4 after comparison with 2·BF4 (Fig. 2). The above phenomenon prompted us to speculate that the modification of the cage vertices resulted in a significant change in the host-guest binding behavior between the cage and the anions.
In order to understand the reasons for the differences in the above 1H NMR data, 1·NTf2 and 1·OTf were selected as key research objects for detailed characterization. The diffusion ordered 1H NMR spectrum (DOSY) and ESI-TOF MS were firstly measured to investigate the composition of 1·NTf2. As showed in Fig. S4 (Supporting information), all the peaks of 1·NTf2 had the same diffusion constant (D = 5.50 × 10-10 m2/s), indicating that these peaks belonged to a single species. The hydrodynamic radius of 1·NTf2 in CH3CN was calculated to be ~11.9 Å via the Stokes-Einstein equation [42,43]. At the same time, ESI-TOF mass spectra (Figs. S5 and S6 in Supporting information) showed that 1·NTf2 had multi-charge features and the compositional characteristic of [Zn8L6(NTf2)16-n]n+ (n = 10–4). The main peak observed at m/z = 1181.0524 matched the [1·(NTf2)9]7+ species (calculated value 1180.9854). Additionally, all peaks corresponding to the different charged species aligned well with their calculated isotopic patterns, confirming the composition and stability of 1·NTf2 in the CH3CN solution. In addition, purple block crystals of 1·NTf2 that suitable for single crystal X-ray diffraction (SCXRD) analysis were obtained by diffusing ethyl acetate vapor into its CH3CN solution containing iodine as crystallization-aiding molecules (see Supporting information for detailed crystallographic data). 1·NTf2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/c, and the cage molecule features an 8-nucleus hexahedral structure (Fig. 3a). Six TAPB-based ligands act as faces of the cage with an average distance of about 12.25 Å between the face centers, bridging the eight octahedral ZnⅡ centers and forming ΔΔΛΛΛΛΛΛ or ΛΛΔΔΔΔΔΔ stereo configurations, which are similar to that of 2·NTf2 (Fig. 3b) [41]. The hydrophobic cavities of 1·NTf2 and 2·NTf2 have the volume of 492 Å3 and 482 Å3, respectively, estimated by MoloVol with a probe radius of 1.2 Å [41]. It is worth noting that the modified fluorine atoms on the ligand surround the vertex and are arranged at the window of 1·NTf2 (Fig. 3). These structural features may have an impact on its host-guest behavior.
Subsequently, a variety of 2D NMR spectra were utilized to validate the structure of 1·NTf2 in solution (Figs. S8-S10 in Supporting information). The heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) spectrum of 1·NTf2 (Fig. S8) showed that there was one set of imine signals belonging to the cage species in the imine region. Moreover, the 19F NMR spectrum of 1·NTf2 was recorded and showed two sets of signal distribution (Fig. S11 in Supporting information). From the region of −119 ~ −122 ppm, there were four different F signals attributed to pyridine parts, and their integrated area ratio was 1:1:1:1. It was consistent with the situation of imine signals, further proving that 1·NTf2 had a low symmetry structure. Another group of signals came from NTf2- anions. It was found that the peaks at −70.4 and −80.1 ppm corresponded to encapsulated and free NTf2- anions respectively [44]. Based on the above data, it can be concluded that there is a host-guest binding between the cage and the NTf2- anion, and this process exhibits slow exchange on the nuclear magnetic time scale [34,44–46] without affected by temperature (Fig. S12 in Supporting information).
Similar characterizations were performed on 1·OTf to explore its different host-guest binding behaviors. The DOSY 1H NMR spectrum and ESI-TOF MS of 1·OTf were tested and showed in Fig. S14 (Supporting information). All the peaks of 1·OTf had the same diffusion constant (D = 3.54 × 10-10 m2/s). At the same time, ESI-TOF mass spectra (Figs. S15 and S16 in Supporting information) of 1·OTf had multi-charge species and the compositional characteristic of [Zn8L6(OTf)16-n]n+ (n = 9–4). The main peak observed at m/z = 1012.8159 matched the [1·(OTf)9]7+ species (calculated value 1012.8835). All signals attributed to the various charged species matched their calculated isotopic patterns. Furthermore, several 2D NMR spectra were examined (Figs. S18-S20 in Supporting information), including the HSQC spectrum of 1·OTf (Fig. S18), which revealed two distinct sets of imine signals corresponding to different cage species in the imine region. The 19F NMR spectrum of 1·OTf was shown in Fig. S21 (Supporting information). The presence of two groups of signals in the range of −119 ~ −122 ppm also supported the inference that there were two different species in the solution. The signal at −78.25 ppm indicated that some of OTf- anions were encapsulated in the cage. Additionally, the 1H NMR spectra of 1·OTf with varying concentrations and temperatures (Figs. S22-S24 in Supporting information) indicated that the composition of species in the solution was minimally influenced by these factors. More importantly, the crystal structure of 1·OTf (see Supporting information for detailed crystallographic data) shows that it has a similar structure to 1·NTf2, indicating that the differences between the two species mentioned above are caused by the host-guest interactions between the cage and anions, rather than the symmetry or a new structure of the cage. Therefore, we speculate that 1·OTf has the same cage skeleton as 1·NTf2, but the complex 1H NMR spectrum (Fig. 2) should be caused by the different degrees of slow exchange process between OTf- and the cage on the NMR time scale [44–46]. The binding behavior of 1·OTf is different from 1·NTf2, 2·OTf, and 2·NTf2, indicating that through vertex modification, MOC 1 has acquired the ability to selectively bind with anionic guests.
To further investigate the changes in binding ability between anionic guests and metal-organic cages caused by vertex modifications, we performed a series of experiments involving anion titrations. The general procedure involves dissolving 1·NTf2 or 1·OTf in CD3CN (2.5 × 10-3 mol/L), followed by the addition of 16 equiv. of tetrabutylammonium trifluoromethanesulfonate (TBAOTf) or tetrabutylammonium bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)amide (TBANTf2), respectively. The solutions were equilibrated at 70 ℃ for 3 h, and then the system was characterized by 1H NMR and 19F NMR. As shown in Fig. 4a and Fig. S40 (Supporting information), with the addition of 16 equiv. of OTf- anion, there is no change in the aromatic region of the 1H NMR spectra of 1·NTf2. Additionally, the 19F NMR spectra of the system (marked as TBAOTf@1·NTf2, Fig. 4b) indicate that in the range of −79 ~ −80 ppm, upon the addition of OTf− anion, the bound NTf2- anions remain unchanged and there are no signals indicating the presence of encapsulated OTf- anion. Furthermore, the chemical environment of the fluorine atoms on the cage remains consistent (Fig. S41 in Supporting information). These initial findings suggest that the MOC 1 has a higher binding affinity for NTf2- anions compared to OTf- anions. To further validate this result, the 1·OTf solution was titrated with NTf2- anions. As shown in Figs. 4c and d, the addition of NTf2- anions has resulted in significant changes in the 1H and 19F NMR spectra of the system (marked as TBANTf2@1·OTf). With the addition of NTf2- anions, the original two sets of signals of 1·OTf (Fig. 4c) gradually merged into a single group, and at the endpoint of titration, the 1H NMR spectrum of the system was closely matched with that of 1·NTf2 (Fig. S43 in Supporting information). Moreover, the 19F NMR spectra of TBANTf2@1·OTf (Fig. 4d and Fig. S44 in Supporting information) showed that the signals of the bound OTf- anions on the cage diminish gradually, and the introduced NTf2- anions take their place. These results suggest that NTf2- anions are able to fully replace the bound OTf- anions and also verify that NTf2- anion has a stronger binding ability with MOC 1.
Since the NTf2- anion is larger than the OTf- anion, which may impact its ability to bind to the cage [44], we opted to conduct titration experiments using the smaller BF4- anion to validate this hypothesis. First, the BF4- anions were titrated into the 1·NTf2 solution (marked as TBABF4@1·NTf2), and the 1H and 19F NMR spectra of this process were recorded. As shown in Fig. S43, after adding 16 equiv. of BF4- anions, the 1H NMR spectra of TBABF4@1·NTf2 remained almost unchanged. Additionally, the 19F NMR spectra of TBABF4@1·NTf2 (Fig. S45 in Supporting information) clearly revealed that the encapsulated NTf2- anions were not displaced by BF4- anions, and there was no obvious signal of encapsulated BF4- anions. This proves that the binding ability of the cage to NTf2- anion is indeed stronger than that of BF4- anion. Next, the same titration procedure and characterization was used for the TBABF4@1·OTf system (Figs. S47 and S48 in Supporting information). As BF4- anions were gradually added, the peak in the imine hydrogen region of TBABF4@1·OTf showed a slight change. This may be caused by the replacement of some OTf- anions, which was confirmed by the 19F NMR spectra of the system. The originally encapsulated OTf- anions in 1·OTf were partially replaced. When 16 equiv. of BF4- anion were added, this replacement still did not reach equilibrium. These results reveal that under the same concentration, the binding ability of OTf- anion to the cage is still stronger than that of BF4- anion. The above titration experiments generally reveal that NTf2- anion with larger size and charge distribution area may have stronger host-guest interactions with the cage.
The isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) technology is often used to study the association constants and thermodynamic parameters involved in forming host-guest complexes, which is important for understanding the binding process between host and guest [47–50]. Upon the addition of TBAOTf, TBANTf2, or TBABF4 (20 × 10-3 mol/L) to a CH3CN solution of 1·NTf2 or 1·OTf (1.0 × 10-3 mol/L), the association constants and thermodynamic parameters of these processes could be obtained and showed in Figs. S51 and S52 (Supporting information) and Table 1. Comparing and analyzing the experimental results, we observed that the association constant (K) value of the TBANTf2@1·OTf system was the highest at 1.314 × 103 L/mol, while the corresponding TBAOTf@1·NTf2 system did not exhibit significant heat exchange. This finding indicates that 1·OTf can convert to 1·NTf2 during the titration process with TBANTf2, whereas 1·NTf2 remains unchanged during the titration process with TBAOTf. This result is highly consistent with the NMR titration data. It is worth noting that in the TBANTf2@1·OTf system, the △H and T△S values are 0.290 and 0.486 kcal/mol, respectively, indicating that the complexation process is driven by entropy. Additionally, the K value of TBABF4@1·NTf2 system is 0.254 × 103 L/mol, which suggests that there could be some anion exchange processes occurring in the system. However, due to the entropy-driven nature of the above processes, they exhibit slight variations from the NMR results.
In our previous work [40], we have already demonstrated the selective encapsulation properties of the MOC 2 for pyrene. Hence, we are interested in investigating whether the binding ability of MOC 1 to pyrene is altered following vertex modification. To broaden the scope of our experiments, pyrene (Py) and its analogs 4,5,9,10-tetrahydropyrene (4H-Py) and hexadecahydropyrene (16H-Py) were selected as guests for binding test. In two standard experiments, 1·NTf2 and 1·OTf were dissolved in CH3CN (0.4 mL, 0.001 mmol), respectively, and an excess (5 equiv.) of pyrene was added to each solution. The reaction systems were equilibrated at 70 ℃ for 3 h. The reaction products were analyzed by NMR spectra (1H NMR, 19F NMR, COSY, NOESY, and DOSY, see Supporting information for details). As shown in Fig. 5a, most signals of 1·NTf2 remained unchanged, and a new set of characteristic peaks corresponding to Py@1·NTf2 emerged, which was also confirmed by ESI-TOF mass spectrum (Fig. S56 in Supporting information). It was worth noting that the 19F NMR spectra (Fig. 5b) of the NTf2- anions encapsulated in the cage did not change significantly before and after encapsulation of pyrene. The results indicate that the NTf2- anions have a stronger binding affinity with the cage than pyrene molecules. In comparison, the 1H NMR spectra of Py@1·OTf (Fig. 5c) exhibited noticeable shifts in either the high-field or low-field regions upon pyrene encapsulation compared to 1·OTf. It was observed that the two sets of signals for imine atoms of 1·OTf merged into single group. Upon the release of the encapsulated OTf- anions (Fig. 5d), the signals for F also merged into a single set (Fig. S66 in Supporting information), indicating complete replacement of the encapsulated OTf- anions. The ESI-TOF mass spectrum results also supported that the cage cavity was completely occupied by pyrene with the molar ratio of 1:1 for the host-guest complex (Fig. S70 in Supporting information). When pyrene is replaced by 4H-Py and 16H-Py, similar results can be obtained (see Supporting information for details). Overall, the host-guest chemistry experiments involving pyrene and its analogs further confirmed the stronger binding interaction between NTf2- anion and the cage compared to OTf- anion.
Since these polycyclic hydrocarbon guests can completely displace OTf- anions from the cage, it is beneficial to use ITC technology to study the thermodynamic parameters and association constants in these processes. 1·OTf and 2·OTf were selected as host molecules for subsequent testing. The ITC data were displayed in Figs. S92-S94 (Supporting information) and Table 2. All guest exchange processes are exothermic processes, indicating that they are driven by enthalpy. From the data listed in Table 2, Py and its analogs form complexes with 1·OTf, and their association constants follow the order: K(Py@1·OTf) > K(4H-Py@1·OTf) > K(16H-Py@1·OTf). The same trend is observed for the complexes with 2·OTf. Additionally, the time-dependent 1H NMR spectra of the binding process between 1·OTf or 2·OTf and Py or its analogs were recorded (Figs. S95-S100 in Supporting information). The results indicate that the system reaches equilibrium at 5 min after adding pyrene to the 1·OTf solution. In comparison, the corresponding equilibrium times for the 4H-Py and 16H-Py systems are 1 h and > 2 h, respectively. The host-guest system corresponding to 2·OTf shows a kinetic encapsulation process similar to that of 1·OTf. These can be attributed to the fact that Py has a larger π electron delocalization structure, which can form stronger C–H⋅⋅⋅π interactions with the cage skeleton [40]. However, due to partial hydrogenation, the aromaticity of 4H-Py is reduced, resulting in a decrease in the number of binding sites and strength. Fully hydrogenated 16H-Py lacks a conjugated system, has a more flexible structure and weaker binding ability. It is worth noting that there are significant differences in the binding constants for the formation of host-guest complexes with the same guest molecule, as seen in 1·OTf and 2·OTf. Taking Py as an example, its association constant with 1·OTf is 0.921 × 103 L/mol, and with 2·OTf it is 1.11 × 103 L/mol, the latter being greater than the former. The same situation occurs when 4H-Py and 16H-Py are guests. This may be due to the electron-withdrawing nature of the fluorine atoms introduced by the vertex modification, which changes the overall charge distribution of MOC 1 skeleton, weakening its interaction with Py and its analogs. To verify this speculation, electrostatic potential (ESP) analysis based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations was performed to probe the effect of F substitution on the charge distribution of the skeletons of MOC 1 and 2. As illustrated in Fig. 6, the positively charged areas at the face and window positions of MOC 1 are more extensive and intense than those of MOC 2, indicating that the F substitution induced a decrease in the electron density of the cage skeleton. The above changes lead to a weakening of the C–H⋅⋅⋅π interaction between the guest and the MOC 1 skeleton [40], which is manifested as a binding constant smaller than that of the corresponding MOC 2.
In summary, we demonstrate a feasible vertex modification approach for tuning the host-guest chemistry of metal-organic cages. The vertex modification of MOC 1 with fluorine atoms significantly alters its host-guest chemistry compared to the non-fluorinated analog MOC 2. Structural and spectroscopic analyses confirmed that MOC 1 retains a hexahedral skeleton but exhibits enhanced anion selectivity, favoring larger NTf2- over OTf- or BF4-. Furthermore, pyrene displaced OTf- but not NTf2-, reflecting the hierarchical binding strengths of anions. The reduced association constants of 1·OTf with pyrene and its analogs, compared to 2·OTf, highlight the electronic effects of fluorine substitution on host-guest affinity. This work demonstrates that strategic vertex modification in MOCs enables fine-tuning of anion selectivity and guest-binding properties. This approach offers valuable insights for creating new functional materials based on metal-organic cages for applications such as molecular recognition, sensing, and catalysis in the future.
1
M. Fujita, M. Tominaga, A. Hori, B. Therrien, Acc. Chem. Res. 38 (2005) 371–380.
2
M.D. Pluth, K.N. Raymond, Chem. Soc. Rev. 36 (2007) 161–171.
3
T.R. Cook, P.J. Stang, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 7001–7045.
4
F.J. Rizzuto, L.K.S. von Krbek, J.R. Nitschke, Nat. Rev. Chem. 3 (2019) 204–222.
5
M. Han, D.M. Engelhard, G.H. Clever, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 1848–1860.
6
Y.L. Lu, Y.P. Wang, K. Wu, M. Pan, C.Y. Su, Acc. Chem. Res. 57 (2024) 3277–3291.
7
Y. Jin, Q. Zhang, Y. Zhang, C. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 49 (2020) 5561–5600 49.
8
X.Z. Li, C.B. Tian, Q.F. Sun, Chem. Rev. 122 (2022) 6374–6458.
9
H. Amouri, C. Desmarets, J. Moussa, Chem. Rev. 112 (2012) 2015–2041.
10
A. Ghosh, J. Pruchyathamkorn, C.F. Espinosa, J.R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 2568–2573.
11
E. Benchimol, H.M. O'Connor, B. Schmidt, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64 (2025) e202421137.
12
C.W. Zhou, X.Z. Wang, M. Xie, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202315020.
13
P. Mal, B. Breiner, K. Rissanen, J.R. Nitschke, Science 324 (2009) 1697–1699.
14
M. Yamashina, Y. Sei, M. Akita, M. Yoshizawa, Nat. Commun. 5 (2014) 4662.
15
H. Takezawa, K. Shitozawa, M. Fujita, Nat. Chem. 12 (2020) 574–578.
16
C.J. Brown, F.D. Toste, R.G. Bergman, K.N. Raymond, Chem. Rev. 115 (2015) 3012–3035.
17
S.H.A.M. Leenders, R. Gramage-Doria, B. de Bruin, J.N.H. Reek, Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (2015) 433–448.
18
J. Jiao, Z. Li, Z. Qiao, et al., Nat. Commun. 9 (2018) 4423.
19
Y. -P. Wang, Y. Zhang, X.H. Duan, et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 501 (2024) 215570.
20
E.G. Percastegui, T.K. Ronson, J.R. Nitschke, Chem. Rev. 120 (2020) 13480–13544.
21
M.M.J. Smulders, I.A. Riddell, C. Browne, J.R. Nitschke, Chem. Soc. Rev. 42 (2013) 1728–1754.
22
R. Custelcean, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014) 1813–1824.
23
X.W. Zhu, D. Luo, X.P. Zhou, D. Li, Coord. Chem. Rev. 455 (2022) 214354.
24
D.A. Roberts, B.S. Pilgrim, J.R. Nitschke, Chem. Soc. Rev. 47 (2018) 626–644.
25
S. Pullen, G.H. Clever, Acc. Chem. Res. 51 (2018) 3052–3064.
26
E. Sanchez-Gonzalez, M.Y. Tsang, J. Troyano, G.A. Craig, S. Furukawa, Chem. Soc. Rev. 51 (2022) 4876–4889.
27
J. Liu, Z. Wang, P. Cheng, et al., Nat. Rev. Chem. 6 (2022) 339–356.
28
D. Luo, X.W. Zhu, X.P. Zhou, D. Li, Chem. Eur. J. 30 (2024) e202400020.
29
D. Fujita, Y. Ueda, S. Sato, et al., Chem 1 (2016) 91–101.
30
B. Chen, J.J. Holstein, A. Platzek, et al., Chem. Sci. 13 (2022) 1829–1834.
31
Y. Liu, S.H. Liao, W.T. Dai, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202217215.
32
D. Luo, X.Z. Wang, C. Yang, X.P. Zhou, D. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (2018) 118–121.
33
W. Xue, K. Wu, N. Ouyang, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202301319.
34
H. Zhu, T.K. Ronson, K. Wu, J.R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146 (2024) 2370–2378.
35
A.J. McConnell, C.M. Aitchison, A.B. Grommet, J.R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 6294–6297.
36
Y. Yang, T.K. Ronson, J. Zheng, N. Mihara, J.R. Nitschke, Chem 9 (2023) 1972–1982.
37
M.D. Ludden, C.G.P. Taylor, M.D. Ward, Chem. Sci. 12 (2021) 12640–12650.
38
X. Zhang, X. Dong, W. Lu, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141 (2019) 11621–11627.
39
M.Y. Sun, M. Xie, C.W. Zhou, Sci. China Chem. 66 (2023) 2004–2010.
40
Y.L. Lai, J. Su, L.X. Wu, et al., Chin. Chem. Lett. 35 (2024) 108326.
41
J.A. Davies, A. Tarzia, T.K. Ronson, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202217987.
42
D. Luo, L.X. Wu, Y. Zhang, et al., Sci. China Chem. 65 (2022) 1105–1111.
43
D. Luo, Z.J. Yuan, L.J. Ping, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62 (2023) e202216977.
44
D. Zhang, T.K. Ronson, J. Mosquera, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (2017) 6574–6577.
45
S. Ma, M.M.J. Smulders, Y.R. Hristova, et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 5678–5684.
46
M.M.J. Smulders, S. Zarra, J.R. Nitschke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135 (2013) 7039–7046.
47
Y.L. Lai, M. Xie, X.C. Zhou, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63 (2024) e202402829.
48
G. Li, T.K. Ronson, R. Lavendomme, et al., Chem 9 (2023) 1549–1561.
49
R.J. Li, M. Han, J. Tessarolo, et al., ChemPhotoChem 3 (2019) 378–383.
50
T. Feng, X. Li, J. Wu, C. He, C. Duan, Chin. Chem. Lett. 31 (2020) 95–98.
Year 2026 volume 37 Issue 9
PDF
74
42
Cite this Article
BibTeX
Article Info
doi: 10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111331
  • Receive Date:2025-03-11
  • Online Date:2026-10-27
  • Published:2026-09-15
Article Data
Affiliations
History
  • Received:2025-03-11
  • Revised:2025-05-12
  • Accepted:2025-05-15
Affiliations
    aCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Coordination Chemistry, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
    bDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China

Corresponding:

*

E-mail addresses: (D. Luo)
(X.-P. Zhou)
References
Share
https://castjournals.cast.org.cn/joweb/ccl/EN/10.1016/j.cclet.2025.111331
Share to
QR

Scan QR to access full text

Cite this article
BibTeX
Citations
表12种不同金属材料的力学参数
科
Family
属数
Number of
genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of
total species (%)
属
Genus
种数
Number of
species
占总种数比例
Percentage of total
species (%)
鹅膏菌科Amanitaceae 2 11 5.26 鹅膏菌属 Amanita 10 4.78
小菇科 Mycenaceae 2 12 5.74 丝盖伞属 Inocybe 5 2.39
多孔菌科 Polyporaceae 8 14 6.70 蜡蘑属 Laccaria 5 2.39
红菇科 Russulaceae 3 23 11.00 小皮伞属 Marasmius 6 2.87
小菇属 Mycena 11 5.26
光柄菇属 Pluteus 5 2.39
红菇属 Russula 17 8.13
栓菌属 Trametes 5 2.39
关闭全屏
  • BibTeX
  • EndNote
  • RefWorks
  • TxT